Why an RE maximizer/limiter over the M-Class?

This forum is for discussing Rack Extensions. Devs are all welcome to show off their goods.
Post Reply
BillyKodak
Posts: 21
Joined: 19 Jan 2015

05 Apr 2015

I've been getting some very good results with Reason's stock maximizer/limiter. What do any of the REs offer that the M-Class doesn't? Cheers, Kodak.

User avatar
DiZo
Posts: 122
Joined: 20 Jan 2015

05 Apr 2015

more control with ozone

User avatar
Benedict
Competition Winner
Posts: 2747
Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Contact:

05 Apr 2015

Hi

M-Class is a good workhorse for sure. I have lately been using Onyx, which while less forgiving has a nice way of coloring the sound - the "tube" thing to some extent I think.

:)
Benedict Roff-Marsh
Completely burned and gone

User avatar
Ocean of Waves
Posts: 231
Joined: 16 Jan 2015

06 Apr 2015

I never use limiters on a channel, I simply don't know why I should use them there. In the end of the mastering chain, sure, I'll use one there..

User avatar
Last Alternative
Posts: 1343
Joined: 20 Jan 2015
Location: the lost desert

06 Apr 2015

Unless you're talking about mastering, I have read about limiting bass. Vocals too.
https://lastalternative.bandcamp.com
:reason: 12.7.4 | MacBook Pro (16”, 2021), OS Sonoma, M1 Max, 4TB SSD, 64GB RAM | quality instruments & gear

User avatar
mcatalao
Competition Winner
Posts: 1827
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

06 Apr 2015

Ozone has a lot more control, has 4 different modes for limiting algorithms, 6 positions for stereo linking, security margin, speed control, and a dither/finalizing section with a lot of settings.



michael.jaye
Posts: 302
Joined: 18 Jan 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

06 Apr 2015

I cannot give a scientific, detailed answer with specifics, but sometimes when I can't get Ozone to 'pump' nicely enough I'll try the M-Class and it fills the void. 

User avatar
Bonkhead
Posts: 335
Joined: 18 Jan 2015

08 Apr 2015

Sound. I like onyx the best. Even over ozone.

MDTerps2015
Posts: 416
Joined: 25 Jan 2015

08 Apr 2015

Bonkhead wrote:Sound. I like onyx the best. Even over ozone.
You know they had a big debate over this in Reasontalk about that very comparison. I like Onyx better too because i trialled them both at the same time and for some reason I couldnt hear the squishy-ness or distorting some were talking about. I think Onyx has a warmth to it too. 
150 paid RExtensions and still no Grammy

User avatar
ProfessaKaos
Posts: 482
Joined: 17 Jan 2015
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

09 Apr 2015

Onyx (Tube) into Ozone (IRC II) for just a touch of limiting at each stage, good times.
Reason 12 & 11.3 Suite PC- Windows 10, AMD Ryzen 9 5900x, Asus ROG CROSSHAIR Dark Hero VIII, 64GB G.Skill 3600C16 RAM, 980 Pro Samsung M.2, RTX3060.

https://soundcloud.com/juo-jual
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwNLcE ... DjhSI16TqQ

User avatar
Karim
Competition Winner
Posts: 957
Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Location: Italy
Contact:

09 Apr 2015

To me The onyx limiter rack extension is far far better than ozone and mc class
Karim Le Mec : Dj/Producer/Label Owner ( :reason: 11.3+ R12  IMac 2016 21")
FOLLOW Karim Le Mec
https://www.youtube.com/user/lemecdj
https://karimlemec.weebly.com/
https://soundcloud.com/karimlemec
https://t.me/reasonstudiosworld

User avatar
Karim
Competition Winner
Posts: 957
Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Location: Italy
Contact:

09 Apr 2015

+100000
Bonkhead wrote:Sound. I like onyx the best. Even over ozone.
Karim Le Mec : Dj/Producer/Label Owner ( :reason: 11.3+ R12  IMac 2016 21")
FOLLOW Karim Le Mec
https://www.youtube.com/user/lemecdj
https://karimlemec.weebly.com/
https://soundcloud.com/karimlemec
https://t.me/reasonstudiosworld

User avatar
doctecazoid
Posts: 69
Joined: 23 Jan 2015
Contact:

09 Apr 2015

While compressor/limiter devices in Reason all do the same thing to a greater or lesser extent, the algorithms and math that each one uses to achieve the effect are not the same from device to device.  It's a classic case of 'there is more than one way to do it.'  As such, each compressor colors the sound in its own unique way.

Once you, as an engineer/sound person, develop the necessary aural/analytical skills necessary to identify the differences between the way each compressor/limiter alters the sound, you can more accurately assess and determine which device to use in a given situation.

I do agree with others in this thread regarding the Onyx.  To my ears, while the M-Class does a reasonably good job of compressing a signal, I find at times that its overall sound character is kind of brittle to my ears.  With the Onyx, the tube setting imparts a smoothness to the signal that I find very appealing.  One caveat however: it's easy to mis-use the Onyx, and it will introduce distortion into the signal if the settings are even just a tad too aggressive.  When this happens, adjust the compression amount and the input/output signal volumes downward and really use your ears to focus on the changes - get the balance right!


Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: steff3 and 16 guests