Is that confirmed? Because there are several possible reasons for reduction in fog levels, including a generally warmer climate which could prevent fog from forming.reggie1979 wrote: ↑23 Apr 2019Well, consider this. In my area we now don't have fog like we used to. The cause? Cleaner air. The thermal inversion in the winter is different now than it used to be because all the solar and better farming techniques (as well as greener/cleaner cars and people putting in more energy efficient appliances/windows/etc) has reduced smog and emissions.
From what I've been told, even LA is better than it's ever been but I don't live there so I don't know.
Some states are just not conscious and thus have problems. I'm no expert other that what is happening in my area which are changing all the time.
Climate Change [Solved!]
-
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: 11 Apr 2019
Apparently. I didn't do the fact checking myself though
Today it's well into the 90's. It's a record. Mother nature will do what she wants to
Today it's well into the 90's. It's a record. Mother nature will do what she wants to
This thread makes me sad. I haven't the strength to oppose the mind numbing ignorance some people express.
-
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: 11 Apr 2019
What? I thought the thread was going fine and now it's the "how stupid are all of you" bomb.
I should have known it was going to happen, you can't talk about this kinda thing w/o someone playing that kinda card.
I should have known it was going to happen, you can't talk about this kinda thing w/o someone playing that kinda card.
-
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: 11 Apr 2019
I mean seriously, if you are so lazy that you come into an DISCUSSION and call everyone/or anyone out as being ignorant, and that you don't have the time, fwho has respect for that? I sure as hell do not. Please, enlighten everyone with your undoubted expertise.
Or are you just another "climate change nut" who spouts off how awful everyone is and how despite giving facts from people smarter than YOU, you just buck the system and spout idealogical nonsensical incomprehensions?
Yeah, me thinks you are.
Or are you just another "climate change nut" who spouts off how awful everyone is and how despite giving facts from people smarter than YOU, you just buck the system and spout idealogical nonsensical incomprehensions?
Yeah, me thinks you are.
On that note, get the topic back to rational standards again.
Kenni Andruszkow
SoundCloud
SoundCloud
- Creativemind
- Posts: 4875
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Stoke-On-Trent, England, UK
Brilliant. I hope the L.A thing is true.reggie1979 wrote: ↑23 Apr 2019Well, consider this. In my area we now don't have fog like we used to. The cause? Cleaner air. The thermal inversion in the winter is different now than it used to be because all the solar and better farming techniques (as well as greener/cleaner cars and people putting in more energy efficient appliances/windows/etc) has reduced smog and emissions.
From what I've been told, even LA is better than it's ever been but I don't live there so I don't know.
Some states are just not conscious and thus have problems. I'm no expert other that what is happening in my area which are changing all the time.
Reason Studio's 11.3 / Cockos Reaper 6.82 / Cakewalk By Bandlab / Orion 8.6
http://soundcloud.com/creativemind75/iv ... soul-mix-3
I keep going back to Freeman Dyson's pointing out that if we don't understand glacial periods we don't understand climate. And so on.
Admittedly I'm looking for some kind of hope here but still, it's an interesting point.
Admittedly I'm looking for some kind of hope here but still, it's an interesting point.
Perpetual Reason 12 Beta Tester
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
We do have some understanding of glacial periods. Ice cores can give us a lot of insight into this stuff. Nonetheless, understanding the cause of climate change is not a requirement of observing that it is happening. It is objectively true that the climate is changing. It is irrational that deny this. Just because we don’t know why it is changing, this doesn’t mean it isn’t.
I don’t think he was saying that the climate isn’t changing. He just questions how and why.
As for ice core samples, from what I know (and that ain’t much) they give readings about time frames and certain atmospheric conditions at specific times but the overall question remains as to what causes it. Things like interplanetary dust clouds and so on have been put forth.
That’s all I know.
Beyond that I just try to speculate based on what passes for unbiased data.
As for ice core samples, from what I know (and that ain’t much) they give readings about time frames and certain atmospheric conditions at specific times but the overall question remains as to what causes it. Things like interplanetary dust clouds and so on have been put forth.
That’s all I know.
Beyond that I just try to speculate based on what passes for unbiased data.
Perpetual Reason 12 Beta Tester
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
a single volcano and all the calculations need resetting to keep the greens happy
Reason 12 ,gear4 music sdp3 stage piano .nektar gxp 88,behringer umc1800 .line6 spider4 30
hear scince reason 2.5
hear scince reason 2.5
I've always thought they need to come up with a more scary name for all of this. "Global Warming" and "Climate Change" just doesn't sound bad enough to get the attention of the majority. Perhaps "Global Drowning" might work. Or "Global Death and Misery In Icy Darkness". Or how about "It Will Be So Bad You May Not Be Able To Use Social Media Or Watch Reality TV".
I won't argue with you...
You have some facts to work out:
It's Climate vs Weather. The Feels makes one think is Climate Change vs Weather.
It makes little sense to weigh in on this argument.
There are no Facts, Data, or Studies Presented here. Just... Feels.
Next terms to learn, Mashers.... Correlation vs Causation. It'd be helpful in this discussion.
Earth Science and Living Environment Teacher, here.
You have some facts to work out:
It's Climate vs Weather. The Feels makes one think is Climate Change vs Weather.
It makes little sense to weigh in on this argument.
There are no Facts, Data, or Studies Presented here. Just... Feels.
Next terms to learn, Mashers.... Correlation vs Causation. It'd be helpful in this discussion.
Earth Science and Living Environment Teacher, here.
Why is there a left right political divide on this issue?
All the people I know on the 'left' think we're the largest contributer to global warming and all the people I know on the 'right' think it's a load of bullshit.
I know quite a lot of confused people in the middle too.
I have some ideas myselft as to why but I'm curious what everyone here has to say.
For example all the leftie people I know seem to like to emote at shit, so naturally they're gonna get hysterical and potentially over react.
But the all the right wingers I know seem to just want ot rub the left wingers face in shit. And I'm left wondering is anyone is actually taking any of this seriously!
All the people I know on the 'left' think we're the largest contributer to global warming and all the people I know on the 'right' think it's a load of bullshit.
I know quite a lot of confused people in the middle too.
I have some ideas myselft as to why but I'm curious what everyone here has to say.
For example all the leftie people I know seem to like to emote at shit, so naturally they're gonna get hysterical and potentially over react.
But the all the right wingers I know seem to just want ot rub the left wingers face in shit. And I'm left wondering is anyone is actually taking any of this seriously!
Perpetual Reason 12 Beta Tester
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
-
- Posts: 3732
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
Because one side looks at the data and worries about the future. The other only cares about money, so they spew propaganda undermining the facts and making it a partisan thing, It is not their problem now, it is the problem of people in the future, they'll be fine cause they get the big lobby paychecks and their followers eat the whole charade up and decide to believe evil greedy liars over facts.plaamook wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019Why is there a left right political divide on this issue?
All the people I know on the 'left' think we're the largest contributer to global warming and all the people I know on the 'right' think it's a load of bullshit.
I know quite a lot of confused people in the middle too.
I have some ideas myselft as to why but I'm curious what everyone here has to say.
For example all the leftie people I know seem to like to emote at shit, so naturally they're gonna get hysterical and potentially over react.
But the all the right wingers I know seem to just want ot rub the left wingers face in shit. And I'm left wondering is anyone is actually taking any of this seriously!
There's a reason there are experts who study shit like this all the time and they all agree based on evidence that climate is changing and we are causing it since the industrial Revolution and there's a point of no return ahead. There's no arguing against facts. Only lies and corruption and ego. And that is ALL coming from one side alone.
Nah, I think you're reading it wrong.PhillipOrdonez wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019Because one side looks at the data and worries about the future. The other only cares about money, so they spew propaganda undermining the facts and making it a partisan thing, It is not their problem now, it is the problem of people in the future, they'll be fine cause they get the big lobby paychecks and their followers eat the whole charade up and decide to believe evil greedy liars over facts.plaamook wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019Why is there a left right political divide on this issue?
All the people I know on the 'left' think we're the largest contributer to global warming and all the people I know on the 'right' think it's a load of bullshit.
I know quite a lot of confused people in the middle too.
I have some ideas myselft as to why but I'm curious what everyone here has to say.
For example all the leftie people I know seem to like to emote at shit, so naturally they're gonna get hysterical and potentially over react.
But the all the right wingers I know seem to just want ot rub the left wingers face in shit. And I'm left wondering is anyone is actually taking any of this seriously!
There's a reason there are experts who study shit like this all the time and they all agree based on evidence that climate is changing and we are causing it since the industrial Revolution and there's a point of no return ahead. There's no arguing against facts. Only lies and corruption and ego. And that is ALL coming from one side alone.
The people that question the human climate model are not all oil tycoons. There are lots of people that just take different perspectives on the matter that don't stand to gain financially from doing so. Ordinary people if you will. There's a different axis there I think.
Perpetual Reason 12 Beta Tester
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
You can check out my music here.
https://m.soundcloud.com/ericholmofficial
Or here.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC73uZZ ... 8jqUubzsQg
-
- Posts: 3732
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
I addressed those people in my comment already. They are the ones who fall for the propaganda spewed by their political leaders and lobbyists, the ones who do stand to gain financially.plaamook wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019Nah, I think you're reading it wrong.PhillipOrdonez wrote: ↑26 Apr 2019
Because one side looks at the data and worries about the future. The other only cares about money, so they spew propaganda undermining the facts and making it a partisan thing, It is not their problem now, it is the problem of people in the future, they'll be fine cause they get the big lobby paychecks and their followers eat the whole charade up and decide to believe evil greedy liars over facts.
There's a reason there are experts who study shit like this all the time and they all agree based on evidence that climate is changing and we are causing it since the industrial Revolution and there's a point of no return ahead. There's no arguing against facts. Only lies and corruption and ego. And that is ALL coming from one side alone.
The people that question the human climate model are not all oil tycoons. There are lots of people that just take different perspectives on the matter that don't stand to gain financially from doing so. Ordinary people if you will. There's a different axis there I think.
- Creativemind
- Posts: 4875
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Stoke-On-Trent, England, UK
What he says at 14m27 though, about using ethanol to run your car, in the UK, does anyone know where you buy it and how much it costs in comparison with petrol?
Last edited by Creativemind on 26 Apr 2019, edited 1 time in total.
Reason Studio's 11.3 / Cockos Reaper 6.82 / Cakewalk By Bandlab / Orion 8.6
http://soundcloud.com/creativemind75/iv ... soul-mix-3
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests