Hey all,
I was just wondering why I still get FM when modulating a carrier that has a ratio/frequency of 0.00. Is this a bug in Algoritm? It would make sense for there to be no sound at all, and when the modulator is 0.00 there's no change, except if I modulate the 0.00 modulator.
This is a little confusing, and pretty cool, but I just want to understand what's going on.
Thanks
A question about FM synth ratios and Algoritm
-
- Posts: 794
- Joined: 30 Sep 2021
if the operator is 0.0 and the carrier is 1 you will hear 1. if both are zero you hear nothing.thedjjudah wrote: ↑30 Jul 2024Hey all,
I was just wondering why I still get FM when modulating a carrier that has a ratio/frequency of 0.00. Is this a bug in Algoritm? It would make sense for there to be no sound at all, and when the modulator is 0.00 there's no change, except if I modulate the 0.00 modulator.
This is a little confusing, and pretty cool, but I just want to understand what's going on.
Thanks
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
I think the question is about when the operator is 1.0 and carrier is 0.0 though. It's not immediately clear to me what's happening in that situation. It's definitely not silent.mimidancer wrote: ↑31 Jul 2024if the operator is 0.0 and the carrier is 1 you will hear 1. if both are zero you hear nothing.thedjjudah wrote: ↑30 Jul 2024Hey all,
I was just wondering why I still get FM when modulating a carrier that has a ratio/frequency of 0.00. Is this a bug in Algoritm? It would make sense for there to be no sound at all, and when the modulator is 0.00 there's no change, except if I modulate the 0.00 modulator.
This is a little confusing, and pretty cool, but I just want to understand what's going on.
Thanks
-
- Posts: 794
- Joined: 30 Sep 2021
if the modulater is at zero but the carrier is on you will just hear the carrier unmodulated. 0+1=1 get it?Pepin wrote: ↑31 Jul 2024I think the question is about when the operator is 1.0 and carrier is 0.0 though. It's not immediately clear to me what's happening in that situation. It's definitely not silent.mimidancer wrote: ↑31 Jul 2024
if the operator is 0.0 and the carrier is 1 you will hear 1. if both are zero you hear nothing.
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
I understand that much, but OP is asking about the carrier frequency being zero not the modulator (e.g. carrier 0, modulator 1).mimidancer wrote: ↑31 Jul 2024if the modulater is at zero but the carrier is on you will just hear the carrier unmodulated. 0+1=1 get it?
-
- Posts: 794
- Joined: 30 Sep 2021
if the modulator is at 1 and the carrier is at 0 you will hear the modulator so long as it is at audio rates. M+C=sound heard so 1+0=1 you hear the carrier or 0+1=1 you hear the modulator. the operators and carriers are summed. Understand? so long as one of them has frequency you will hear something. The actual formula takes in the amplitude as well. it is x(t)=A(t)cos[ωct+I(t)cos(ωmt+ϕm)+ϕc] or break it into y(t) = A cos(2πfct + kf∫t x(α)dα + φ0) A is the ampitude kf is the frequency alteration as a constant and φ0 is the phase offset. followed by. f(t) = C + D sin(2πMt) this lets C is the pitch of the carrier and D is the depth of modulation. Basically the amount of modulation. But if you just look at one carrier and one modulator it is easy to hear as 0+1=1 or 1+0=1.Pepin wrote: ↑31 Jul 2024I understand that much, but OP is asking about the carrier frequency being zero not the modulator (e.g. carrier 0, modulator 1).mimidancer wrote: ↑31 Jul 2024
if the modulater is at zero but the carrier is on you will just hear the carrier unmodulated. 0+1=1 get it?
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
I'm far from an expert on this, but I guess I'm struggling to apply your explanations to the actual behavior of Algoritm.mimidancer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2024if the modulator is at 1 and the carrier is at 0 you will hear the modulator so long as it is at audio rates. M+C=sound heard so 1+0=1 you hear the carrier or 0+1=1 you hear the modulator. the operators and carriers are summed. Understand? so long as one of them has frequency you will hear something. The actual formula takes in the amplitude as well. it is x(t)=A(t)cos[ωct+I(t)cos(ωmt+ϕm)+ϕc] or break it into y(t) = A cos(2πfct + kf∫t x(α)dα + φ0) A is the ampitude kf is the frequency alteration as a constant and φ0 is the phase offset. followed by. f(t) = C + D sin(2πMt) this lets C is the pitch of the carrier and D is the depth of modulation. Basically the amount of modulation. But if you just look at one carrier and one modulator it is easy to hear as 0+1=1 or 1+0=1.
If you set this up, you don't just hear the modulator. Can you explain why that is?
No other FM synth I've used actually lets you set an operator's frequency to 0.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 794
- Joined: 30 Sep 2021
Easy peasy. you are not taking into account the amplitude. Set the volumes on both operators to 12 o'clock. then switch them back and forth. if you are adding amplitude it will create harmonics. raising the volumes adds harmonic distortion.Pepin wrote: ↑01 Aug 2024I'm far from an expert on this, but I guess I'm struggling to apply your explanations to the actual behavior of Algoritm.mimidancer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2024
if the modulator is at 1 and the carrier is at 0 you will hear the modulator so long as it is at audio rates. M+C=sound heard so 1+0=1 you hear the carrier or 0+1=1 you hear the modulator. the operators and carriers are summed. Understand? so long as one of them has frequency you will hear something. The actual formula takes in the amplitude as well. it is x(t)=A(t)cos[ωct+I(t)cos(ωmt+ϕm)+ϕc] or break it into y(t) = A cos(2πfct + kf∫t x(α)dα + φ0) A is the ampitude kf is the frequency alteration as a constant and φ0 is the phase offset. followed by. f(t) = C + D sin(2πMt) this lets C is the pitch of the carrier and D is the depth of modulation. Basically the amount of modulation. But if you just look at one carrier and one modulator it is easy to hear as 0+1=1 or 1+0=1.
If you set this up, you don't just hear the modulator. Can you explain why that is?
No other FM synth I've used actually lets you set an operator's frequency to 0.
alg.png
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Thanks, you're right I was forgetting about the carrier's amp still being applied despite the 0 frequency.mimidancer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2024Easy peasy. you are not taking into account the amplitude. Set the volumes on both operators to 12 o'clock. then switch them back and forth. if you are adding amplitude it will create harmonics. raising the volumes adds harmonic distortion.Pepin wrote: ↑01 Aug 2024
I'm far from an expert on this, but I guess I'm struggling to apply your explanations to the actual behavior of Algoritm.
If you set this up, you don't just hear the modulator. Can you explain why that is?
No other FM synth I've used actually lets you set an operator's frequency to 0.
alg.png
-
- RE Developer
- Posts: 12045
- Joined: 15 Jan 2015
- Location: The NorthWoods, CT, USA
One thing that's interesting, and that I can't explain, is the difference between both modulator and carrier at "1" vs mod @ 1 and car @ "0". The former is all (even AND odd) harmonics while the latter is just odd.
From what I can gather (the manual never mentioned a ratio of zero), it is indeed what you would expect: a ratio of zero equals DC (no "frequency"). But this is only measurable in waveforms other than sine, where a ratio of zero outputs a full negative DC signal. You can see this by recording the output to a new audio track. But a sine wave outputs nothing (AFAICT) at a Frequency Ratio of zero, so I'm not sure what exactly is going on.
Anyone with further insights?
From what I can gather (the manual never mentioned a ratio of zero), it is indeed what you would expect: a ratio of zero equals DC (no "frequency"). But this is only measurable in waveforms other than sine, where a ratio of zero outputs a full negative DC signal. You can see this by recording the output to a new audio track. But a sine wave outputs nothing (AFAICT) at a Frequency Ratio of zero, so I'm not sure what exactly is going on.
Anyone with further insights?
Selig Audio, LLC
-
- Posts: 794
- Joined: 30 Sep 2021
would you screengrab the output and the synth itself? I'm always up for a mystery. I love scooby doo.selig wrote: ↑02 Aug 2024One thing that's interesting, and that I can't explain, is the difference between both modulator and carrier at "1" vs mod @ 1 and car @ "0". The former is all (even AND odd) harmonics while the latter is just odd.
From what I can gather (the manual never mentioned a ratio of zero), it is indeed what you would expect: a ratio of zero equals DC (no "frequency"). But this is only measurable in waveforms other than sine, where a ratio of zero outputs a full negative DC signal. You can see this by recording the output to a new audio track. But a sine wave outputs nothing (AFAICT) at a Frequency Ratio of zero, so I'm not sure what exactly is going on.
Anyone with further insights?
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 13 Aug 2024
It sounds like what you're experiencing isn't a bug but rather how the modulation process works in Algoritm. Even with a frequency ratio of 0.00, the modulator can still affect the carrier, creating changes in the sound. The modulation introduces phase changes, which can result in FM-like effects. It's a bit counterintuitive, but that's likely why you're still hearing FM.my perfect hotel
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests