danc wrote: ↑26 Jun 2020
NDKay wrote: ↑26 Jun 2020
Would we know of the Worst RE ?
Beeing "overprecisely" i think the worst RE would be one we never heard of, because it did not get released
and i think there are more than one of that kind.
Here are some simple instructions to determine the WORST RE, based on an open democratic vote of us Reason users...
1. Go to the Reason Studio shop.
2. Select Rack Extensions.
3. Filter the list by HIGHEST RATED.
4. Wait a few seconds for Reason Studios to do its stuff... now... there are currently 716 results.
5. Scroll down to the bottom of the list and keep going and keep going and keep going... at the very bottom is the WORST RE.
You can see the results here...
https://www.reasonstudios.com/shop/brow ... g&pagex=24
The WINNER is the SW4-C Multi-Switch Controller priced at £139.00 - receiving 2 out of 5 stars. Maybe it's the daft price... maybe it's just SH*T... you decide.
Go see for yourself...
https://www.reasonstudios.com/shop/rack ... ontroller/
Don't blame me... I just use simple logic to decide the worst. From where I am sat it looks amazing... as it uses the R.O.M.O.S concept aimed at producing random soundscapes on multi-speaker set-ups.
BTW - ReLabeler is 3rd from bottom. So no... it is NOT the worst.
Careful with such lists.
You've really not looked properly at the list, I can tell: the shop, being so fundamentally broken , that sorted list actually doesn't work. You have set it to sort by Highest Rated, yes, but please do note that the
result within each possible value range is displayed
alphabetically.
Look carefully, 4Dyne is first in the 4.5+ range because it starts with a numeral, then you got all the A's, the C's, the D's... and so on and soforth.
While it is possible SW4C is the lowest rated, it'd be purely coincidence, because it's also the last letter alphabetically within its possible 1.5 to 2.4 star range, so it's technically possible it might actually not be the lowest.
You'll also note from that and any other search page that Reason Studios really do not want potential users to know the actual rating, so they've now
removed them entirely from the product lists. You
have to click individual product pages to see the rating, but given there is no half-star averaging or, as there used to be, the actual numerical value, star ratings are largely meaningless now, as 3.5 products are effectively rated the same as 4.4. So pretty much everything is now just set to 4*, which may actively work to confuse users and hide worthwhile products from them by promoting products considered in fact by a reasonable majority of users as merely average, as suggesting they are well above average, while demoting some excellent products by not allowing them to be distinguished and lumped in with arguably inferior fare.