https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatwick_A ... e_incident
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... wick-drone
https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/12/1 ... -incident/
"The kind of manoeuvres the ‘drones’ were supposedly performing ought to have aroused at least some scepticism from officials. For instance, not even a military-grade drone could have stayed in the air for more than 24 hours, yet the Gatwick ‘drone’ somehow managed to wreak havoc for three days straight. Witnesses also described a drone weaving in between the airport’s buildings, performing complex movements that were not only technologically implausible, but would also have required intimate knowledge of the airport’s layout."
Sounds familiar:The British authorities still insist that Gatwick was subjected to a malicious, sophisticated drone incursion. Sussex Police say they received 170 reports of drone sightings during the three days when the airport was closed, 115 of which they deemed to be ‘credible’ – not least as many came from airport staff and police officers themselves.
Also Yichang Sanxia International Airport supposedly cancelled flights due to drones Sep 24:An investigation involving five English police forces was launched. But it had to be called off after 18 months, as it could find no video or photographic evidence to corroborate the drone sightings.
https://ground.news/article/a-suspected ... ted_e38f2f