Reason Studios updates their roadmap (November 17, 2021)
-
- Posts: 4056
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017
- Location: Norway
Looking forward to the bass line generator! I hope it is not only for acid style bass though (sorry fellow Reason talker who wishes it is a rebirth style sequencer. ) I really hope it isn't just that
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 11335
- Joined: 28 Dec 2015
Agree. I instantly thought about a real bass with sliding notes, but this is not possible as a Player, except someone smart adds a CV out for controlling a pitch bend or other CV signals for controlling like MW (np devs, you can pay me later for this idea...).PhillipOrdonez wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021Looking forward to the bass line generator! I hope it is not only for acid style bass though (sorry fellow Reason talker who wishes it is a rebirth style sequencer. ) I really hope it isn't just that
Reason13, Win10
-
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: 17 Apr 2015
- Location: Aachen, Germany
As RS is working on it it could possibly be made with a newer SDK version which could allow for more advanced options for players.Loque wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021Agree. I instantly thought about a real bass with sliding notes, but this is not possible as a Player, except someone smart adds a CV out for controlling a pitch bend or other CV signals for controlling like MW (np devs, you can pay me later for this idea...).PhillipOrdonez wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021Looking forward to the bass line generator! I hope it is not only for acid style bass though (sorry fellow Reason talker who wishes it is a rebirth style sequencer. ) I really hope it isn't just that
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 11335
- Joined: 28 Dec 2015
Well, i would appreciate updates to the SDK, but i dont think it would be necessary. There is nothing a "real" bass player could generate beside PW MIDI signals and currently they are monophonic. To be integrated into a Player as full polyphonic, Reason must support new MIDI standard. And since its "only" a bass player (which means monophonic), i speculate some PW magic.
Well, maybe i am wrong, and they add the basic MIDI controllers to the SDK for the Players, even if they are monophonic only. Would probably open up a few new possibilities, which at least would be some kind of "auto routing" instead of CV cabling, because Players do not have cables. I hope we than will see a (free ) Player routing this out to CV, because RS wont do that as we all know
Guess we will see it when its released...
Reason13, Win10
-
- Posts: 729
- Joined: 17 Jun 2015
- Location: Madison, WI
That could certainly be a highly requested enough feature that they could justify pushing back the browser development to include that.
That said, if you’re on MacOS, just tag your patches at the OS level, or at least organize them in a folder structure that makes sense to you.
-
- Posts: 729
- Joined: 17 Jun 2015
- Location: Madison, WI
I use 303 devices (I built a Din Sync RE-303 and am part of the beta team for Audiorealism and it’s ABL3 VST) to generate non-acid baselines. There’s a major amount of beefy low end with the resonance at zero, and the snappiness with lots of ENV mod and a short decay? It’s to die for.PhillipOrdonez wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021Looking forward to the bass line generator! I hope it is not only for acid style bass though (sorry fellow Reason talker who wishes it is a rebirth style sequencer. ) I really hope it isn't just that
-
- Posts: 3961
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
I am on Windows.DJMaytag wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021That could certainly be a highly requested enough feature that they could justify pushing back the browser development to include that.
That said, if you’re on MacOS, just tag your patches at the OS level, or at least organize them in a folder structure that makes sense to you.
You know what, the tagging system could be like on your Mac. "OS level" of Reason.
So you create a Combinator, and a bunch of patches, you right click > tag > new window with multiple options. Tag one patch, tag the whole Combi patch list, if you don't feel inspired for a name tag just tag by color etc... Save tag.
Next, create new Combi, right click > tag, load tag. The browser and tagging system would be closer to the rack, so would your state of mind. No need to jump out and focus on a browser.
Thanks for the inspiration
757365206C6F67696320746F207365656B20616E73776572732075736520726561736F6E20746F2066696E6420776973646F6D20676574206F7574206F6620796F757220636F6D666F7274207A6F6E65206F7220796F757220696E737069726174696F6E2077696C6C206372797374616C6C697A6520666F7265766572
-
- Posts: 632
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Finder tags are a pretty nice solution for user patches, especailly since drag and drop works.
But they don't help with patches that are trapped inside refills or factory banks. And imo those are the ones more in need of tagging, since users don't have control over the naming conventions and folder structure.
But they don't help with patches that are trapped inside refills or factory banks. And imo those are the ones more in need of tagging, since users don't have control over the naming conventions and folder structure.
-
- Posts: 4216
- Joined: 09 Dec 2016
I've been hoping for an official method to unpack refills for ages, I would like to be able to import the massive collection of drum one shots into XO.Pepin wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021Finder tags are a pretty nice solution for user patches, especailly since drag and drop works.
But they don't help with patches that are trapped inside refills or factory banks. And imo those are the ones more in need of tagging, since users don't have control over the naming conventions and folder structure.
-
- Posts: 290
- Joined: 21 Aug 2021
I hadn't thought about this limitation until you said but I think you're right. It's not going to be that great a bassline generator if it can't generate pitch bend and it's all just static notes only.
They really need to update the SDK if Players cannot send MIDI CCs yet...
-
- Posts: 4903
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Stoke-On-Trent, England, UK
It was the only thing I was hoping for seeing as there seems to be no other core daw improvements (featurewise).Pepin wrote: ↑17 Nov 2021Having read the blog post, I'm somewhat reassured to hear they're scrapping the "smart browser" for now. It always seemed like the least important of all the features on the roadmap.
I just hope the bug where the browser doesn't remember collapsed folders is fixed soon. That's actually been the most annoying issue in R12 for me, small as it might seem.
And as for whether R12 is "perfect" for most users, there are bugs in R12 that do affect everyone (such as aforementioned browser issue). So in that sense, it's not perfect. But I think we all know what was meant by that sentence, which is that the show-stopping performance bugs don't affect most users. And that's undoubtedly true.
Reason Studio's 11.3 / Cockos Reaper 6.82 / Cakewalk By Bandlab / Orion 8.6
http://soundcloud.com/creativemind75/iv ... soul-mix-3
-
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 4299
- Joined: 29 Aug 2015
- Location: Sweden
Well the Bassline Generator Player sounds like it could be interesting. It's fun easy-to-use creative devices that's RS strong suit after all. Will probably give that one a spin at some point.
As for the other stuff, I've pretty much lost all my initial interest in upgrading after this drawn out mess. Let me know when it's ready.
As for the other stuff, I've pretty much lost all my initial interest in upgrading after this drawn out mess. Let me know when it's ready.
-
- Posts: 486
- Joined: 04 Mar 2015
I'd be lying if I said I wasn't disappointed by some of these delays, but I have no doubt the core development team is working as hard as they can to get R12 into shape. I think it'll eventually get to where it needs to be, but that's not much consolation for pro users who depend on Reason every day to be as stable and performant as possible. Sticking with R11 over the next 6mo still feels like a pretty sensible way to go.
Music is nothing else but wild sounds civilized into time and tune.
-
- Posts: 158
- Joined: 19 Oct 2021
- Location: Kyiv
Why bother giving us different colours of lipstick and high heels for our combinators, if the functionality of devices is only partially exposed for remote control since forever?
If we are expected to spend time perfecting the combi system as a product, why are we not given all the tools? Are RS afraid we're going to hurt ourselves?
If we are expected to spend time perfecting the combi system as a product, why are we not given all the tools? Are RS afraid we're going to hurt ourselves?
-
- Posts: 4216
- Joined: 09 Dec 2016
Actually that was my first disappointment with R12 and the new combinator but ultimately it has nothing to do with the Reason version or the combinator and is actually the individual device developers who need to make sure that they expose the controls.
Although the controls I was after happened to be Reason Studios devices, but either way it's disappointing that one of the more interesting features are being overlooked especially now that the combinator is capable of housing more controls on its front panel.
Although the controls I was after happened to be Reason Studios devices, but either way it's disappointing that one of the more interesting features are being overlooked especially now that the combinator is capable of housing more controls on its front panel.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Fanboy Shill, Boomertown
I couldn't care less about any new RS Branded devices, at this time. What I really want them to focus on, instead of coming out with 3 or 4 new REs per year (as is their stated goal), is to show some love to the legacy devices and give them all a well-deserved, overdue makeover. Every stock device in Reason should be revisited and improved upon. Why not make them the best they can be? I don't understand their constant need to chase something new, instead of improving what they already have. (Reminds me of my unfinished song/project folder.... but I'm not a company, so it's apples and oranges)
Why not make everything automatable on every device? Running out of targets slots isn't an acceptable excuse, since they are self-imposed in the Reason code, itself. I would absolutely love to see them go thru and modernize their devices instead of making new devices nobody is asking for. I think doing that would excite and please a lot of their userbase. I'm not just talking about automation targets; that's just one example of something that could be improved upon. Seriously, why can't I automate the resolution knob on a Matrix? That's nuts.
Why not make everything automatable on every device? Running out of targets slots isn't an acceptable excuse, since they are self-imposed in the Reason code, itself. I would absolutely love to see them go thru and modernize their devices instead of making new devices nobody is asking for. I think doing that would excite and please a lot of their userbase. I'm not just talking about automation targets; that's just one example of something that could be improved upon. Seriously, why can't I automate the resolution knob on a Matrix? That's nuts.
-
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 521
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Absolutely agree. I don't think there is any new device they could announce that would excite me much. New versions of existing devices though, that would float my boat. Just look at the positivity created by the new combinator.
-
- Posts: 158
- Joined: 19 Oct 2021
- Location: Kyiv
This... Thor, Kong, Maelstrom, Redrum and even the 1-rack devices all have flawed parameter exposition.challism wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021I couldn't care less about any new RS Branded devices, at this time. What I really want them to focus on, instead of coming out with 3 or 4 new REs per year (as is their stated goal), is to show some love to the legacy devices and give them all a well-deserved, overdue makeover. Every stock device in Reason should be revisited and improved upon. Why not make them the best they can be? I don't understand their constant need to chase something new, instead of improving what they already have. (Reminds me of my unfinished song/project folder.... but I'm not a company, so it's apples and oranges)
Why not make everything automatable on every device? Running out of targets slots isn't an acceptable excuse, since they are self-imposed in the Reason code, itself. I would absolutely love to see them go thru and modernize their devices instead of making new devices nobody is asking for. I think doing that would excite and please a lot of their userbase. I'm not just talking about automation targets; that's just one example of something that could be improved upon. Seriously, why can't I automate the resolution knob on a Matrix? That's nuts.
How to let RS know about this? Can we collect signatures or maybe a poll for New Devices vs Improving Stock? Hell, even saying "improving" feels a bit of a stretch, because that's something that MUST HAVE BEEN THERE from day 1. RS guys, if you' are reading this - don't let Mr. Jubel waste his time on something we don't want and then go "well we can't please everybody" when the new device get booed. LISTEN. You CAN please everyone.
P.S.: going through the demos of SKP new Aura combinator refill and it's absolutely mind blowing what he has done with stock devices. Imagine what he can do without these unnecessary limitations.
-
- Posts: 559
- Joined: 21 May 2015
- Location: Melbourne Australia
+100challism wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021I couldn't care less about any new RS Branded devices, at this time. What I really want them to focus on, instead of coming out with 3 or 4 new REs per year (as is their stated goal), is to show some love to the legacy devices and give them all a well-deserved, overdue makeover. Every stock device in Reason should be revisited and improved upon. ...
Because we really need new REs and more Sound Packs yeah..
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Atari 1040ST | R11 Suite 🡭 R12 | i7 | RME
-
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 4299
- Joined: 29 Aug 2015
- Location: Sweden
No no no. Let the old devices be. Thor, Subtractor, Redrum etc. I mean sure, I can agree why not make everything automatable. Other than that, leave them alone. It's time to move on.Hoboys wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021This... Thor, Kong, Maelstrom, Redrum and even the 1-rack devices all have flawed parameter exposition.
How to let RS know about this? Can we collect signatures or maybe a poll for New Devices vs Improving Stock? Hell, even saying "improving" feels a bit of a stretch, because that's something that MUST HAVE BEEN THERE from day 1. RS guys, if you' are reading this - don't let Mr. Jubel waste his time on something we don't want and then go "well we can't please everybody" when the new device get booed. LISTEN. You CAN please everyone.
P.S.: going through the demos of SKP new Aura combinator refill and it's absolutely mind blowing what he has done with stock devices. Imagine what he can do without these unnecessary limitations.
Just look at Europa and Grain. They're much better and more fun devices. New is good.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Fanboy Shill, Boomertown
Maybe it's a Swedish thing? ha ha haTritoneAddiction wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021No no no. Let the old devices be. Thor, Subtractor, Redrum etc. I mean sure, I can agree why not make everything automatable. Other than that, leave them alone. It's time to move on.Hoboys wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021This... Thor, Kong, Maelstrom, Redrum and even the 1-rack devices all have flawed parameter exposition.
How to let RS know about this? Can we collect signatures or maybe a poll for New Devices vs Improving Stock? Hell, even saying "improving" feels a bit of a stretch, because that's something that MUST HAVE BEEN THERE from day 1. RS guys, if you' are reading this - don't let Mr. Jubel waste his time on something we don't want and then go "well we can't please everybody" when the new device get booed. LISTEN. You CAN please everyone.
P.S.: going through the demos of SKP new Aura combinator refill and it's absolutely mind blowing what he has done with stock devices. Imagine what he can do without these unnecessary limitations.
Just look at Europa and Grain. They're much better and more fun devices. New is good.
-
- RE Developer
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: 22 Jan 2015
- Location: 55°09'24.5"N 37°27'41.4"E
Not only. I think the same, so it's a northern thing.challism wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021Maybe it's a Swedish thing? ha ha haTritoneAddiction wrote: ↑20 Nov 2021
No no no. Let the old devices be. Thor, Subtractor, Redrum etc. I mean sure, I can agree why not make everything automatable. Other than that, leave them alone. It's time to move on.
Just look at Europa and Grain. They're much better and more fun devices. New is good.
-
- Posts: 2596
- Joined: 22 Jan 2015
- Location: Bajo del mar...
Why can't they add Free Run to the resolution on a Matrix.
Sorry, one of my pet gripes.
There's the simplicity of the Matrix and then there are all these (in my opinion) bloated super sequencers and even they don't have Randomise and Free Run in the same place.
Never mind...
Perpetual Reason 13 Beta Tester
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
-
- Posts: 4903
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Stoke-On-Trent, England, UK
Well it's a player, not an instrument, so won't be a 303 of any kind. It will just be something that generates bass lines I'm guessing lol!PhillipOrdonez wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021Looking forward to the bass line generator! I hope it is not only for acid style bass though (sorry fellow Reason talker who wishes it is a rebirth style sequencer. ) I really hope it isn't just that
Reason Studio's 11.3 / Cockos Reaper 6.82 / Cakewalk By Bandlab / Orion 8.6
http://soundcloud.com/creativemind75/iv ... soul-mix-3
-
- RE Developer
- Posts: 1264
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Stockholm
Sliding notes have been possible since before Players existed, for example the Matrix in Reason 1.0... Just enable legato mode and auto portamento on the instrument and legato notes will trigger a slide?Loque wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021Agree. I instantly thought about a real bass with sliding notes, but this is not possible as a Player, except someone smart adds a CV out for controlling a pitch bend or other CV signals for controlling like MW (np devs, you can pay me later for this idea...).PhillipOrdonez wrote: ↑19 Nov 2021Looking forward to the bass line generator! I hope it is not only for acid style bass though (sorry fellow Reason talker who wishes it is a rebirth style sequencer. ) I really hope it isn't just that
Or am I missing something?
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests