Manual Mastering vs. LANDR Automated Mastering

Want to talk about music hardware or software that doesn't include Reason?
Post Reply
User avatar
pjeudy
Posts: 1559
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

06 Feb 2016

Take a listen and read at this:
https://ask.audio/articles/producer-cha ... -mastering
My opinion is that Propellerhead REASON needs a complete rewrite!
P.S: people should stop saying "No it won't happen" when referring to a complete rewrite of REASON. I have 3 letters for ya....VST
Mon Dec 11, 2017 1:53 pm
Top
User avatar
The_G
Posts: 558
Joined: 17 Jan 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:
Contact The_G

06 Feb 2016

That's really interesting. Seems like a good alternative to doing rough masters yourself using a DAW--especially if you are the type who just uses preset settings and doesn't know the ins and outs of mastering manually. But even though you get 2 low-res .MP3s free, after that it isn't all that cheap.

What I'd be interested to know, then, is how it stacks up to some of the inexpensive manual mastering options available online, like this one: http://www.headroommastering.com/?gclid ... gQod15cOrQ

The price there is $10/song for an uncompressed .WAV (same as with LANDR).
Cosmopolis, out now: : https://timeslaves.bandcamp.com/album/cosmopolis! Check out the first single, "City Lights:
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Hardware and Other Software”

  • Information

  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: Trendiction [Bot] and 6 guests