


What is this Instagram Q&A that you speak of? Was there an email about that?jamespember wrote: ↑03 Dec 2021We are obviously aware we could've sent the email out at the same time as the blog post. However, we chose to put the email out to coincide with the Q&A that went out on Instagram at the same time. So users could ask questions of David just after having read the email. The reason this happened after the original blog post posting is that we didn't want to do the Instagram Q&A in the middle of all the Black Friday Week noise.
We used the "ask us anything" feature in Instagram Stories to collect questions. We've got hundreds of questions now, you'll see answers go out next week I'd suspect. Make sure to follow us on IG!michael.jaye wrote: ↑04 Dec 2021What is this Instagram Q&A that you speak of? Was there an email about that?jamespember wrote: ↑03 Dec 2021We are obviously aware we could've sent the email out at the same time as the blog post. However, we chose to put the email out to coincide with the Q&A that went out on Instagram at the same time. So users could ask questions of David just after having read the email. The reason this happened after the original blog post posting is that we didn't want to do the Instagram Q&A in the middle of all the Black Friday Week noise.
IMHO, as someone who does this kind of thing for a living, you should have sent the email at the same time as the blog post and then, if you wanted to subsequently remind people so that they could refresh their memories, included a link back to it when promoting the Q&A. Hope you'll at least consider something like that next time. Thanks.jamespember wrote: ↑03 Dec 2021We are obviously aware we could've sent the email out at the same time as the blog post. However, we chose to put the email out to coincide with the Q&A that went out on Instagram at the same time. So users could ask questions of David just after having read the email. The reason this happened after the original blog post posting is that we didn't want to do the Instagram Q&A in the middle of all the Black Friday Week noise.michael.jaye wrote: ↑02 Dec 2021In the year of our lord 2021, there is no reason an email can't be sent *instantly*, say for example, as soon as the blog was posted.
Really looks unprofessional.
Perhaps a dedicated tape emulation or a classic compressor like RE2A.
Not in a million years do I think this is it, but I don't see where any software company has ever done the Uni-vibe any justice. There's something about its unique circuitry that software has never been able to replicate, IMO. Of course lots of people feel the same about Leslie simulations.
Audiority, IKMultimedia, Turn2on.scotward57 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2021I don't see where any software company has ever done the Uni-vibe any justice.
Hahahahahahahahahaha. Best comment so far today.bxbrkrz wrote: ↑13 Dec 2021'it is a modern take on a classic effect, planned for early 2022. Co-founder and DSP guru Peter is locked away in the lab cooking up something amazing. We’re not quite ready to share more details yet but we think you’ll really like it!'
Maybe a RS Random Roadmap Generator?
I would think most DAWS are backwards compatible especially if bouncing synths to audio. And self containing samples.earwig83 wrote: ↑22 Nov 2021At the end of the day, my expressed frustrations are due to a profound love for this program. It's funny, because it was always a bit of a a slippery slope for me. When it came to choosing and staying with Reason, it was because I truly believed in a lot of Reason's usage paradigms and continue to believe in them strongly.EnochLight wrote: ↑22 Nov 2021
That's a good approach, especially if you've invested 20 years into Reason.![]()
![]()
The driving force however is that Reason has always touted their backwards compatibility and that is something I really took as a serious value proposition as a long-term hobbyist with hundreds and hundreds of stems spanning years. The ability to always be able to open old files and continue right where I left off really is something special that very few other DAWS offer in any real parallel. I remember getting burned early on by cubase and immediately swore off big DAWs and took a shine to Reason. Despite the lack of wave editing at the time, there was still everything I needed to make electronic music and technically, there still is!
That has all now since slightly changed things with VST introductions but still, Reason manages to contain everything in a way that is really convenient and cool. I'm able to open songs from 20 years ago and nothing really changes, yet so much has been added!
But there is a caveat, it has trapped a large part of my musical explorations in a proprietary format that looks to be heading toward subscriptions and potentially other kinds of things I may not like. Who knows... such is life, but I can't simply just jump ship and not at least try to make a little bit of a stink with the others who are feeling disillusioned by Reason Studios two steps forward, one step back approach. I'm still hoping in between my complaints.
After all this time they finally tell us what we really want to hear - then take it away and just stop talking about it.
was willing to take the risk on the VSTs for the ability to finally use them with reason.jlgrimes wrote: ↑19 Dec 2021I would think most DAWS are backwards compatible especially if bouncing synths to audio. And self containing samples.earwig83 wrote: ↑22 Nov 2021
At the end of the day, my expressed frustrations are due to a profound love for this program. It's funny, because it was always a bit of a a slippery slope for me. When it came to choosing and staying with Reason, it was because I truly believed in a lot of Reason's usage paradigms and continue to believe in them strongly.
The driving force however is that Reason has always touted their backwards compatibility and that is something I really took as a serious value proposition as a long-term hobbyist with hundreds and hundreds of stems spanning years. The ability to always be able to open old files and continue right where I left off really is something special that very few other DAWS offer in any real parallel. I remember getting burned early on by cubase and immediately swore off big DAWs and took a shine to Reason. Despite the lack of wave editing at the time, there was still everything I needed to make electronic music and technically, there still is!
That has all now since slightly changed things with VST introductions but still, Reason manages to contain everything in a way that is really convenient and cool. I'm able to open songs from 20 years ago and nothing really changes, yet so much has been added!
But there is a caveat, it has trapped a large part of my musical explorations in a proprietary format that looks to be heading toward subscriptions and potentially other kinds of things I may not like. Who knows... such is life, but I can't simply just jump ship and not at least try to make a little bit of a stink with the others who are feeling disillusioned by Reason Studios two steps forward, one step back approach. I'm still hoping in between my complaints.
VSTs are the biggest culprits especially as they go to newer versions.
At some point you update Kontakt 5 to Kontakt 6 and no longer put 5 on your new machine. Some VSTS like Omnisphere new versions are the same plugin as the old version to help support backwards compatibility.
it's a terrible company. they simply are protecting their own interests. they are no longer a darling in this space.
It's going fine as far as I can tell.
It was fixed in 12.2.1
This is in the release notes:
Remote maps utilizing the old insert effects section in the Mixer now forwards this to the first four controls and buttons on a Combinator in the Insert FX section if applicable
Users browsing this forum: Trendiction [Bot] and 13 guests