No.
And the way you talk the last days i am pretty sure, you wont get any offer. Sorry to say that, but i whish you good luck
No.
We're still supporting our REs and working on updates as always. R+ sub allows users basically to have the 'full kaboodle' for RS products at a subscription fee. If they end their subscription, they end up with zip, until/unless they buy a full license of Reason as a DAW (perpetual) so they still get the base stock minus the RSR+ products (which makes sense).
I agree with everything you've said and proposed the same. It seems weird that they would on one hand offer rent to own for devices, but then not do the same for the DAW using Reason+ subscription.pongasoft wrote: ↑28 Jan 2021Since the "main" thread is up to 67 pages long, it is hard to follow and have a constructive discussion. So I wanted to start a thread specifically for developers and get their opinion/point of view.
So I guess I am going to start:
* the announcement of Reason Hi Res is by far the thing that is exciting me a lot since this is something that we have been begging for so long (timeline still unclear but at least it is official it is coming...)
* in terms of Reason+ I am very worried for the impact on REs. I think for the people who stick to the full purchase price it probably won't change much. For newcomers that are going to shell $20 a month for the full Reason and 70+ devices built-in, it is going to be very hard for them to shell more money to buy REs that yes they own, but they become useless the day they stop paying for the subscription although they have bought and paid full price for them.
I can imagine a few avenues that in my mind could alleviate the concerns and help Reason+ subscribers buy REs:
* this is something I have already talked about and reiterate here: release a FREE version of RRP which contains nothing but the rack (and a mixer). That way the RE you have purchased have a chance to be usable if you cancel your subscription and decide to go with another DAW (like if you had bought a VST plugin...)
* if you have subscribed for "long" enough (example, paid for a full year) you should be able to fall back to the latest version of Reason Studio (and fine if you don't get all the 70+ REs that come with it but just the ones that would be included in a non subscription version). For example, I subscribe to Jetbrains toolbox yearly for their IDEs (~$140 a year), and if I stop my subscription, I automatically get a license for the last version of all their tools that was released before my subscription expires. Again that way, the REs you have purchased are still usable even if you cancel your subscription.
* somewhat a mix of both: if you cancel your subscription, you get a license to use RRP only, that way your REs are still valid
* release Reason++ which contains Reason+ and ALL REs (for a higher price obviously) and find a way to pay the developer a fair share... that way you never buy any REs nor Reason, you just lease all of it..
I would appreciate if only developers would chime in and please don't turn it into a flaming war...
Yan
+1challism wrote: ↑30 May 2021
I'm not a developer but I wanted to chime in here and just encourage developers to continue to support the RE market by continuing to develop and release REs and supporting the older ones. We just celebrated the 10 year anniversary of the RE platform. I think it's clear REs aren't going away. And Reason's userbase is growing! That only means more future sales for developers. I, for one will, continue to support your efforts, and I know others will, too. I prefer the RE format over VSTs; it's not even a contest. I would also like to thank you all for what you have done for the RE market in the past; it is very much appreciated. I wish you all success in the future, whatever you decide to do.
Hey there, just wanted to chime in and apologize. I actually tried to clarify my post and apologize for stirring up drama, replying to Lab One's post immediately, but for some reason, that never showed up. Or at least I looked into this thread a few weeks back and noticed it wasn't there and felt like even more of an ass.challism wrote: ↑30 May 2021I'm not a developer but I wanted to chime in here and just encourage developers to continue to support the RE market by continuing to develop and release REs and supporting the older ones. We just celebrated the 10 year anniversary of the RE platform. I think it's clear REs aren't going away. And Reason's userbase is growing! That only means more future sales for developers. I, for one will, continue to support your efforts, and I know others will, too. I prefer the RE format over VSTs; it's not even a contest. I would also like to thank you all for what you have done for the RE market in the past; it is very much appreciated. I wish you all success in the future, whatever you decide to do.
Has some of the most complex CV tools in the shop; calls himself a dumbass! What the hell does that make me? ha ha hastarship wrote: ↑31 May 2021Hey there, just wanted to chime in and apologize. I actually tried to clarify my post and apologize for stirring up drama, replying to Lab One's post immediately, but for some reason, that never showed up. Or at least I looked into this thread a few weeks back and noticed it wasn't there and felt like even more of an ass.challism wrote: ↑30 May 2021I'm not a developer but I wanted to chime in here and just encourage developers to continue to support the RE market by continuing to develop and release REs and supporting the older ones. We just celebrated the 10 year anniversary of the RE platform. I think it's clear REs aren't going away. And Reason's userbase is growing! That only means more future sales for developers. I, for one will, continue to support your efforts, and I know others will, too. I prefer the RE format over VSTs; it's not even a contest. I would also like to thank you all for what you have done for the RE market in the past; it is very much appreciated. I wish you all success in the future, whatever you decide to do.
Personally appreciate the sentiments here from the last 2 posts (only quoted 1)..
I think mainly what concerned me and other devs was the perception that REs were being sidelined via this subscription model, and I was wondering if that situation was resolved or if there were plans to do so. I'm pretty out of the loop.
And honestly, I have had critical messages just not get delivered before in RT, usually because of user error. (i.e. me). I wonder if the interface could use some work to help dumbasses like me not e.g. send mails to nowhere and/or IDK.. post a reply that goes nowhere? IDK what happened there.
But REgardless.. there's a reason I personally wanted to do RE dev.. and that reason was Reason.
Cheers!
LOL!challism wrote: ↑31 May 2021Has some of the most complex CV tools in the shop; calls himself a dumbass! What the hell does that make me? ha ha ha
Don't be too hard on yourself. It is completely understandable the way many Devs felt after R+ was announced. RS made some big mistakes and I think they learned some lessons. And that's actually great, because they are striving to be more transparent now. Hopefully the "shop" link will make itself back to the top of the RS website pretty soon.
Please don't beat yourself up. I didn't think you were coming across as an ass. We are usually much more critical of ourselves than others are (unless you are running a major DAW, then you catch hell from everyone!). If I had a penny for every time I've posted something that made me look like an asshol3.... let's just say, I would own more REs.
my preference as, well... Re re re...
Casual R+ user here. Was on R9/10/11 before that. I own a good handful of REs and am waiting for KUASSA Rectifor RE to release so I can buy that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests