There is absolutely no way on earth you need that many devices, cables and complexity to test the original hypothesis, which was "the mixer adds color". If that's the hypothesis you want to check, you only have to compare the signals with and without the mixer, that's it. What you have actually proven here is this: if you keep chaining, in the most convoluted way, devices which you assume shouldn't introduce color, you're bound to find one that does in the end. But how does this prove that the mixer adds color???8cros wrote:I've updated the link
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0By9ym ... HlDQUFRR3c
You have 31 devices in that chain (not counting the TMAs), that's 29 more than is necessary!! You need a wav file, a mixer, and nothing else. Measure the output of the mixer against the same output without the mixer. End of! Now there are myriads of ways to compare them (Selig measures the output directly because he has the knowledge, I use a quick visual hack because I don't, coders will write a program to brute-compare, engineers will bench it with an external program...) but yours is simply wrong. 31 devices!! You're detecting the color from your measurements, not from the mixer... Yes, one of those devices adds color, but it's not the mixer, that's for sure.