12db at 1k
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/XOcMtTm.png)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/PM7Zue5.png)
12db at 7k
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/THIROvQ.png)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/XL56DHY.png)
12db at 1k
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/ILgBSkA.png)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/ImqM4XO.png)
12db at 10k
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/4gxmtdv.png)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/eXGObnX.png)
selig wrote: ↑20 Aug 2021I looked into all this with ColoringEQ listening to existing EQs and even finding some EQs that don't show cramping on their display but ARE cramping when you measure them - and yet, I would never have guessed they were cramping because I haven't ever heard this as a "problem". Neither have I heard EQs with no cramping to sound any better because of that one difference, but have certainly not done exhaustive tests in this area.
I would call this a "non-issue" issue since it doesn't seem to stop folks from getting great sounds with EQs using either approach.
SSL EQ will never be outdated!!!chaosroyale wrote: ↑20 Aug 2021yeah I have a lot of problems with Reason's outdated EQs, mostly related to UI and lack of bands, but the less-than perfect cramping response is not really a big deal. Even though I use non-cramping VSTs myself, I would be very hard pressed to notice the difference sonically.
selig wrote: ↑20 Aug 2021I looked into all this with ColoringEQ listening to existing EQs and even finding some EQs that don't show cramping on their display but ARE cramping when you measure them - and yet, I would never have guessed they were cramping because I haven't ever heard this as a "problem". Neither have I heard EQs with no cramping to sound any better because of that one difference, but have certainly not done exhaustive tests in this area.
I would call this a "non-issue" issue since it doesn't seem to stop folks from getting great sounds with EQs using either approach.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests