"Only reason made" statement...

[Marc64]

What do you think is "Reason made" when posting a song. Is it when you have done a track in reason with only the native reason devices or with vsts and all?
I think it sounds wierd to say "done only in reason" when you now can use vsts like all other daws.
Its like when using cubase and say "done only in cubase" . Does anyone say that btw?
Let the rant start

Skickat från min SM-G935F via Tapatalk

[jam-s]

I thin the wording is important here: "only made in Reason" vs. "made in Reason only".

[aeox]

What do you think is "Reason made" when posting a song. Is it when you have done a track in reason with only the native reason devices or with vsts and all?
I think it sounds wierd to say "done only in reason" when you now can use vsts like all other daws.
Its like when using cubase and say "done only in cubase" . Does anyone say that btw?
Let the rant start

Skickat från min SM-G935F via Tapatalk

It is weird but I think it's to let people know the struggle their CPU went through to achieve the results.

[Marc64]

I thin the wording is important here: "only made in Reason" vs. "made in Reason only".

well yeah but you know what I mean

Skickat från min SM-G935F via Tapatalk

[gullum]

to me, it means I only used Reason to make the song, with or without VST. in any other daw, you can use VST or only native devices, just as you can in Reason

[esselfortium]

It's a holdover from the old days when producing music in Reason alone (i.e. without rewiring into another DAW) meant working only with the built-in instruments and effects. Even back then, you could sample basically anything you wanted into Reason's samplers and drum machines, but the distinction has had less and less actual meaning over the years since audio recording, rack extensions, and VST were added.

[etyrnal]

What do you think is "Reason made" when posting a song. Is it when you have done a track in reason with only the native reason devices or with vsts and all?
I think it sounds wierd to say "done only in reason" when you now can use vsts like all other daws.
Its like when using cubase and say "done only in cubase" . Does anyone say that btw?
Let the rant start

Skickat från min SM-G935F via Tapatalk

What does it matter? You either like the music or you don't. And when it comes to music production the end kind of justifies the means.

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

[Zac]

I think the insinuated pride is gone since Reason got REs and VSts. It used to be hey i got this out of a limited device set. There are very few limitations now. (Vst midi pls)

IMO it means nothing any more.

[Zac]

That said, I'm still impressed when people produce amazing tracks from just one synth.

[tibah]

It's a holdover from the old days when producing music in Reason alone (i.e. without rewiring into another DAW) meant working only with the built-in instruments and effects. Even back then, you could sample basically anything you wanted into Reason's samplers and drum machines, but the distinction has had less and less actual meaning over the years since audio recording, rack extensions, and VST were added.

This.

Over the past years I realized that I also don't want to label myself as a "Reason user" anymore, which used to be a thing created by that area.

[motuscott]

[/quote]
It is weird but I think it's to let people know the struggle their CPU went through to achieve the results.
[/quote]
and then there's "that sound"

[Zac]

It is weird but I think it's to let people know the struggle their CPU went through to achieve the results.
[/quote]
and then there's "that sound"


[/quote]

Hic... it's like 7am in nue yerk... youve got a hell uva lot uv catchin up to do