Yep, there's that, and then there are DACs that might have some pleasing saturation. Soft-clipping and auto-gain control (simple compression/limiting) are incredibly cheap to add to an analogue circuit.Jac459 wrote: ↑27 Jan 2023I want to clarify something obvious but it seems some got confused about it.
The fact that software can produce as good and rich sound than hardware with the same quality is a given, we can debate if it is since 10 or 20 years but it is a fact. Done.
Now when some people are saying that their hardware synth sound better than the same VST, it is in fact ... absolutely possible and probably the case. But the reason is just the DAC they are using to listen to.
In one case they use professional DAC to connect the synth to a music interface.
In one case they may use the poor shitty DAC of their laptops ..
But that only impact the way they can listen to it. The final quality of the master is not affected by the DAC quality of the PC...
And there just happens to be an RE/VST that emulates the AKAI S950.
There are some other REs:
- Oenkenstein Audio: Rumblit Bit Crusher Effect (£34)
- Bcase: One Bit Converter (£58)
- They put a lot of work into compiling their 32MB ROM and creating tones through subtle combinations of waveforms (and there was probably a fair amount of processing to make the samples work).
- DA/AD converters can add some pleasing saturation - especially when driven hot.
Mice are indirect. You have to think about moving a pointer around the screen by moving this thing on your desk with your arm rather than just touching it on the screen. Knobs don't feel as indirect. I think that plays a massive role.