Robots
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 23 Jan 2015
When I was younger I thought robots would do the hard work for people. A mistake. It developed completely differently
First and foremost, robots or AI are taking jobs away from educated people and artists. On the contrary, craftsmen are almost irreplaceable.
There's actually no art left that isn't made better by AI, except perhaps expressive dance and wrestling.
First and foremost, robots or AI are taking jobs away from educated people and artists. On the contrary, craftsmen are almost irreplaceable.
There's actually no art left that isn't made better by AI, except perhaps expressive dance and wrestling.
Music:
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 11389
- Joined: 28 Dec 2015
Nearly every new technolgy cost jobs in the past... Then there is room for different jobs...
AI is its own art. Same as music with a synth is - some would say, only music with real instruments is music - whatever that means...
AI is the first new technology, that could destroy human kind. No, wait...fire could do that too
AI is its own art. Same as music with a synth is - some would say, only music with real instruments is music - whatever that means...
AI is the first new technology, that could destroy human kind. No, wait...fire could do that too
Reason13, Win10
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 23 Jan 2015
I think a career as a wrestler is the safest option and what you should advise children these days. ; )
Music:
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
-
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: 06 Nov 2021
- Location: ##########
Check out Moravec's paradox: The hard things are easy, the easy things are hard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec%27s_paradox
-------
Reached the breaking-point. CrimsonWarlock has left the forum.
Reached the breaking-point. CrimsonWarlock has left the forum.
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 23 Jan 2015
By the way: The path from a wrestler to a record deal also seems easier to me than the one through music agencies
Music:
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
-
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017
- Location: Norway
Are you somehow a timer traveler or something?
Better? Replacing artists and writers? LoL. No.
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 23 Jan 2015
crimsonwarlock wrote: โ29 Jan 2024Check out Moravec's paradox: The hard things are easy, the easy things are hard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec%27s_paradox
Reminds me of Musashi "The Book of the Five Rings" there was something similar, although I can't find it in the Musashi quotes. Something like โBe meticulous about the little things and decide big things in a moment.โ
Music:
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 23 Jan 2015
This is what I (and not the only one) find visible and logical. Especially with music. Where is there still room for a human idea that hasn't already been repeated hundreds of thousands of times? Slight sound and text changes, other voices, other faces, the AI can do that better and also has a better overview.PhillipOrdonez wrote: โ29 Jan 2024
Are you somehow a timer traveler or something?
Better? Replacing artists and writers? LoL. No.
If we can analyze the individual elements of a piece and reproduce them in slightly different ways, AI can most likely do it faster and better. And all of the top ten are just slight changes to the same thing.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/elijahclar ... l-artists/
Music:
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 23 Jan 2015
And on Top you can't put AI on Court for Copyright infringement.
Music:
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
-
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017
- Location: Norway
In what world do you think you can replicate a piece with slight modifications, call it your own and profit from it?
Bots canโt. And why would any artist want to do this?
There are people who run scams, yes. But are you an artist or a scammer? Cause only the latter would consider it a viable path to follow. Bots suck ass at creating art, dawg, thereโs just no other way to say it. Insipid, empty, disposable noise.
Bots canโt. And why would any artist want to do this?
There are people who run scams, yes. But are you an artist or a scammer? Cause only the latter would consider it a viable path to follow. Bots suck ass at creating art, dawg, thereโs just no other way to say it. Insipid, empty, disposable noise.
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: 23 Jan 2015
I am just as much a victim of this development as anyone else. Artists don't steal? Artists with a lot of money can now even steal in such a way that no one notices. Or to put it another way, a fool with enough money can decide to write a hit song tomorrow. Nobody can complain and they even buy their way into the charts to the point where it gets played on the radio. Just remember Milly Vanilly, but there was still a musician behind it, you don't need that anymore.
I'm not even thinking about private individuals, every record label can save a lot of costs this way. And they can do that perfectly with the rights.
I'm not even thinking about private individuals, every record label can save a lot of costs this way. And they can do that perfectly with the rights.
Music:
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
My Songs on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@FGLucas-wj1eg.
My Songs on Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/frank-georg-lucas.
-
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017
- Location: Norway
Good luck to you and them. Useless music that will only be played by bots. This โaiโ dumbassery is like nfts. People are going to exploit it, suckers are going to fall for it, and eventually it will fizzle out like everything else the tech bros come up with. Scam after scam after scamโฆ
Have you even heard what the bots โcreate โ? lol off you think that it will be well received by any significant number of people besides suckers
Have you even heard what the bots โcreate โ? lol off you think that it will be well received by any significant number of people besides suckers
-
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: 29 Aug 2015
- Location: Sweden
-
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017
- Location: Norway
Also, you seem to think the way the industry has always worked regarding charts and money is the anomaly instead of the rule? There's almost no way an artist that gets charted and in on the radio and everywhere did not spend a ton of money to get there. Did you think that anyone ever made bank off music without paying a looooot of money? But that's how it has always been!
-
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 506
- Joined: 11 Feb 2021
- Location: Europe
A book on how to build a bridge costs less than the bridge. The information in the book on how to build a bridge can be changed, updated, rethought, rewritten dozens of times at a tiny fraction of the cost of the bridge, and the bridge accepts minimal improvements without having to be torn down and rebuilt at enormous cost.
But when bridge 'theory' has reached such a level of precision and reliability that there is no longer any doubt as to how to build the best possible bridge for every occasion, then construction can be automated.
A bridge gives work to one archer and fifty workers.
When the machines build the bridge 50 families go without dinner.
I want to say that it is now the intellectual and 'creative' trades that are under siege by AI, but it is because these trades are immaterial and therefore inexpensive and we always start, for lack of funds and confidence, with the cheap stuff.
But now AI is a certainty: it is there, it is electrifying, and it will never go away.
The marriage of AI and robotics is already underway and it won't be long before autonomous buses, robot plumbers, AI carpenters, etc. will be a reality.
And as soon as the prototypes hit the market, they will lower the 'production' costs of even the craft trades, so ALL jobs will be compromised and we will be forced to rethink the working (and economic) world from the ground up.
Many tears will be shed but a powerful tool is better than a less powerful tool, and I am confident for our medium- to long-term future with AI.
-
- RE Developer
- Posts: 12148
- Joined: 15 Jan 2015
- Location: The NorthWoods, CT, USA
I remember being fascinated by this concept years ago, that the things we thought would be difficult (robots/computers playing chess) ended up being fairly easy, while the basic concepts like lifting a glass to our lips is still difficult for robots.crimsonwarlock wrote: โ29 Jan 2024Check out Moravec's paradox: The hard things are easy, the easy things are hard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec%27s_paradox
Selig Audio, LLC
-
- RE Developer
- Posts: 12148
- Joined: 15 Jan 2015
- Location: The NorthWoods, CT, USA
I feel like AI has quite a few more applications than NFTs - or maybe comparing AI to block chain would be a better comparison, since AI is tech and NFTs are specific applications of tech (block chain).PhillipOrdonez wrote: โ29 Jan 2024Good luck to you and them. Useless music that will only be played by bots. This โaiโ dumbassery is like nfts. People are going to exploit it, suckers are going to fall for it, and eventually it will fizzle out like everything else the tech bros come up with. Scam after scam after scamโฆ
Have you even heard what the bots โcreate โ? lol off you think that it will be well received by any significant number of people besides suckers
As for AI and to those asking what is the use, I would just quote Franklin and say โ what is the use of a new born baby?โ.
Selig Audio, LLC
-
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
757365206C6F67696320746F207365656B20616E73776572732075736520726561736F6E20746F2066696E6420776973646F6D20676574206F7574206F6620796F757220636F6D666F7274207A6F6E65206F7220796F757220696E737069726174696F6E2077696C6C206372797374616C6C697A6520666F7265766572
-
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: 22 Feb 2017
ReasonTalk forum AI when?
- Certified Reason expert
-
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 3226
- Joined: 23 Feb 2017
- Location: Oregon
As far as i've heard, AI can only regurgitate music it has trained on
-
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 506
- Joined: 11 Feb 2021
- Location: Europe
Just as we do and have always done as humans. We have imitated the sounds of nature, built instruments to approximate those sounds (failing miserably) but with these imperfect instruments we have created novel sounds that we have fallen in love with. Schools and traditions were formed, each with its own instruments and its own canons, in which essentially the same corpus was repeated and replayed with minimal variations. Then separate traditions came together, some disappeared forever, others became so majority that they appeared to be the only "right" ones, but it was always a remixing of existing stuff, making admixtures, contaminations, mash-ups. Everything AI already does with the stuff we've produced. Obviously, by design, AI tries to be in the Gaussian ridge, so it comes up with stuff that quantitatively looks more "appreciable," but it is perfectly at the occorence of even the most extreme and niche bangs of human music production, if those are online.
The only difference is that AI does not catch happy accidents without a human pointing them out. To it, one track is as good as the next. Without human taste, AI is nothing but the summation of everything, with no hierarchy, no history with no criteria other than the "sense" that the concentration of data gives.
AI has no taste -- for now.
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests