it's an original song about drugs in a standard blues. :t0305:
drogenblues (drugs blues)
Forum rules
Remember to begin your thread subject with a genre, ie.: (Hiphop) New instrumental
Remember to begin your thread subject with a genre, ie.: (Hiphop) New instrumental
-
- Posts: 725
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Cologne, Germany
Our take in reason of our last band rehearsal
it's an original song about drugs in a standard blues. :t0305:
it's an original song about drugs in a standard blues. :t0305:
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: 24 Jan 2015
1:14 Beer... Essential part of every studio. :s0826:
-
- Posts: 976
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: So. Illinois, USA
Unfortunately I don't speak your language, but the performance was cool. Looks like you guys could do a cool live set. Do you ever play like that?
My most recent: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=7504378
-
- Posts: 725
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Cologne, Germany
Unfortunately I don't speak your language, but the performance was cool. Looks like you guys could do a cool live set. Do you ever play like that?
Thanks. Yes, it's our live Set. Acoustic Guitar, Bass, Cajon and Vocals. We decided not to use a Drum-Set, because it's handier for the tranport and because there are too many pop bands with standard drums.![]()
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Very Good, But i enjoyed this Track More.....http://youtu.be/vs1M8geVQNY
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 2775
- Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Wee Joe wrote:Very Good, But i enjoyed this Track More.....http://youtu.be/vs1M8geVQNY
Agreed. Up to the guitar solo... That one doesn't work for me that well...
D.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Wee Joe wrote:Very Good, But i enjoyed this Track More.....http://youtu.be/vs1M8geVQNY
+1 Yeah, the Guitar solo could have been better.eusti wrote:
Agreed. Up to the guitar solo... That one doesn't work for me that well...
D.
-
- Posts: 725
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Cologne, Germany
Yep, the guitarsolo was not so good. agreed. but i made an electro remix of this song and used the whole part of the solo as a basic element with reverse reverb and alligator and that was the strange result:
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Nicely done. I understand the theme is about drugs, Amsterdam and prohibition. And that is right down my alley
But why are you guys smoking (tobacco i guess?) indoor? It brakes my heart. I can feel the agony from the gear, furniture and instruments..trying to breathe in the hostile environment, like a human on the surface of Neptune.. :bawl:
If it's your studio I guess you can do whatever you want, so I'll shut up now

If it's your studio I guess you can do whatever you want, so I'll shut up now

-
- Posts: 725
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Cologne, Germany
It is our Studio. I know about the consequences of nicotine for our equipment, but the consequences for our lungs are more harmful and we still smoke. stupid and typical addictive behavior i guess.Wensell wrote:Nicely done. I understand the theme is about drugs, Amsterdam and prohibition. And that is right down my alleyBut why are you guys smoking (tobacco i guess?) indoor? It brakes my heart. I can feel the agony from the gear, furniture and instruments..trying to breathe in the hostile environment, like a human on the surface of Neptune.. :bawl:
If it's your studio I guess you can do whatever you want, so I'll shut up now![]()
-
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
?? What exactly would cigarette residue do to the gear in your opinion? I always have to chuckle a bit when people sell stuff on eBay as "coming from a non smoker studio". "So is your studio antiseptic as well? Do you keep dust out by having overpressure?"Wensell wrote:Nicely done. I understand the theme is about drugs, Amsterdam and prohibition. And that is right down my alleyBut why are you guys smoking (tobacco i guess?) indoor? It brakes my heart. I can feel the agony from the gear, furniture and instruments..trying to breathe in the hostile environment, like a human on the surface of Neptune.. :bawl:
If it's your studio I guess you can do whatever you want, so I'll shut up now![]()
-
- Posts: 725
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Cologne, Germany
Wensell wrote:Nicely done. I understand the theme is about drugs, Amsterdam and prohibition. And that is right down my alleyBut why are you guys smoking (tobacco i guess?) indoor? It brakes my heart. I can feel the agony from the gear, furniture and instruments..trying to breathe in the hostile environment, like a human on the surface of Neptune.. :bawl:
If it's your studio I guess you can do whatever you want, so I'll shut up now![]()
Nicotine is a very aggressive substance and deposits on the membranes of the microphone.normen wrote:
?? What exactly would cigarette residue do to the gear in your opinion? I always have to chuckle a bit when people sell stuff on eBay as "coming from a non smoker studio". "So is your studio antiseptic as well? Do you keep dust out by having overpressure?"
-
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Aggressive in what respect? Nicotine can't destroy metal (condenser mics) or plastic/cellulose (dynamic mics). Human saliva is much more dangerous in that respect.Noplan wrote:Nicotine is a very aggressive substance and deposits on the membranes of the microphone mebranes.
-
- Posts: 725
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Cologne, Germany
Noplan wrote:Nicotine is a very aggressive substance and deposits on the membranes of the microphone mebranes.
Agressive was maybe the wrong term, but the smoke transports the nicotine in every corner of your Equipment and affects the physical function of the membranes. It is very hard to remove the nicotine film. It's not comparable with dust. The particels are smaller and the substance is stickier.normen wrote:
Aggressive in what respect? Nicotine can't destroy metal (condenser mics) or plastic/cellulose (dynamic mics). Human saliva is much more dangerous in that respect.
-
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Yeah, thats about the only area where it somewhat applies, not really for condenser mics though and negligibly so for dynamic mics. Imagine how thick the layer would have to be to get into the range of the weight of the actual membrane.. 100$ for anyone being able to tell the difference of a smoker studio mic vs a non smoker micNoplan wrote:Agressive was maybe the wrong term, but the smoke transports the nicotine in every corner of your Equipment and affects the physical function of the membranes. It is very hard to remove the nicotine film. It's not comparable with dust. The particels are smaller and the substance is stickier.

That said, smoking is bad for you, and a non smoker studio generally smells much better, I am not defending smoking in the studio in any way, I just don't like myths

-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Haha, what if the smoker mic sounds ubercool, because the ultrathin layer of nicotine, in conjuction with saliva enhance the microfon.. I guess it somehow would mute the harsh mids..normen wrote:.. 100$ for anyone being able to tell the difference of a smoker studio mic vs a non smoker mic![]()


-
- Moderator
- Posts: 2775
- Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Noplan wrote:Agressive was maybe the wrong term, but the smoke transports the nicotine in every corner of your Equipment and affects the physical function of the membranes. It is very hard to remove the nicotine film. It's not comparable with dust. The particels are smaller and the substance is stickier.
I can most likely tell a smoker mic from a non smoker mic... Even with closed eyes!normen wrote:
Yeah, thats about the only area where it somewhat applies, not really for condenser mics though and negligibly so for dynamic mics. Imagine how thick the layer would have to be to get into the range of the weight of the actual membrane.. 100$ for anyone being able to tell the difference of a smoker studio mic vs a non smoker mic![]()
That said, smoking is bad for you, and a non smoker studio generally smells much better, I am not defending smoking in the studio in any way, I just don't like myths![]()
The smell should make that quite easy!
Oh, you mean soundwise...

D.
-
- Posts: 725
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Cologne, Germany
Noplan wrote:Agressive was maybe the wrong term, but the smoke transports the nicotine in every corner of your Equipment and affects the physical function of the membranes. It is very hard to remove the nicotine film. It's not comparable with dust. The particels are smaller and the substance is stickier.
finally i'm with you. I think that the effect on the equipment is not relevant but not ideal.normen wrote:
Yeah, thats about the only area where it somewhat applies, not really for condenser mics though and negligibly so for dynamic mics. Imagine how thick the layer would have to be to get into the range of the weight of the actual membrane.. 100$ for anyone being able to tell the difference of a smoker studio mic vs a non smoker mic![]()
That said, smoking is bad for you, and a non smoker studio generally smells much better, I am not defending smoking in the studio in any way, I just don't like myths![]()
-
- Posts: 725
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Cologne, Germany
By the way since the beginning of this year I use only an e-cigarette.
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 2 guests