selig wrote:Ahhhhh, I think I know what's going on here…mreese80 wrote:Reason does not as loud or as bright. And i'm talking about before eq's. Maybe to your ears they sound the same, but they don't to me. Same with fl studio. Here's the reason i don't use it. Vst's sound fine. but when i load up drum samples they dont. they sound thin and light. I can't prove you wrong if that's what you hear. But i know how i've heard reason for years. It doesn't sound the same. I don't have a problem with it now. I know how to get my sound. It's not even hard. I just was never mixing right. Another thing is unless you've used reason all your life you would probably never notice a sound difference. The vst market is big. Tons of plugins. Not being able to use these in reason has been the issue of most. But i have a work around for vsts so i dont care no more. Reason is the real deal imo so you have to know how to mix.selig wrote:Well…mreese80 wrote:What it comes down to is knowing how to mix in reason. I thought the same thing for years until recently. It is true that every other daw (everyone i've used) is louder out the gate compared to reason. The thing about other daws that i don't like is they have a brighter, crispier sound. Things are easier in other daws than in reason. But i like reason because it's like having real hardware. It doesn't do everything for you like most daws. It required me researching a lot. And that helped me. I learned things i never knew. I had been mixing wrong for years. Not only do i get a better sound now in reason but i get a better sound in my other daws now. It wasn't reason that was the problem, it was more.
The thing I like about all DAWs is they are exactly the same loudness and none or brighter/darker than the others. Makes moving between them very easy in my experience. There's absolutely no logical reason for them to be any different from each other. Never seen any evidence to the contrary.
If they were not, then it would be obvious and everyone would agree they were different (and the measurements would bear this out as well).
I'm always willing to stand corrected if proven wrong, but so far I've not see any evidence to support any core differences in level or spectral balances.
Once you start adding EQ/Dynamics etc. there are PLENTY of differences - but that's not what we're talking about, right?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I'm talking about REASON. You seem to be talking about DEVICES/PLUGINS in Reason. Two TOTALLY different things.
I'm willing to bet that "sound" you hear is simply the fact that some Reason devices wisely (and correctly) leave some headroom, so a sample loaded in say, ReDrum, will not and should not be as loud as that sample loaded as audio on an audio track.
Remember, "louder" always sounds better to the human ear. That means it sounds not just louder, but BETTER. The opposite is also true - softer sounds thinner and lighter, exactly as you describe, not just softer.
Leaving headroom is important because if you have two samples at full volume and play them together, you'll instantly clip the outputs. Leaving headroom is important to prevent this form happening, and that's why Reason devices do this.
You are not the first person to say Reason sounds "thin" exactly because of the headroom used for the samplers. You can easily prove this is not a problem to yourself by lowering the level of samples in your VSTs, or by raising the level of the samples in Reason. You'll find other than level, they are EXACTLY the same. This subject comes up again and again and you may even be able to find other threads on the same subject if you dig around a little. And once you understand why this is being done, you'll probably appreciate why it's the way it is.
Reason sounds different. I know it does. I'm not the only person who thinks this. It's been said for years. It's not a bad thing, It's not about headroom Selig lol.