mataya wrote:
"Thin" is also "bright", and "fat" is often simply "dark". It's all relative and a matter of taste (and depends on what you're looking for). I often prefer a thin sound for some instruments, fwiw.
I couldn't get the same result by just filtering and equing the saw in reason synts. Logic tells me I should of been able, but "I" couldn't.
But more important to me is the questions...why does the Bazzile saw sound different(better to me), then all the saw's I tried in reason?
We're not talking about patches/presets sounding better, but just the single saw waveform.
I understand that sometimes you want a thin sound, but don't you want a single digital waveform sounding closer to the real world analogue oscillator, like I'm hearing in a modular type modules? Bazzile sounds closer to that. What could be the reason, reason not being able to produce a similar or even better sounding waveform.
Just demoed softube's modular, and again none of reason synths come even close to that single oscillator.
I really don't want to go "reason sound bad" road again, but I just don't understand why is this the case...a simple saw in all reason synths compared to some newer vst's...sounds worse, weak?
tx
M[/quote]
Remember that even in the analog world there were "thin" and "fat" sounding modules, both oscillators and filters - choosing only one to call "analog" belies the reality of the situation IMO.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk