As jam-s suggested I was running with CPU limit at none. Setting it 95% made a difference. I will try running out to the Tascam when I get a chance and see if that changes anything.Przemyslaw wrote: ↑05 Mar 2019
Many thanks for the description. It's very interesting that you went through the whole reason test complex. I have i7 7820x, after OC 19990 points in the passmark and I reach 56 seconds in this complex test. The remaining specification is comparable to yours. With the fact that it's great if you carried out the test on Tascam US2x2 drivers (preferably with 1024samples latency in Reason audio preferences). The control surface is unlikely to affect the test.
You have a very strong single core processor, I wonder if this determines such a huge performance. Your 3038 to 2489 in my single thread processor. That's 20% more.
Reason 9.5 & above CPU Stress Tests (2017, two different songfiles included)!
The 9700k doesn't run HT, just 8 straight cores. It is a slightly slower 9900k with HT turned off and less L3 cache. I picked it because it was about 150 cheaper than the 9900k at the time and I feel slightly less vulnerable to side channel attacks. Probably just a pipe dream and I probably should have sucked it up and picked the 9900.EnochLight wrote: ↑05 Mar 2019Of course you do - under Reason’s Preferences. And there should be an option under your motherboard BIOS if you want to turn it off for Windows (which I don’t recommend).
- EnochLight
- Moderator
- Posts: 8411
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Imladris
viewtopic.php?p=434834#p434834
Meh, that 9900 isn't really that much faster - single thread is almost identical to the 9700k. I'm sure you're fine.
Win 10 | Ableton Live 11 Suite | Reason 12 | i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | RME Babyface Pro | Akai MPC Live 2 & Akai Force | Roland System 8, MX1, TB3 | Dreadbox Typhon | Korg Minilogue XD
It feels almost like buying a new 4x4 F250 and not getting the offroad package. Sorta. But maybe not.EnochLight wrote: ↑06 Mar 2019viewtopic.php?p=434834#p434834
Meh, that 9900 isn't really that much faster - single thread is almost identical to the 9700k. I'm sure you're fine.
- EnochLight
- Moderator
- Posts: 8411
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Imladris
Lol! Yeah, that's a great comparison.
Win 10 | Ableton Live 11 Suite | Reason 12 | i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | RME Babyface Pro | Akai MPC Live 2 & Akai Force | Roland System 8, MX1, TB3 | Dreadbox Typhon | Korg Minilogue XD
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 11 Oct 2017
Yes, I would like a copy of the files. Can you upload them to a file service and DM me the link?splangie wrote: ↑04 Mar 2019If you need a copy of those files let me know.LiberalTugboat wrote: ↑01 Mar 2019Does anyone still have this file? The links on the first page no longer work.
Try this -LiberalTugboat wrote: ↑06 Mar 2019Yes, I would like a copy of the files. Can you upload them to a file service and DM me the link?
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ ... Cx5j6B_ApQ
splangie wrote: ↑07 Mar 2019Try this -LiberalTugboat wrote: ↑06 Mar 2019
Yes, I would like a copy of the files. Can you upload them to a file service and DM me the link?
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ ... Cx5j6B_ApQ
Hi all!
I've updated the links on the main post and now they should work!
I moved my online storage and did not realize I messed up, sorry
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 11 Oct 2017
Front page downloads work now. Thanks everyone! I will let you know how my computer does.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 11 Oct 2017
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (stock speeds, Using Ryzen Balanced power setting)
RAM: 16GB DDR4 3200
Sound Card: Blue Yeti microphone (using ASIO4all @ 44.1 kHz and 512 Buffer)
When playback stops / Computer too slow warning appears COMPLEX RE ----> 4.4.2.49 (7 sec)
When playback stops / Computer too slow warning appears Simple FX Chain ----> 35.1.2.86 (1 min 8 sec)
RAM: 16GB DDR4 3200
Sound Card: Blue Yeti microphone (using ASIO4all @ 44.1 kHz and 512 Buffer)
When playback stops / Computer too slow warning appears COMPLEX RE ----> 4.4.2.49 (7 sec)
When playback stops / Computer too slow warning appears Simple FX Chain ----> 35.1.2.86 (1 min 8 sec)
"And as a nice bonus, it improves performance if you're not using VSTs too! Read on for the details..." https://www.propellerheads.com/blog/rea ... ow-in-beta
Can someone with access to the BETA 10.3 test before and after with the complex file to see the performance difference?
Can someone with access to the BETA 10.3 test before and after with the complex file to see the performance difference?
- Carly(Poohbear)
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: 25 Jan 2015
- Location: UK
It's my understanding that the first round of beta testing is going to be with logging on, so one should wait until logging has been turned off before running the benchmark.Kategra wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019"And as a nice bonus, it improves performance if you're not using VSTs too! Read on for the details..." https://www.propellerheads.com/blog/rea ... ow-in-beta
Can someone with access to the BETA 10.3 test before and after with the complex file to see the performance difference?
- Carly(Poohbear)
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: 25 Jan 2015
- Location: UK
OLD
Test settings 44.1Khz buffer 1024 samples
Note you can't set the CPU limit anymore as that option has been removed.
Complex HT OFF All the way through, 3 Bars Just.
Complex With HT All the way through, 3 Bars Solid.
Simple HT OFF, @2:00 hit 6 bars, 2:15 first clicks and pops.
Simple with HT, @1:14 hit 6 bars, 1:20 first clicks and pops.
With the option "Render Audio using the Audio Card buffer size" turned off
Complex HT OFF All the way through, 5 Bars solid.
Complex With HT All the way through, 4 Bars Solid.
Reason 10.2
Test settings 44.1Khz buffer 1024 samples CPU limit set to none.
Complex HT OFF All the way through, 6 Bars @1:18, NO clicks or pops.
Complex With HT All the way through, just hiting the 6 Bars (no clicks or pops) 5 seconds before the end.
Simple HT OFF, @1:50 hit 6 bars, 1:58 first clicks and pops.
Simple with HT, @1:10 hit 6 bars, 1:16 first clicks and pops.
Note the original (old) test would have been Reason 10.0 (maybe 10.1)
Regards
PoohBear
Reason 10.3Carly(Poohbear) wrote: ↑09 Nov 2018i97940@4Ghz (base speed 3.1GHz)
Test settings 44.1Khz buffer 1024 samples and cpu 95%
Complex HT OFF 1:21
Complex With HT all the way through.
Simple HT OFF 2:00
Simple with HT 1:14
Test settings 44.1Khz buffer 1024 samples
Note you can't set the CPU limit anymore as that option has been removed.
Complex HT OFF All the way through, 3 Bars Just.
Complex With HT All the way through, 3 Bars Solid.
Simple HT OFF, @2:00 hit 6 bars, 2:15 first clicks and pops.
Simple with HT, @1:14 hit 6 bars, 1:20 first clicks and pops.
With the option "Render Audio using the Audio Card buffer size" turned off
Complex HT OFF All the way through, 5 Bars solid.
Complex With HT All the way through, 4 Bars Solid.
Reason 10.2
Test settings 44.1Khz buffer 1024 samples CPU limit set to none.
Complex HT OFF All the way through, 6 Bars @1:18, NO clicks or pops.
Complex With HT All the way through, just hiting the 6 Bars (no clicks or pops) 5 seconds before the end.
Simple HT OFF, @1:50 hit 6 bars, 1:58 first clicks and pops.
Simple with HT, @1:10 hit 6 bars, 1:16 first clicks and pops.
Note the original (old) test would have been Reason 10.0 (maybe 10.1)
Regards
PoohBear
Thank you for testing and posting your results!Carly(Poohbear) wrote: ↑04 Apr 2019OLDReason 10.3Carly(Poohbear) wrote: ↑09 Nov 2018i97940@4Ghz (base speed 3.1GHz)
Test settings 44.1Khz buffer 1024 samples and cpu 95%
Complex HT OFF 1:21
Complex With HT all the way through.
Simple HT OFF 2:00
Simple with HT 1:14
Test settings 44.1Khz buffer 1024 samples
Note you can't set the CPU limit anymore as that option has been removed.
Complex HT OFF All the way through, 3 Bars Just.
Complex With HT All the way through, 3 Bars Solid.
Simple HT OFF, @2:00 hit 6 bars, 2:15 first clicks and pops.
Simple with HT, @1:14 hit 6 bars, 1:20 first clicks and pops.
With the option "Render Audio using the Audio Card buffer size" turned off
Complex HT OFF All the way through, 5 Bars solid.
Complex With HT All the way through, 4 Bars Solid.
Reason 10.2
Test settings 44.1Khz buffer 1024 samples CPU limit set to none.
Complex HT OFF All the way through, 6 Bars @1:18, NO clicks or pops.
Complex With HT All the way through, just hiting the 6 Bars (no clicks or pops) 5 seconds before the end.
Simple HT OFF, @1:50 hit 6 bars, 1:58 first clicks and pops.
Simple with HT, @1:10 hit 6 bars, 1:16 first clicks and pops.
Note the original (old) test would have been Reason 10.0 (maybe 10.1)
Regards
PoohBear
So performance really improved for RE, not just VSTs! That's so wonderful! Hats of to Propellerhead team!
I just had a nice surprise... This file didn't run with R10.2 and with 10.3 it runs until 57 secs without crackling!
Reason 10.3 Buffer 1024, Intel I7 4790k
With the option "Render Audio using the Audio Card buffer size" turned off
Complex HT OFF plays up to 35 secs
Complex With HT ON plays up to 57 secs
I'm going to say again! This thing barely played one in 10.2 no matter what settings.
Cheers,
MC
Reason 10.3 Buffer 1024, Intel I7 4790k
With the option "Render Audio using the Audio Card buffer size" turned off
Complex HT OFF plays up to 35 secs
Complex With HT ON plays up to 57 secs
I'm going to say again! This thing barely played one in 10.2 no matter what settings.
Cheers,
MC
i9 -9900K 3.6 ghz, / max 5 ghz
16 gb
MOTU 828 MK3
44100 Hz 1024 samples
m.2 ssd ADATA 1tb
Both simple and complex go all the way, completely smooth.
At complex my CPU was at 80%@ 4,6 GHZ (but i have multiple VirtualMachines running on this machine).
CPU limit seems to be missing in reason 10.3.
On my macbook pro 13 i7 no touch the song stops at < 1 sec
16 gb
MOTU 828 MK3
44100 Hz 1024 samples
m.2 ssd ADATA 1tb
Both simple and complex go all the way, completely smooth.
At complex my CPU was at 80%@ 4,6 GHZ (but i have multiple VirtualMachines running on this machine).
CPU limit seems to be missing in reason 10.3.
On my macbook pro 13 i7 no touch the song stops at < 1 sec
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 1851
- Joined: 14 Sep 2015
- Location: Paris, France
What did you mean by "non-logging"?WongoTheSane wrote: ↑29 May 2017My 1.5 seconds was with 9.5 (latest non-logging, haven't updated yet), with 9.2 I get to 4 seconds. Weird, there shouldn't be any difference...Loque wrote:Anyone compared performance between 9.2 and 9.5?
Non-logging refers to a Reason beta version without performance consuming event logging. Initial beta versions are quite slow due to this, eventually during beta testing they turn off logging.etyrnal2 wrote: ↑17 Sep 2019What did you mean by "non-logging"?WongoTheSane wrote: ↑29 May 2017
My 1.5 seconds was with 9.5 (latest non-logging, haven't updated yet), with 9.2 I get to 4 seconds. Weird, there shouldn't be any difference...
Hi thanks for the input - As I've learned to build a machine and over clock as well (OC)__3700 K is one of the CPU's I've got and have OC'ed it - Not a crazy OC but the highest possible clock for the lowest possible temperatures by finding the lowest v_core.EnochLight wrote: ↑30 Jul 2018Yes, Reason will “see” all cores/threads. Your performance will vary, as demonstrated in various builds in this thread. I’d suggest experimenting with Reason’s Hyperthreading settings once you get your new machine.
CPU’s with high single thread performance ratings tend to do well with Reason in its current form. Be aware that Propellerhead have publicly stated they are working on performance and plan a free update later this year that may help, though.
On an aside, here's how the 7980XE compares to my 6+ year old quad core 3770k. While its overall CPU Mark (which takes into consideration multiple threads/cores) is almost 3x faster than my old chip, its single thread rating is a mere 11%-12% faster.
extreme.JPG
I managed 4.4 Ghz all cores (as far as I know)__with a Passmark rating of 11,300 points and single threaded performance increase as well by a n equal margin but I forget the exact number
- EnochLight
- Moderator
- Posts: 8411
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Imladris
Lol - yeah, that was over a year ago.
Sounds nice. How is your performance in Reason? What version of Reason are you on?fraz wrote: ↑02 Oct 2019As I've learned to build a machine and over clock as well (OC)__3700 K is one of the CPU's I've got and have OC'ed it - Not a crazy OC but the highest possible clock for the lowest possible temperatures by finding the lowest v_core.
I managed 4.4 Ghz all cores (as far as I know)__with a Passmark rating of 11,300 points and single threaded performance increase as well by a n equal margin but I forget the exact number
Win 10 | Ableton Live 11 Suite | Reason 12 | i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | RME Babyface Pro | Akai MPC Live 2 & Akai Force | Roland System 8, MX1, TB3 | Dreadbox Typhon | Korg Minilogue XD
- Grumbleweed
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 214
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
What a difference a couple of years make! My Ryzen 9 3900X just played through the complex track with no problem and played through (with crackles) the simple track to the end.Kategra wrote: ↑30 May 2017Can you disable your LAN adapter after opening the song, also change the Latency to max (should be 1024 for RME Babyface) and then retest?EnochLight wrote:This song file won't play back at all on my system without immediately pop/crack/distort for half a second and then too slow. I'm not sure which tracks to start deleting to get to a point where it will start playing back in some semblance of normalcy, though I gather that that's not the point of this song file.
- Intel i7 3770k @ 4.2 Ghz
- 16 GB of RAM
- RME Babyface Pro
- 44.1 Hz @ 256 samples as well as 512 samples
- CPU limit set to 95%
- Windows 10 Pro
Anyway, I don't expect i7 3770 play more than 4 seconds.
I'm really curious of how much the 8+ cores i7s and Xeons would play.. I don't have much hope for Ryzen though.
Sweet
Grum.
Reason 12, Cubase 12
http://www.soundclick.com/grumbleweed
http://www.soundcloud.com/grumbleweed
YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOCKfzovfT4
http://www.soundclick.com/grumbleweed
http://www.soundcloud.com/grumbleweed
YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOCKfzovfT4
It's true. I clearly remember not being able to run the Complex Benchmark song at all a few years ago; The audio engine would just die the moment I hit play. Now I can play through the entire song with power to spare. A pretty wild reality check for just how far we've come.Grumbleweed wrote: ↑16 Feb 2020What a difference a couple of years make! My Ryzen 9 3900X just played through the complex track with no problem and played through (with crackles) the simple track to the end.Kategra wrote: ↑30 May 2017
Can you disable your LAN adapter after opening the song, also change the Latency to max (should be 1024 for RME Babyface) and then retest?
Anyway, I don't expect i7 3770 play more than 4 seconds.
I'm really curious of how much the 8+ cores i7s and Xeons would play.. I don't have much hope for Ryzen though.
Sweet
Grum.
Music is nothing else but wild sounds civilized into time and tune.
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Yandex [Bot] and 9 guests