bxbrkrz wrote: ↑29 Mar 2023
I have no doubt this was the perfect cost saving move from Levi's. The same way photographers ...
They were never modelling every body shape and skin tone, so I'm not following your line of reasoning.
It's impossible to model every type of body shape, size and skin tone.
This is not "cost-saving". They never had 1,000 models for every item of clothing.
bxbrkrz wrote: ↑29 Mar 2023
models will be a thing of the past, replaced by pixels.
This is just a replacement for
changing rooms.
bxbrkrz wrote: ↑29 Mar 2023
So I buy something on Amazon. It does not fit. I have to send it back. How much $ is Amazon wasting.
None. The seller has to pay. I'm sure you can see how this could be a problem for sellers.
bxbrkrz wrote: ↑29 Mar 2023
Analog Rooms will be phased out with the annihilation of physical stores. All replaced with Home Smart Fitting Rooms. Logical Evolution of the new gamification of Life with pixels.
If you find it difficult to make online purchases then you can still buy things at stores. If there's a need for it, there will be an outlet for it.
bxbrkrz wrote: ↑29 Mar 2023
Call it 'Diversity' and people will love it as if it was hara-kiri candies.
That's silly.
Right now, it's just not an option to buy for some people.
They don't "love it" because it's 'diversity'. It's just that this is the first time they'll have a reasonable indication of how something will look on them before buying, which had always been an issue for them.
Black people couldn't get makeup designed for their skin tones. When Rihanna offered makeup that was designed to suit their skin tones, it wasn't because it was "called 'Diversity'", it was because this was the first time they were able to get something that wasn't a
bad fit. That company is worth over a billion dollars. Not because of "diversity", but because "other" people could finally buy something that works well for them.
Just like really tall people. They can't wear normal-sized shoes.
Are you saying it's "just diversity" if someone caters for tall or short people?
It's not "just diversity" to realize that tall people need to buy shoes any more than it's "just diversity" to realize that people of different body types and skin tones need to buy clothes that suit them.
Are you saying people with different skin tones should not be served by the market?
I don't get what's so difficult to understand about some people having needs you don't?
I have to wonder if you're trying to not understand on purpose. My writing was very clear
And I've noticed this very often from you, so it could just be a language barrier.