Greetings
This melody and chorus have haunted me for several days. I just had to get it out of my head asap. However, now that it is done, it seems like my brain has strayed from the folk-approach and want me to make a Eurovision Contest Song. I usually do not use that much sugar in my coffee, even when writing in major. Judge for yourself, it okay to let me know if it gets nauseating.
All is Reason 12 + Third Parties.
Kindly Gothi
Tribe of Hofund
Return of the Ships (pagan) - Too Eurovision Contest-y?
Forum rules
Remember to begin your thread subject with a genre, ie.: (Hiphop) New instrumental
Remember to begin your thread subject with a genre, ie.: (Hiphop) New instrumental
- Benedict
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 2786
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Contact:
I never really get why people get so bent at Pop. Pop is hard to do. Anyone can make a nasty noise with no interest for 99% of people. It takes a lot more to deliver a hummable melody, let alone one that has people wanting to come back.
Without knowing your usual output I couldn't say directly what you "should" do with this but I like it. A new mix that makes it more melodic and charming (less thuddy) would please me. Bands that really last usually have at least one crossover or "I Was Made For Loving You" in their repertoire so why not you too?
Without knowing your usual output I couldn't say directly what you "should" do with this but I like it. A new mix that makes it more melodic and charming (less thuddy) would please me. Bands that really last usually have at least one crossover or "I Was Made For Loving You" in their repertoire so why not you too?
Thanks, mate. Yeah pop is generally underestimated in time of noise + 4 to the floors. Well, I am raised with Abba, Boney M, massive amounts of synth pop, progressive rock and new romantic, and even my days as metal fan offered more melodic approaches like AC/DC, Sabbath, Judas Priest, Thin Lizzy and Whitesnake back then. It is a part of me, and if it wants to get out if gotta get out. I have decided to use it as last track on our upcoming third album.Benedict wrote: ↑16 Nov 2024I never really get why people get so bent at Pop. Pop is hard to do. Anyone can make a nasty noise with no interest for 99% of people. It takes a lot more to deliver a hummable melody, let alone one that has people wanting to come back.
Without knowing your usual output I couldn't say directly what you "should" do with this but I like it.
- Benedict
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 2786
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Contact:
Same here and good ladGothi wrote: ↑17 Nov 2024Thanks, mate. Yeah pop is generally underestimated in time of noise + 4 to the floors. Well, I am raised with Abba, Boney M, massive amounts of synth pop, progressive rock and new romantic, and even my days as metal fan offered more melodic approaches like AC/DC, Sabbath, Judas Priest, Thin Lizzy and Whitesnake back then. It is a part of me, and if it wants to get out if gotta get out. I have decided to use it as last track on our upcoming third album.Benedict wrote: ↑16 Nov 2024I never really get why people get so bent at Pop. Pop is hard to do. Anyone can make a nasty noise with no interest for 99% of people. It takes a lot more to deliver a hummable melody, let alone one that has people wanting to come back.
Without knowing your usual output I couldn't say directly what you "should" do with this but I like it.
Any time you use one of the popular "four chord progressions" you can potentially run into this issue (sounding "poppy"). You've used what I've called the "Heart and Soul" (or "Unchained Melody") progression.
When using these classic progressions the melody becomes the driving force - use a simple/expected melody on top of a simple/expected chord progression and you sound "pop", but if you can work out a more unexpected melody you'll sound less "EuroPoppy" (if that's a term!), even with such a classic chord progression.
As for your original question, the answer comes entirely from you. To ME it sounds predictable, which is only a bad thing if YOUR goal was not to sound predictable - and only then if you actually agree with me that it sounds predictable.
All of the above is said with no judgment whatsoever, I was raised on equal amounts of bubble gum pop and avant-garde music (and everything in between) so I'm a bit of a freak in that regard….
When using these classic progressions the melody becomes the driving force - use a simple/expected melody on top of a simple/expected chord progression and you sound "pop", but if you can work out a more unexpected melody you'll sound less "EuroPoppy" (if that's a term!), even with such a classic chord progression.
As for your original question, the answer comes entirely from you. To ME it sounds predictable, which is only a bad thing if YOUR goal was not to sound predictable - and only then if you actually agree with me that it sounds predictable.
All of the above is said with no judgment whatsoever, I was raised on equal amounts of bubble gum pop and avant-garde music (and everything in between) so I'm a bit of a freak in that regard….
Selig Audio, LLC
Ha, ha. Well usually I do avoid these modern standard progressions, but my brain did not care much for that this time. It finished it before I began making it. Even the half-canon in the second verse. Rare to me. Usually things arise while playing and producing, not by demand: “Do this or I will drive you nuts with the melody.” Predictable is okay, “nauseating sweet” not so much.selig wrote: ↑18 Nov 2024Any time you use one of the popular "four chord progressions" you can potentially run into this issue (sounding "poppy"). You've used what I've called the "Heart and Soul" (or "Unchained Melody") progression.
As for your original question, the answer comes entirely from you. To ME it sounds predictable, which is only a bad thing if YOUR goal was not to sound predictable .
- TritoneAddiction
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 4330
- Joined: 29 Aug 2015
- Location: Sweden
My approach is always to just go with it. Whatever comes out naturally, let it flow. It's much more fun that way rather than putting oneself in a box creatively. Maybe it's not a coincidence that I've done everything from cartoon music to death metal.
Yeah. If your soul have some musical to state, one should listen, not reject it, even if it surprises you. At least I did not lift the last chorus the famous halftone. That is something ;-D
You COULD have gone full Barry Manilow with a modulation on the last chorus indeed, and I applaud your restraint!
Sometimes one really has little control over what comes out, we just do our best to get out of the way!
I feel it's good to complete these projects that seem to come from left field, and to only judge them (if at all) after the fact.
As corny as it sounds, sometimes it's not where you end up but what you learn along the way.
So maybe you'd never release it on an album, but sounds like you had fun making it!
Sometimes we lead the music, other times the music leads us.
Selig Audio, LLC
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest