Which legacy utility or effect devices would you like to see upgraded to 2.0 versions in the future

This forum is for discussing Reason. Questions, answers, ideas, and opinions... all apply.
Post Reply

Which one of this is a priority for you?

Matrix
22
18%
Line Mixer 6:2
6
5%
Mixer 14:2
9
7%
Spider CV Merger & Splitter
6
5%
Spider Audio Merger & Splitter
4
3%
Pulsar Dual LFO
10
8%
ECF-42 Envelope
1
1%
D-11 Foldback Distortion
1
1%
PEQ-2
1
1%
COMP-01
5
4%
DDL-1 Digital Delay Line
2
2%
CF-101 Chorus/Flanger
1
1%
PH-90 Phaser
1
1%
RV-7 Digital Reverb
5
4%
UN-16 Unison
6
5%
RPG-8 Monophonic Arpeggiator
6
5%
ID8
4
3%
Audiomatic Retro Transformer
16
13%
Dr. Octo Rex Loop Player
12
10%
Other - specify in the comment section
5
4%
 
Total votes: 123
User avatar
Re8et
Competition Winner
Posts: 1551
Joined: 14 Nov 2016

17 Sep 2024

After the Combinator 2.0, I am expecting some other stuff 2.0. I'd love some updates on some of the old core
stuff that made Reason, maybe not replacing it entirely as was the case with the Combinator, which didn't break
retrocompability btw... 5 votes each for the pool.

Matrix editor ( a new one, maybe with song mode, multichannel, etc)
Line Mixer 6:2 (built in FX?)
Mixer 14:2 (better EQ?)
All small, half rack modules, DL, Unison, Reverb, Filter, Dist... 2.0 with the same form factor...

Is it an impossible request or is it feasible that we could get these upgrades in the next Reason 13 update,
or we will have to wait for Reason 14?

We had some notable upgrades over the years included in the stock modules also I'm very happy for...
All new players are a sort of Matrix 2.0, but in reality they are not, at least not how I imagine it should be.
Also... Dr. Rex... Has the format been abandoned???


Som of the Stuff that got updated

Combinator 2.0 < Combinator
BV-X Multimode Vocoder (Is it stock now?) < BV512 Vocoder
Stereo Tool < MClass Stereo Imager
Pattern Mutator < Matrix
PolyStep Sequencer < Matrix
Ripley Space Delay < Space Echo < DL-16
Pulveriser Demolition Unit < Scream 4 Sound Destruction Unit
Grain Sample Manipulator < NN-XT Advanced Sampler
Quartet Chorus Ensemble < CF-101 Chorus/Flanger
Sweeper Modulation Effect < ECF-42 Envelope
Last edited by Re8et on 17 Sep 2024, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
challism
Moderator
Posts: 4729
Joined: 17 Jan 2015
Location: Fanboy Shill, Boomertown

17 Sep 2024

I think the title of this post is confusing. Shouldn't it ask a question like: Which legacy utility or effect devices would you like to see upgraded to 2.0 versions in the future?" instead of what it says now?
Players are to MIDI what synthesizers are to waveforms.

ReasonTalk Rules and Guidelines

User avatar
Re8et
Competition Winner
Posts: 1551
Joined: 14 Nov 2016

17 Sep 2024

challism wrote:
17 Sep 2024
I think the title of this post is confusing. Shouldn't it ask a question like: Which legacy utility or effect devices would you like to see upgraded to 2.0 versions in the future?" instead of what it says now?
fixed to your suggestion

User avatar
mcatalao
Competition Winner
Posts: 1908
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

17 Sep 2024

First and foremost, the last 3 batch of effects and instruments RS included in Reason 11, 12 and 13 answeer a lot of the older effects.

So stuff like DDL 1, Phaser, chorus, etc will not have a 2.0 version, imho. From that list at most, i think we will have some sort of Matrix 2.0 in the form of a player, not a CV device.

RPG8, already has a more advanced arpeggiator as a player, and it can work single or dual mode. So I don't see either the need or any way to that happen.

ID8 is a path deviation from the Record times. I think all its sounds exist in NN-XT, or sampled refills and NN-XT is by all meanings 1000x more advanced and more versatile than ID8. So instead of ID8, i think reason studio should think about upgrading NN-XT or have a newer multi sampled sampler. Mimic, despite being quite a workhorse, lacks a lot functionality for nn-xt! If possible with hd streamming.

And if you think about PEQ 2 and Comp 01, the mixer comp and eq ported to single devices are already upgrades to those. So i guess at least half of what you proposed on your list, already has an update in the form of a new, big, stronger, and better sounding device, imho.

Where i think reason studios should invest is the sequencer, and there was a small one in this version, thoug i think it its a pale effort for the things i think are missing in the sequencer.

A good start would be:

- Track Folders
- Auto Punch in/Out
- Retrospective Recording (midi at least)
- Track Freezing

Cheers!

User avatar
Re8et
Competition Winner
Posts: 1551
Joined: 14 Nov 2016

17 Sep 2024

mcatalao wrote:
17 Sep 2024

And if you think about PEQ 2 and Comp 01, the mixer comp and eq ported to single devices are already upgrades to those. So i guess at least half of what you proposed on your list, already has an update in the form of a new, big, stronger, and better sounding device, imho.
I don't consider any of the new bigger version devices as un update to the old mini utilities.
Much of their appeal is that they are 'mini' half rack, and the only with such a small footprint.
Anyway I pointed some of them, like the Chorus and the sweeper, as being upgrades.
Imho.

ID8 could be upgraded with full Midi packages, libraries like some old Roland, Korg, and other old Midi devices.
What you say it's true. When loading a Midi song, there are always better sounds to choose from
than the standard ID8 sounds. But the ID8 is the default Midi device that get loaded when
opening a Midi song. So it still makes sense to have a newer Midi specific player with extended libraries.
I'm also not sure if the ID8 reads Midi CC differently from what a NN-XT would?
Not sure about it.

avasopht
Competition Winner
Posts: 4073
Joined: 16 Jan 2015

17 Sep 2024

For me it's more a question of how legacy devices are upgraded.

A few general enhancements:
1. Analog knob where appropriate.
2. DAC (Triton Extreme VST has this and allows you to have to output pass through an analogue modelled tube amp).
3. Unison with detune and for some devices, more advanced drift settings.
4. Oversampling for synths (where applicable, as some wavetables modules in Thor don't seem to need it).
5. Audio-CV ports.
6. Device gain knob with a simple compression, limiting or soft-clipping control (with some mini display to guide user control).

Specific devices:
1. ID8: Extend until it's more in line with Xpand!2
2. Thor: fix that bug to open its full capabilities as an insert effect.

Some devices have sections that would work great as individual utilities. But since you want to avoid device pollution, maybe a device with a stack of changeable sections taken from legacy devices with some matrix routing or something to turn it into a super FX monolith.

User avatar
dioxide
Posts: 1827
Joined: 15 Jul 2015

18 Sep 2024

Subtractor is missing from the list. I'd probably add the effects from Europa and other more recent RS synths.

User avatar
mcatalao
Competition Winner
Posts: 1908
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

18 Sep 2024

Re8et wrote:
17 Sep 2024
mcatalao wrote:
17 Sep 2024

And if you think about PEQ 2 and Comp 01, the mixer comp and eq ported to single devices are already upgrades to those. So i guess at least half of what you proposed on your list, already has an update in the form of a new, big, stronger, and better sounding device, imho.
I don't consider any of the new bigger version devices as un update to the old mini utilities.
(...)
But they in fact are, they are stil very small footprint devices.
And id8 was result of a path deviation.

I stand by that opinion. That being said, and in case that part of my post got drowned in the rest, my take is that RS should continue a good evolution of the sequencer. And by that i mean, an evolution with new functionality. Not changing colors, or putting the same things on different places (i still believe what they did to the toolbox and the editor is a mess).

User avatar
hamsterfactor
Posts: 123
Joined: 22 Nov 2020

18 Sep 2024

Wishful thinking, as RS has their work cut out for them fixing Reason 13.
:reason: Suite 11  |  :reason: 12 perpetual license  |  :reason: 13 for testing  |  :re::refill: |  macOS Sonoma  |  Mac Studio M1 Max

Popey
Competition Winner
Posts: 2232
Joined: 04 Jul 2018

18 Sep 2024

I would like pulsar lfo to get some love but instead of just lfo have it expanded into a lfo/mseg/envelope device with a number of different options (say 8 lfo's, 8 msegs etc).

That way it is a good utility device for modulation.

User avatar
dioxide
Posts: 1827
Joined: 15 Jul 2015

18 Sep 2024

hamsterfactor wrote:
18 Sep 2024
Wishful thinking, as RS has their work cut out for them fixing Reason 13.
I'm not sure if any of us believe any of this would actually happen.

User avatar
Loque
Moderator
Posts: 11373
Joined: 28 Dec 2015

18 Sep 2024

Just add some basic features which ppl asking for decades and I am happy. As an example why has the EQ no CV control for everything? Or the Matrix no automation control for everything? Sigh...
Reason13, Win10

User avatar
bxbrkrz
Posts: 3986
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

18 Sep 2024

If you replace the word 'legacy' with either 'vintage' or 'classic' the value of these devices gets better and better over time, as is.
757365206C6F67696320746F207365656B20616E73776572732075736520726561736F6E20746F2066696E6420776973646F6D20676574206F7574206F6620796F757220636F6D666F7274207A6F6E65206F7220796F757220696E737069726174696F6E2077696C6C206372797374616C6C697A6520666F7265766572

User avatar
eusti
Moderator
Posts: 2801
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

18 Sep 2024

Maybe include sysex handling for the Midioutput Device?

Abstrax
Posts: 188
Joined: 16 Jan 2015

18 Sep 2024

this poll seems ill-advised. because yaknow whatever wins will be put last on the list of things that actually happen lol

Steedus
Competition Winner
Posts: 1102
Joined: 31 Aug 2015
Location: Melbourne, AU

18 Sep 2024

The Matrix > After using Robotic Bean's Sequencer, The Matrix could be improve a lot (doesn't need to have every feature of Sequencer, but more could be added for sure.

Auto Retro Trans > Could easily make a sequel device to this with different snapshots of effects (having more than 16 effects might make it too busy).

Redrum > I still think a simple Force mono button for each channel would be great for when you load a sample that's stereo but doesn't need to be. Also a reverse button per channel too :)

michael.jaye
Posts: 313
Joined: 18 Jan 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

19 Sep 2024

ECF-42 Envelope Controlled Filter - to include notch and high pass filter types

COMP-01 Compressor/Limiter to include sidechain input

User avatar
huggermugger
Posts: 1489
Joined: 16 Jul 2021

19 Sep 2024

Matrix, the most-voted item in this poll, is easily outgunned by Robotic Bean's excellent Step sequencer. It has a Conditions lane, an extra CV Curve lane, scales, step-recording, rests and ties, seven different playback modes, shuffle on not only 16ths, but also 8ths and 1/4s, step repeat and ratchet options, global editing of gate width and velocity, visualization of events in non-displayed octaves, realtime MIDI control of pitch and scale, numerous CV inputs and outputs on the back, and even a CV pitch quantizer.
Attachments
Screenshot 2024-09-19 at 11.46.38 AM.png
Screenshot 2024-09-19 at 11.46.38 AM.png (136.06 KiB) Viewed 2671 times
Screenshot 2024-09-19 at 11.46.47 AM.png
Screenshot 2024-09-19 at 11.46.47 AM.png (333.87 KiB) Viewed 2671 times

Mataya
Posts: 579
Joined: 03 May 2019

19 Sep 2024

This goes for almost all devices in Reason. Just find a better Re, buy it and be happy. I doubt they'll ever update anything. (cos of the implications)

Step note recorder needs a randomizer. Also the ability to just enter a note without the need of recording into it first. Every device need a randomizer actually.

M

User avatar
zoidkirb
Posts: 757
Joined: 18 Nov 2018
Location: Brisbane Australia
Contact:

19 Sep 2024

Voted for Spider cv splitter/merger update. Having multiple ins and outs per connection like how vcv and cherry modular handle things would be nice.

Also voted for dr Rex upgrade. It works fine now the addition of some of Mimics sample manipulation features would be good.

User avatar
huggermugger
Posts: 1489
Joined: 16 Jul 2021

19 Sep 2024

Mataya wrote:
19 Sep 2024

Step note recorder needs a randomizer. Also the ability to just enter a note without the need of recording into it first. Every device need a randomizer actually.

M
You don't need to record into Step to enable mouse entry. Just set the pattern length and go.


User avatar
huggermugger
Posts: 1489
Joined: 16 Jul 2021

19 Sep 2024

zoidkirb wrote:
19 Sep 2024
Voted for Spider cv splitter/merger update. Having multiple ins and outs per connection like how vcv and cherry modular handle things would be nice.
VM's method is super. Just give all the CV I/O's in Reason that feature. Then you don't need Spiders so often, if at all. They're clumsier than just patching direct.

User avatar
zoidkirb
Posts: 757
Joined: 18 Nov 2018
Location: Brisbane Australia
Contact:

19 Sep 2024

huggermugger wrote:
19 Sep 2024
zoidkirb wrote:
19 Sep 2024
Voted for Spider cv splitter/merger update. Having multiple ins and outs per connection like how vcv and cherry modular handle things would be nice.
VM's method is super. Just give all the CV I/O's in Reason that feature. Then you don't need Spiders so often, if at all. They're clumsier than just patching direct.
Yep i was almost gonna write that an update to the actual cv patching method could eliminate mostly the need for Spider.
I feel RS will probably never touch this stuff again as they aren't passionate about CV anymore and would be scared to break something updating a feature they probably see as neiche.

jlgrimes
Posts: 679
Joined: 06 Jun 2017

22 Sep 2024

mcatalao wrote:
17 Sep 2024
First and foremost, the last 3 batch of effects and instruments RS included in Reason 11, 12 and 13 answeer a lot of the older effects.

So stuff like DDL 1, Phaser, chorus, etc will not have a 2.0 version, imho. From that list at most, i think we will have some sort of Matrix 2.0 in the form of a player, not a CV device.

RPG8, already has a more advanced arpeggiator as a player, and it can work single or dual mode. So I don't see either the need or any way to that happen.

ID8 is a path deviation from the Record times. I think all its sounds exist in NN-XT, or sampled refills and NN-XT is by all meanings 1000x more advanced and more versatile than ID8. So instead of ID8, i think reason studio should think about upgrading NN-XT or have a newer multi sampled sampler. Mimic, despite being quite a workhorse, lacks a lot functionality for nn-xt! If possible with hd streamming.

And if you think about PEQ 2 and Comp 01, the mixer comp and eq ported to single devices are already upgrades to those. So i guess at least half of what you proposed on your list, already has an update in the form of a new, big, stronger, and better sounding device, imho.

Where i think reason studios should invest is the sequencer, and there was a small one in this version, thoug i think it its a pale effort for the things i think are missing in the sequencer.

A good start would be:

- Track Folders
- Auto Punch in/Out
- Retrospective Recording (midi at least)
- Track Freezing

Cheers!
Id8 is a useful device. Great for playing live keys in a band as you can fairly quickly find useful sounds without being bombarded by options.

It is not the same as NNXT as ID8 presets usually aren't bone dry and have useful macro controls. Somewhat like a mini combinator.

If Props upgrade it too much it becomes harder to find sounds quickly but it could at least get up to full GM spec or Roland GS spec.

Marc64
Posts: 788
Joined: 24 Jan 2015
Location: Sweden
Contact:

22 Sep 2024

In Thor with drag to destination from the matrix would be nice like the new synths. Also copy stepsequencer to track.

Also click to add value on every device instead of changing with the mouse.

Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: deigm and 26 guests