NI soundbank alternatives: orchestral, r&b, soul

Need some fresh sounds? Want to show off your sound design skills? Here's the place!
User avatar
syncanonymous
Posts: 432
Joined: 16 Mar 2015
Location: UK and France

Post 09 Feb 2021

***EDIT
Many members at Reasontalk bought Softphonics. I originally posted a reply to a thread from 2015 which had 6 pages of other members singing the praises before I got involved. which is here:
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7373569
***end edit

The Softphonics scam was a surprise to me which I just learned of in the last few days.

I don't find any official word about closure on the matter. I was duped too. I need samples going forward: orchestral (strings, winds, perc), old school R&B and Soul (horns). I have Chambre, Embouchre and Epic. Seems the only real option is to delete those and purchase some facsimile of Kontact/ Komplete. That's 400 currency units for basic entry and a lot more to get strings, horns and perc. Those costs aren't a huge issue for me. I certainly don't need any guitar stuff from NI!

Anyone willing to talk about this or is the matter taboo? I learned about Softphonic on Reasontalk, not in the phead shop.

I am happy to be told to not talk about it. I just wonder what others who bought into Softphonics are doing. Is the ethical thing to give NI some (more) business? or just forget it and walk away deleting the Softphonics? I mean, I'm lucky in that I can write the cost off...and I already did for Softphonic purchases. Fact is, I have music to make right now and would like to use samples to produce that music. I'm far too ethical to use any Softphonics stuff going forward and willing to go back to old jobs with legit soundbanks to replace and remove the Softphonics parts.

I wonder where other users stand.
Last edited by syncanonymous on 09 Feb 2021, edited 4 times in total.
RSN 10.4d4_9878_RME UFX+_Intel Core i7-8700K 3.7 GHz__Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR4-3000
ASRock Fatal1ty Z370__Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti KalmX__Samsung 960 PRO/ M.2-2280 NVME SSD
:reason: :re: :recycle: :PUF_figure: :rebirth: :refill:

chaosroyale
Posts: 589
Joined: 05 Sep 2017

Post 09 Feb 2021

there are some sample libraries that work with the free "Kontakt Player", and ANYTHING will sound better than the lazy shovelware that sofphonics put out. Even ignoring the scam part, his libraries did not have proper articulations, round robins, or velocity layers, often included artifacts. Any free Spitfire library will be much better for you, both sonically and ethically.
syncanonymous wrote:
09 Feb 2021
The Softphonics scam was a surprise to me which I just learned of in the last few days.

I don't find any official word about closure on the matter. I was duped too. I need orchestral samples going forward. I have Chambre, Embouchre and Epic. Seems the only real option is to delete those and purchase some facsimile of Kontact/ Komplete. That's 400 currency units for basic entry and a lot more to get strings, horns and perc. I certainly don't need any guitar stuff from NI!

Anyone willing to talk about this or is the matter taboo? I learned about Softphonic on Reasontalk, not in the phead shop.

I am happy to be told to not talk about it. I just wonder what others who bought into Softphonics are doing. Is the ethical thing to give NI some (more) business? or just forget it and walk away deleting the Softphonics? I mean, I'm lucky in that I can write the cost off...and I already did for Softphonic purchases. Fact is, I have music to make right now and would like to use samples to produce that music. I'm far too ethical to use any Softphonics stuff going forward and willing to go back to old jobs with legit soundbanks to replace and remove the Softphonics parts.

I wonder where other users stand.

User avatar
syncanonymous
Posts: 432
Joined: 16 Mar 2015
Location: UK and France

Post 09 Feb 2021

chaosroyale wrote:
09 Feb 2021
there are some sample libraries that work with the free "Kontakt Player", and ANYTHING will sound better than the lazy shovelware that sofphonics put out. Even ignoring the scam part, his libraries did not have proper articulations, round robins, or velocity layers, often included artifacts. Any free Spitfire library will be much better for you, both sonically and ethically.
thanks, I'll have a look...doesn't have to be free :-)
How about suggestions that aren't free? Or is Spitfire the path you took?

chaosroyale
Posts: 589
Joined: 05 Sep 2017

Post 09 Feb 2021

My case is a little weird: the answer would be "I use anything and everything" depending on whether it is personal, or for a corporate client, or on a tight schedule, etc.

For Kontakt, "Strezov Sampling" are generally very good, and a reasonable price for the quality. Or If you don't mind using the "Best Service" sample player, libraries by Eduardo Tarilonte are good for a smaller scale ethnic sound. The Best Service sampler is free when you buy a Library, if I recall correctly.

Honestly - check out Spitfire first, they have a bunch of FREE and GOOD instruments, you can't argue with that combination. I think you will get a lot more from having 3 or 4 really nice instruments that you like, maybe some of them free, than by risking 500 bucks on a single mega-library that you hope can do everything.

EDIT: in case anyone reads this without context - Softphonics libraries were lazy shit and anything from a reputable maker will be better. I feel bad for everyone who bought them.

User avatar
esselfortium
Posts: 1401
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

Post 09 Feb 2021

If you're in the market for orchestral libraries and you're on a budget, be sure to do a bit of searching around for previous sale prices. It's not unusual to see deep discounts on pricey libraries for summer sales, spring sales, Christmas sales, black friday sales, etc.

The most cost-effective option these days is probably the Core edition of Spitfire BBC Symphony Orchestra, which is normally $449 but goes to 40% off during their spring sale (around May I think?) and Christmas sale, and is discounted by an additional $50 if you've got BBC Discover (which you can get for free by filling out a survey), making the price around $220 if I've done my math correctly. That'll get you a complete orchestra recorded comprehensively in a great-sounding space.

If you just need some basic strings, brass, woodwinds, percussion, etc. groups and don't care about having separated instruments, their affordable Spitfire Originals series is also worth checking into.

User avatar
Karim
Posts: 914
Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Location: Italy

Post 09 Feb 2021

Not bad. Sometimes I prefer miroslav.
I alternate them and often use them together in orchestral songs
Yonatan wrote:
16 Apr 2015

https://shop.propellerheads.se/product/chambre/

Any experts on string-libraries? 

I have heard a lot about Miroslav. 

What are your thoughts about this one?
Karim Le Mec : Dj/Producer/Label Owner ( :reason: Vers 11.3  IMac 2016 21")
FOLLOW Karim Le Mec
https://www.youtube.com/user/lemecdj
https://karimlemec.weebly.com/
https://soundcloud.com/karimlemec
https://t.me/reasonstudiosworld

User avatar
Karim
Posts: 914
Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Location: Italy

Post 09 Feb 2021

Karim wrote:
09 Feb 2021
Not bad. Sometimes I prefer miroslav.
I alternate them and often use them together in orchestral songs

(Oh my God. I only realized now that I'm replying to a post from 2015. How did it come to your mind to continue it just now? :D )
Yonatan wrote:
16 Apr 2015

https://shop.propellerheads.se/product/chambre/

Any experts on string-libraries? 

I have heard a lot about Miroslav. 

What are your thoughts about this one?
Karim Le Mec : Dj/Producer/Label Owner ( :reason: Vers 11.3  IMac 2016 21")
FOLLOW Karim Le Mec
https://www.youtube.com/user/lemecdj
https://karimlemec.weebly.com/
https://soundcloud.com/karimlemec
https://t.me/reasonstudiosworld

User avatar
syncanonymous
Posts: 432
Joined: 16 Mar 2015
Location: UK and France

Post 09 Feb 2021

Karim wrote:
09 Feb 2021
Not bad. Sometimes I prefer miroslav.
I alternate them and often use them together in orchestral songs
I do have Miroslav Gold and do use it

the outdated-ness can be effective

User avatar
syncanonymous
Posts: 432
Joined: 16 Mar 2015
Location: UK and France

Post 09 Feb 2021

esselfortium wrote:
09 Feb 2021
If you're in the market for orchestral libraries and you're on a budget, be sure to do a bit of searching around for previous sale prices. It's not unusual to see deep discounts on pricey libraries for summer sales, spring sales, Christmas sales, black friday sales, etc.

The most cost-effective option these days is probably the Core edition of Spitfire BBC Symphony Orchestra, which is normally $449 but goes to 40% off during their spring sale (around May I think?) and Christmas sale, and is discounted by an additional $50 if you've got BBC Discover (which you can get for free by filling out a survey), making the price around $220 if I've done my math correctly. That'll get you a complete orchestra recorded comprehensively in a great-sounding space.

If you just need some basic strings, brass, woodwinds, percussion, etc. groups and don't care about having separated instruments, their affordable Spitfire Originals series is also worth checking into.
budget is always in the mix, sadly
I mean, tube amps and OTT power conditioner are very high on the priority list
anyhow, that's a digression

highest priority for me right now is horns; r&b or jazzy rather than symphonic

then Latin Perc; loopmasters seems alright and hot costly

strings, I use more in my personal stuff and I'm looking for something really good

client films inevitably equal MOR POP or old school R&B/ Soul etc; which always need bass and horns

Thanks for your advice :-)

User avatar
syncanonymous
Posts: 432
Joined: 16 Mar 2015
Location: UK and France

Post 09 Feb 2021

@joeyluck
well, that's thrown out the context completely; which was not what I had in mind

now it just looks like I was the only person who bought Softphonics. By removing the thread from 2015, all the other members who were excited about Softphonics before me in a 7 page thread can no longer be back-tracked. At least post a link to the 2015 thread!

I do not want to be implicated as "the member who bought Softphonics". This thread deletion is was not well thought out. Are other members who bought Softphonics afraid to be outed? Many of the reasontalk members bought them. Please put it back the way it was!

User avatar
diminished
Posts: 1852
Joined: 15 Dec 2018

Post 09 Feb 2021

Free options for orchestral needs these days are:

Spitfire LABS (VST) https://labs.spitfireaudio.com/
Spitfire BBC Symphony Orchestra Discover (VST, you have to wait 2 weeks for a license) https://www.spitfireaudio.com/bbc-so-di ... ion/login/
Virtual Playing Orchestra (Sforzando) http://virtualplaying.com/virtual-playing-orchestra/
VSCO 2 (multiple formats, including VST and Sforzando) https://vis.versilstudios.com/vsco-comm ... l#versions
Orchestral Tools (SINE Player) Layers https://www.orchestraltools.com/store/collections/45
The Free Orchestra (for Kontakt Player, also free) https://projectsam.com/libraries/the-free-orchestra/
Vienna Symphonic Library Big Bang Orchesta Free https://www.vsl.co.at/en/BBO_Map/BBO (needs an eLicenser/ViennaKey, so probably only interesting for Cubase users)
:reason: Most recent track: resentment (synthwave) || Others: on my YouTube channel •ᴗ•

User avatar
joeyluck
Moderator
Posts: 8099
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

Post 09 Feb 2021

syncanonymous wrote:
09 Feb 2021
@joeyluck
well, that's thrown out the context completely; which was not what I had in mind

now it just looks like I was the only person who bought Softphonics. By removing the thread from 2015, all the other members who were excited about Softphonics before me in a 7 page thread can no longer be back-tracked. At least post a link to the 2015 thread!

I do not want to be implicated as "the member who bought Softphonics". This thread deletion is was not well thought out. Are other members who bought Softphonics afraid to be outed? Many of the reasontalk members bought them. Please put it back the way it was!
Sorry for any confusion. You are misunderstanding. First off, the thread was not deleted, I split the topic into a new one. What is completely out of context and confusing for users is when a thread is brought back from the dead, and spending time in the new posts, announcing a 'new string ReFill'...

In regards to Softphonics, you can read other threads about it here:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=7507209
viewtopic.php?t=7511272
viewtopic.php?t=7507158

Yes, it has been talked about a lot here. There is nothing wrong about talking about it if you want. There is nothing wrong with retitling your thread to something like, "Life after Softphonics: need new recommendations" or whatever you like. It is merely about an old thread and its existing title being confusing and the wrong context.

User avatar
syncanonymous
Posts: 432
Joined: 16 Mar 2015
Location: UK and France

Post 09 Feb 2021

joeyluck wrote:
09 Feb 2021
syncanonymous wrote:
09 Feb 2021
@joeyluck
well, that's thrown out the context completely; which was not what I had in mind

now it just looks like I was the only person who bought Softphonics. By removing the thread from 2015, all the other members who were excited about Softphonics before me in a 7 page thread can no longer be back-tracked. At least post a link to the 2015 thread!

I do not want to be implicated as "the member who bought Softphonics". This thread deletion is was not well thought out. Are other members who bought Softphonics afraid to be outed? Many of the reasontalk members bought them. Please put it back the way it was!
Sorry for any confusion. You are misunderstanding. First off, the thread was not deleted, I split the topic into a new one. What is completely out of context and confusing for users is when a thread is brought back from the dead, and spending time in the new posts, announcing a 'new string ReFill'...

In regards to Softphonics, you can read other threads about it here:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=7507209
viewtopic.php?t=7511272
viewtopic.php?t=7507158

Yes, it has been talked about a lot here. There is nothing wrong about talking about it if you want. There is nothing wrong with retitling your thread to something like, "Life after Softphonics: need new recommendations" or whatever you like. It is merely about an old thread and its existing title being confusing and the wrong context.
ok, thanks for the clarification. I wasn't going for clickbait; just context
without the the other 7 pages of users gushing over Softphonics from the old thread, context is lost

thread re-titled as my interest is not specifically "orchestral"...it's more related to the NI sounds
RSN 10.4d4_9878_RME UFX+_Intel Core i7-8700K 3.7 GHz__Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR4-3000
ASRock Fatal1ty Z370__Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti KalmX__Samsung 960 PRO/ M.2-2280 NVME SSD
:reason: :re: :recycle: :PUF_figure: :rebirth: :refill:

  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 1 guest