It's an amazing time for any aspiring musician to jump into the game and start composing. Music Theory always helps though ultimately it's like you said. A human still has to guide the momentum and make decisions.zoidkirb wrote: ↑04 Dec 2020Yeah, those snobs can be annoying. The thing is: All the music theory we have, scales, chords, rules for harmony and writing arpeggios etc etc are shortcuts invented by someone else that make it easier for us to create and sculpt musical ideas.TrueStory wrote: ↑03 Dec 2020Core features? Usefulness? etc.
I didn't try the demo yet but it looks pretty cool from the few videos I saw. One thing that cracks me up are the music theory elitists in the youtube comments who seem upset about "AI making music" yet many of these elitists are still in the same position as the rest of us producers and beat makers.
Midi tools like this are just an extension of the same concept IMO. A human still has to guide , choose, edit and arrange whatever melodies this thing can spit out.
I'd like to see one of those guys press one button and hey presto there's a 100% competed track right there.
new Reason Studios Player: Pattern Mutator
Now this is what I've been waiting to hear. There should a video demonstrating this too for those who don't know.buddard wrote: ↑05 Dec 2020You don't need any additional RE for this, since Players always receive MIDI from their instrument track.tobypearce wrote: ↑05 Dec 2020Like others I'd like to be able to mutate midi that's already in the sequencer. I understand that it is not straightforward to get midi from the sequencer in the player. But on page one of this thread it looked like someone had made this work using some kind of CV RE. Was I reading this right, and if so what's the RE I need?
So if you want to mutate a pattern clip, copy it to the track of the instrument that Pattern Mutator is connected to.
Make sure that the pattern length on Mutator matches the length of the clip. (You can test it by playing back the clip and ensuring that Mutator's playhead does exactly one lap in the display)
Then enable record on Mutator and start playback on Reason's main transport.
Note that the recording will be quantized to the rate set on Pattern Mutator.
Here's something you can try with Pattern Mutator... load in an instance of PatMut and record a sequence. Then move it to another instrument (drag it and use SHIFT key -Windows- to enable moving the player to another instrument. Then start trying different mutations on the different instrument. Repeat!
I can use the trail version now for a few hours, and I must say impressive. But: if you give it shit, mutator gives you shit back - meaning you have to feed it with decent sequences and chords. It is not an instant wonderbox or talentbox.
I do like it, but have to think if it is worth the € 74 for me though.
It is usable without manual, just play around and notice what everything does, and it is a lot of fun doing so.
Will it be in Reason 12 (Suite)? I don't know, if you like it and can afford it buy it, otherwise wait 'till 12 LOL.
I do like it, but have to think if it is worth the € 74 for me though.
It is usable without manual, just play around and notice what everything does, and it is a lot of fun doing so.
Will it be in Reason 12 (Suite)? I don't know, if you like it and can afford it buy it, otherwise wait 'till 12 LOL.
Greetings from Miyaru.
Prodaw i7-7700, 16Gb Ram, Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd gen, ESI M4U eX, Reason12, Live Suit 10, Push2, Presonus Eris E8 and Monitor Station V2, Lexicon MPX1,
Korg N1, Yamaha RM1x
Prodaw i7-7700, 16Gb Ram, Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 3rd gen, ESI M4U eX, Reason12, Live Suit 10, Push2, Presonus Eris E8 and Monitor Station V2, Lexicon MPX1,
Korg N1, Yamaha RM1x
There is one major element that keeps me from liking that kind of tool: the seed for the mutations is beyond my reach, locked away. The results will never be "me".
757365206C6F67696320746F207365656B20616E73776572732075736520726561736F6E20746F2066696E6420776973646F6D20676574206F7574206F6620796F757220636F6D666F7274207A6F6E65206F7220796F757220696E737069726174696F6E2077696C6C206372797374616C6C697A6520666F7265766572
Well, you can use it to spawn ideas. You can "send to track" and move the notes around or cut what you don't like. So you *can* make it sound like you.
It would be nice if I could lock parts of my ideas (timing, note length, etc) separately from 0 to 100% (to the magic seed sauce), like a groove mixer. So you push it a bit, and if you don't like it you bring it back down. Then you lock another element, the timing between notes for example, and you try again. If you bring all the faders down to 0% you get your originel idea. This player is close to what I want, but I'll wait for the next 'version'.
757365206C6F67696320746F207365656B20616E73776572732075736520726561736F6E20746F2066696E6420776973646F6D20676574206F7574206F6620796F757220636F6D666F7274207A6F6E65206F7220796F757220696E737069726174696F6E2077696C6C206372797374616C6C697A6520666F7265766572
This is fine as a scratch pad for testing ideas and for a different price I would get it, but for that much money and no intro it just does not do enough. It is very clunky to use for me in a full track. MIDI import would help a lot, for example. I use Ableton a lot and max4live has some brilliant randomizers that have been more than worth the money and effort.
It's always "you" in the end, though.
Ultimately it is YOU who decides whether or not given variation represents your style, mood, idea; whether it fits the track you're making or not. If it's not "you", then by the same token it's not you when you get inspired by other music, a view you saw, a discussion you had, a book you've read, which would be kind of ridiculous, right?
So, 2-3 weeks later and at a reduced price - is it worth getting?
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: 31 Jul 2019
Wait until Black Friday.DougalDarkly wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020Asking myself the same question - along with 'can I wait until May Madness and maybe get it for half price?'...
I should just trial it and get it over with I guess!
🗲 2ॐ ᛉ
I decided I'll wait for the next evolution of the concept from the dev. I am not against it, it is not ridiculous, but it's not for me. The examples you provided are perfect. When you decide to listen to a track, start a conversation, or replying on a forum you decide the actions, actions that could evolve into a little seed, then, maybe, to a song. You could decide not to get a tool, until you get what you want. It's all psychological. Like what kind of colors a Player in Reason should be. All black, no? All white, yes? Rainbow, maybe?antic604 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020It's always "you" in the end, though.
Ultimately it is YOU who decides whether or not given variation represents your style, mood, idea; whether it fits the track you're making or not. If it's not "you", then by the same token it's not you when you get inspired by other music, a view you saw, a discussion you had, a book you've read, which would be kind of ridiculous, right?
Freedom of the mind inspires absolute inspiration
Mutator is a great tool. Buy it.
757365206C6F67696320746F207365656B20616E73776572732075736520726561736F6E20746F2066696E6420776973646F6D20676574206F7574206F6620796F757220636F6D666F7274207A6F6E65206F7220796F757220696E737069726174696F6E2077696C6C206372797374616C6C697A6520666F7265766572
Hmm suddenly I filled level1 subscribe with various sequencres mutaters and other pattern manglers to find mucking around with the arpegiater on my keyboard produced superior results .Now if only I could root that into....
....
....
Reason 12 ,gear4 music sdp3 stage piano .nektar gxp 88,behringer umc1800 .line6 spider4 30
hear scince reason 2.5
hear scince reason 2.5
This is handy to know, but is there any way to create drag'n drop midi support or a load feature within the confines of the current sdkbuddard wrote: ↑05 Dec 2020You don't need any additional RE for this, since Players always receive MIDI from their instrument track.tobypearce wrote: ↑05 Dec 2020Like others I'd like to be able to mutate midi that's already in the sequencer. I understand that it is not straightforward to get midi from the sequencer in the player. But on page one of this thread it looked like someone had made this work using some kind of CV RE. Was I reading this right, and if so what's the RE I need?
So if you want to mutate a pattern clip, copy it to the track of the instrument that Pattern Mutator is connected to.
Make sure that the pattern length on Mutator matches the length of the clip. (You can test it by playing back the clip and ensuring that Mutator's playhead does exactly one lap in the display)
Then enable record on Mutator and start playback on Reason's main transport.
Note that the recording will be quantized to the rate set on Pattern Mutator.
Nope.Billy wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020This is handy to know, but is there any way to create drag'n drop midi support or a load feature within the confines of the current sdkbuddard wrote: ↑05 Dec 2020
You don't need any additional RE for this, since Players always receive MIDI from their instrument track.
So if you want to mutate a pattern clip, copy it to the track of the instrument that Pattern Mutator is connected to.
Make sure that the pattern length on Mutator matches the length of the clip. (You can test it by playing back the clip and ensuring that Mutator's playhead does exactly one lap in the display)
Then enable record on Mutator and start playback on Reason's main transport.
Note that the recording will be quantized to the rate set on Pattern Mutator.
What about already swung melodies, anyway to keep their timing/feel. I'm guessing if I set 16th and record a melody line it's going to be quantised to the grid.
Yes, Mutator is a step based sequencer, so all patterns are quantized. You’ll have to use the built-in shuffle control to add swing during playback.
I wonder about the mutation algorithm - is it fully random (say, like QNG), or is it based on some pre-made templates and the algorithm maps the original sequence onto them and makes variations (a bit like Drum Map)?
Ive not tried the Player myself yet, but everything I've heard sounds very usable unlike QNG that can be pretty hit or miss (but also very brilliant when it hits just right).
Ive not tried the Player myself yet, but everything I've heard sounds very usable unlike QNG that can be pretty hit or miss (but also very brilliant when it hits just right).
Thanks you are really helpful answering questions so quickly.
Why was the steps limited to 99? I like working in 8 bar phrases and by reckoning 99 steps at 16th is about 6 bars.
-
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
How are you finding the mutation? I take it you have mutator?
I'm thinking about it but I'm not sure I will get what I want from it.
-
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
I like it, however I've not had much time to play with it. But it is a nice tool to have and should help writing music faster; I got a client that I will need a lot of songs done quickly for and that was the motivation for me to get it. The results are usable and you can quickly get a couple of nice variations. Trial it and figure out if it is for you or not. It's the only way.
Would be interested to know how you a using it, I'm assuming it's going to need to be part of a stack to get a good initial idea going.PhillipOrdonez wrote: ↑22 Dec 2020I like it, however I've not had much time to play with it. But it is a nice tool to have and should help writing music faster; I got a client that I will need a lot of songs done quickly for and that was the motivation for me to get it. The results are usable and you can quickly get a couple of nice variations. Trial it and figure out if it is for you or not. It's the only way.
-
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
It depends. I've written a melody then put it through the mutator to get variations. Or a chord progression. Or I've used a midi from a sample pack and turned into something new. The initial idea is something that comes before the mutator, I think. From there, the sky's the limit with players: stack, rearrange, sent to track, mutate again... Whatever!Billy wrote: ↑22 Dec 2020Would be interested to know how you a using it, I'm assuming it's going to need to be part of a stack to get a good initial idea going.PhillipOrdonez wrote: ↑22 Dec 2020
I like it, however I've not had much time to play with it. But it is a nice tool to have and should help writing music faster; I got a client that I will need a lot of songs done quickly for and that was the motivation for me to get it. The results are usable and you can quickly get a couple of nice variations. Trial it and figure out if it is for you or not. It's the only way.
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests