I screencast it and play the song showing mixer, arrangement and racks ext. used (mentioned in the video description).
Enjoy!
Yes. I jumped here and there ( I don' t usually make this kind of video) to show off the rack and some details but I get. Is really confusing [emoji23]Pete B wrote:Interesting. The video was jumping about a bit too much to follow, especially early on, but I was surprised how many different devices and tracks you used. Overall I enjoyed watching it, which is a bit of a geek confession. Like myself, I think people on here will probably pay more attention to the video than the music, which might not be what you want.
HepCat wrote:Karim, l see you try different styles, have you ever tried tropical house? You're obviously professional grade so it would cool to hear some tropical house on this website.
Hi yes that's a cool tune. I guess i'd just call that batacuda music or samba or house, l don't know but it's quite good, nice work, man.lemec wrote: You can listen to a pluck that reminds to the genre but in this is important the progression notes ( to me is the secret
to do good ones).
https://www.beatport.com/track/hashtag- ... ix/7950044
Thanx. and Yes . I did this summer a Batucada Music Style inspired by Rio Olympionic games.HepCat wrote:Hi yes that's a cool tune. I guess i'd just call that batacuda music or samba or house, l don't know but it's quite good, nice work, man.lemec wrote: You can listen to a pluck that reminds to the genre but in this is important the progression notes ( to me is the secret
to do good ones).
https://www.beatport.com/track/hashtag- ... ix/7950044
I think it's interesting for the video to move from the sequencer to the rack, etc., but it would be easier to follow if you were focussing on a few things rather than trying to show everything. For example, if you choose a part you like and show it evolving in the sequencer, then highlight the same part in the rack, or vice versa, I'm sure people would be interested to see what you're using to make particular sounds. Obviously you'd have to focus on longish or repetitive parts of the music for that to work.lemec wrote: Yes. I jumped here and there ( I don' t usually make this kind of video) to show off the rack and some details but I get. Is really confusing [emoji23]
In your opininon is better to leave the track in the sequencer position to play or what?
Thanx . Is very good suggestion and more focused to the process how rhw song is done. I' ll take care of your suggestion. [emoji6]Pete B wrote:I think it's interesting for the video to move from the sequencer to the rack, etc., but it would be easier to follow if you were focussing on a few things rather than trying to show everything. For example, if you choose a part you like and show it evolving in the sequencer, then highlight the same part in the rack, or vice versa, I'm sure people would be interested to see what you're using to make particular sounds. Obviously you'd have to focus on longish or repetitive parts of the music for that to work.lemec wrote: Yes. I jumped here and there ( I don' t usually make this kind of video) to show off the rack and some details but I get. Is really confusing [emoji23]
In your opininon is better to leave the track in the sequencer position to play or what?
Users browsing this forum: Popey and 3 guests