
I have yet to try this out, but I agree a bit of finesse on the GUI would go a long way. Anyway, congrats on the new release!
Thank you for reporting this and adding the source project. I will look into this asap.dusan.cani wrote: ↑14 Dec 2020Hi again,
I noticed some undesired behaviour with Macro controls. If I set macro for "a/d" parameter and I am controlling cutoff by this envelope, the random cuts in the sound appear while messing with macro:
- This is the proper clean sound of direct "a/d" automation.
tribute-attack.mp3
- This has the cuts when macro control is automated
tribute-attack-macro-cuts.mp3
Source project here: tribute-attack-macro.zip
I forgot to mention, the envelope on its own would be a damn fine utility device with gate/note in and maybe note/velocity sensitivity!Speo wrote: ↑14 Dec 2020Thanks for the reassurance that omitting an FX chain was the right call. Also great to hear that the envelopes are working for you! Point taken about the sustain. I do think it's a cool thing to be able to setup a loop shape that is sustained rather than only being able to sustain a constant value. But sustaining at a single point is not at all straight-forward right now, for sure.PinkSlime wrote: ↑14 Dec 2020I really like the new synth. Soundwise and workflow wise the envelopes are very handy. I can also work with the mod window, once I got the hang of it. The only point that was a very minor setback was the workaround in order to have sustain. I honestly think that an optional sustain point on the envelope would be faster, more handy and would not occupy two envelopes and one mod slot to implement.
Overall I am really happy to have bought the synth as I can get fast results with snappy envelopes for bass and pluck sounds. I am glad it is not burdened with an FX chain and that the workflow is focused on the oscillation and filtering. Congratulations once more for this release!
I always find it amazing how with every RE release there's always a huge discussion about the GUI and everybody thinks that their idea of what is practical/user friendly/aesthetically pleasing is obviously the only right one.
That is how discussions work most of the time. Everybody thinks, that his/her opinion is the only right one. Right?
Well, I'd make a distiction between discussions where there are actual facts and the question is more how to interpret them, and discussions like this one where what's being discussed is obviously down to subjective taste mostly. I find that with stuff like GUI's there's a lot of people that act like there is some objective standard that is being violated while I haven't really been able to discern one. Even with GUI's with a LONG development history like windows the tendency towards flat design seems more of a fashion/trend phenomenon, not some necessary improvement.
I thought "fashion" decisions are for ever...Auryn wrote: ↑14 Dec 2020Well, I'd make a distiction between discussions where there are actual facts and the question is more how to interpret them, and discussions like this one where what's being discussed is obviously down to subjective taste mostly. I find that with stuff like GUI's there's a lot of people that act like there is some objective standard that is being violated while I haven't really been able to discern one. Even with GUI's with a LONG development history like windows the tendency towards flat design seems more of a fashion/trend phenomenon, not some necessary improvement.
Hey I used to think brussel sprouts were gross until I learned to cook them properly
True. My GF watched me when i served it to her with a face between disgusting and a wish to kill me. Than she tried it and loved it and loved me more
An optional sustain on the envelopes (similar to Europa) will be part of the first big feature update. The filter arrows will arrive sooner! Really cool to hear you're getting mileage even out of the init table!zoidkirb wrote: ↑14 Dec 2020Great sounding synth, and IMO the GUI is very nice, and I like the context/nested menus. Also I've got no trouble discerning which filter or filter type I'm currently on. Arrows to select next/previous and filter type would be appreciated though.
On the one hand I like the speed and simplicity of the envelope system but seriously perhaps just a more traditional ADSR setup would be preferable. It too took me ages to convince the envelopes to do a simple ramp up into a long sustain.
Overall I appreciate the stripped back nature of this thing, and the power with those 4 wave shaping knobs. It's great how much you can get done even with a simple saw/sine, before you even get to using extra wave tables.
Hey thanks so much for the congrats and trying out the synth! The intro pricing lasts until 23 January so that anybody entering the contest is not at a disadvantage should they not walk away with a free license and still choose to purchase it after the contest is over.
Thank you! Can't wait to hear what you come up with!
Super happy to read this, it's exactly what I was going for!
Yes, the init wavetable crossfades between perfectly bandlimited saws of increasing bandwidth, so it's like stacking sines as in additive synthesis. It was not generated in Tribute, however there is a "Sine to Saw" table in the Basic wavetables in Tribute's resource folder that was. That one uses a LP96 upwards sweep to bring in the harmonics, so it's not perfect band limiting, but it's pretty close.Stygian Abyss wrote: ↑16 Dec 2020The sine to saw sweep basic wavetable shown in the video looks a little bit like it was created using additive synthesis. Is it the case ? Has it been generated using Tribute itself like the other wavetables ?
Would it be possible to add a mix knob to the unison section to alter the volume ratios between the center and additional oscillators ?
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot], ljekio and 1 guest