I aswell like the echo quite a lot, simple + on point.
MrFigg wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020https://www.reasonstudios.com/shop/rack ... ain-x8187/
Love the reverb on this one.![]()
MrFigg wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020https://www.reasonstudios.com/shop/rack ... ain-x8187/
Love the reverb on this one.![]()
chaosroyale wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020I'm another DIY modular maniac, but I think I can give you my point of view on why this looks like a good device.
It is not trying to be a swiss army knife or all-round multi FX. It is basically just a fancy filterered delay/verb, wrapped in one compact, easy to use GUI. (Depending on the particular sounds of the filters and the delay, it might also not be possible to make with native reason devices.. I'm still rather unconvinced by the Sweeper filters, they don't sound that great to me, especially the filter drive.)
Any device in any DAW is literally just a GUI between you and a way of doing sound work. Whatever GUI gives you the fastest way to get the results you want, is the right way.
For example, Reason you can only load and save complete combinators. But you might want to load your usual "filter and delay and overdrive" set-up into an existing combinator. Without a Super-Combinator 2 to make organizing and macro controlling easy, convenient units like this RE can be a time saver. 10 years ago I would have LOVED more devices like this, not to use all the time, but for when they are handy.
One could argue that the Pulverizer was exactly the same philosophy - 3 or 4 related fx together in a handy box.
EDIT: I take back my criticism of Pulverizer's GUI. I still love ya, Pulverizer, even though your distortion is weak sauce. GUI design in Reason devices really went downhill after that.
dvdrtldg wrote: ↑29 Sep 2020I don't really get the point of this sort of device in Reason, where you already have a modular setup in the rack (including patch saving/loading) that is more flexible and versatile than something like this could ever hope to be. I mean it looks cool and I'm sure it sounds great. It just seems a bit redundant. Maybe I'm missing something?
Agreed. I think all effects devices should have a master dry/wet control.
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot], Google [Bot] and 28 guests