I certainly hope time does NOT prove me wrong!

Not to play devil's advocate, but if the conversion pictured below is accurate, then I'm having a hard time understanding how a $720,750 USD net profit for a company of 40+ employees is doing just fine?eXode wrote:But as you can see for yourselves, propellerhead had a NET PROFIT of 10.5 million SEK in 2013 and 6.1 million SEK in 2014.
NEWSFLASH! They are doing just fine!
Actually, that poll seems to indicate that over 40% of the users who answered on are an earlier version of Reason (7.1.2 or earlier). Granted, only 66 people have answered as of this morning, so the sample size is certainly not representative of their entire customer base.TheMiles wrote:Have you seen the poll on wich version of reason is used the most ? 8.3 seems to be adopted widely...
Do you understand the meaning of net profit here? If you do, how much net profit do they need to be doing OK in your opinion?EnochLight wrote:Not to play devil's advocate, but if the conversion pictured below is accurate, then I'm having a hard time understanding how a $720,750 USD net profit for a company of 40+ employees is doing just fine?eXode wrote:But as you can see for yourselves, propellerhead had a NET PROFIT of 10.5 million SEK in 2013 and 6.1 million SEK in 2014.
NEWSFLASH! They are doing just fine!
eXode wrote:Do you understand the meaning of net profit here? If you do, how much net profit do they need to be doing OK in your opinion?EnochLight wrote:Not to play devil's advocate, but if the conversion pictured below is accurate, then I'm having a hard time understanding how a $720,750 USD net profit for a company of 40+ employees is doing just fine?eXode wrote:But as you can see for yourselves, propellerhead had a NET PROFIT of 10.5 million SEK in 2013 and 6.1 million SEK in 2014.
NEWSFLASH! They are doing just fine!
Hi guys,joeyluck wrote:Enochlight, net profit is after they have paid themselves and all expenses.
You're right that it is still a small sample size...EnochLight wrote:Actually, that poll seems to indicate that over 40% of the users who answered on are an earlier version of Reason (7.1.2 or earlier). Granted, only 66 people have answered as of this morning, so the sample size is certainly not representative of their entire customer base.TheMiles wrote:Have you seen the poll on wich version of reason is used the most ? 8.3 seems to be adopted widely...
That's a good idea. Will wait for the other poll to run its course though.joeyluck wrote: For the next poll, instead of all the point version options, I would create a poll that would have options for things like
'Reason 8 full - new customer' 'Reason 8 upgrade' so that could help answer some of that
Dylan, you have to be much more careful with financials. It looks like Ableton has a revenue of 13 million having 125 employees, while Props have a revenue of 10 million with 40 employees. It's therefore easy to say Props is way more healthy than Ableton, but there are so many factors that need to be added in. Revenue and profit numbers by themselves are misleading. Having high profit margins can be done for stockholders while investing in future projects is neglected. High profit margins with underpaid employees often leads to instability. Etc.EnochLight wrote:...That's a net profit of a little over 7.6% of their gross revenue.
When you have companies like Ableton doing (say for instance, in 2013) a gross revenue/net sales of $12,991,628 USD with a net profit of $2,259,486 USD... that's about 17.4% of their gross revenue. This is for a company that does not have their own proprietary plugin format/store as the only form of 3rd party plugins available to their flagship product and with an average employee count of quite a bit more. And yes, I realize Ableton is a much larger company with more products, but it's not the amount of revenue/net revenue; it's the percentage of profit.
So I ask again: is a 7.6% profit margin healthy for a company of this size?
Speculation is usually a waste of time when it's done by actuarian and experts, it's even funnier when it's carried out by lay people.EnochLight wrote:Not to play devil's advocate, but if the conversion pictured below is accurate, then I'm having a hard time understanding how a $720,750 USD net profit for a company of 40+ employees is doing just fine?eXode wrote:But as you can see for yourselves, propellerhead had a NET PROFIT of 10.5 million SEK in 2013 and 6.1 million SEK in 2014.
NEWSFLASH! They are doing just fine!
Agreed. It seems like the only (recent) year where any sort of red was ever shown was during the RE SDK development/roll out as well as Balance. While I was disappointed that they abandoned their hardware experiment, I'm glad they did so if it means keeping them viable.Ostermilk wrote:What was fantastic was the small amount of time they we're in the red after making the move to Rack Extensions and software as a service generally which must have represented a significant amount of financial planning
Thanks John. Yes, it's a good point that companies such as Ableton have almost 3x the employees as Propellerhead. Hence, a 7.6% net profit margin with 40 employees versus a 17.4% net profit margin with 125 employees is something to take into consideration. If you were to break this down per-capita using net profit (cash) / number of employees, then the cash amount is almost the same between these two examples.jfrichards wrote:Dylan, you have to be much more careful with financials. It looks like Ableton has a revenue of 13 million having 125 employees, while Props have a revenue of 10 million with 40 employees. It's therefore easy to say Props is way more healthy than Ableton, but there are so many factors that need to be added in. Revenue and profit numbers by themselves are misleading. Having high profit margins can be done for stockholders while investing in future projects is neglected. High profit margins with underpaid employees often leads to instability. Etc.EnochLight wrote:...
So I ask again: is a 7.6% profit margin healthy for a company of this size?
Hah! Ain't that the truth. I know I contributed to their bottom line, that's for sure. Anyway, if 2014 is anything to go by, I'm willing to wager that 2015 will look even better.satyr32 wrote:I am really looking forward to the 2015 data. It might be that this will be their best year taking in consideration the number of REs I purchased
Another member to the Discover team too I guess
Yonatan wrote:Well, dead or not. They have a killer competition. Look at Logic X 10.2.
You get a mega powerful synth called Alchemy, an integration with Gobbler (cloud-service where you can save, upload and share to collaborate with other producers etc), and on top of the cake; the ability to distribute ones songs directly from Logic to Apple Music!
And all that is for free to all Logic X 10.-users. And it has video-support, and score-window, and stock devices that ppl pay €99 each for in the PH Shop,
often because the lack of it in Reason devices. I love Reason to evolve, but man how I am getting tired since R8 was released and Discover came along. Maybe I´ll end up using R8 only as a sketch-pad and beat-maker for certain things, and Logic as a main DAW. I sweared not to go that route, but now I seriously consider that option. I will wait until 8.4 or 8.5 before I finally decide.
Well. Using Reason has become quite expensive yet you get less for the money.
Something has to change at PH or they will not last long.
Apple are giving artists what they need and want, real value.
I would like to see tha same spirit from Propellerheads.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests