Compressors. How many do you really need?

This forum is for discussing Rack Extensions. Devs are all welcome to show off their goods.
User avatar
fullforce
Posts: 849
Joined: 18 Aug 2018

05 Oct 2018

I need... One MILLION compressors.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit.

User avatar
normen
Posts: 3431
Joined: 16 Jan 2015

05 Oct 2018

Data_Shrine wrote:
05 Oct 2018
There is something I don't get in compressor's marketing technique. They always say it's a super fast compressor yeee. But I tend not to use very fast attacks as much as possible. Am I nuts ? It just sounds better to me.
Back in the day it was actually technically hard to make a compressor fast. But now it's more like "this compressor still sounds good with fast attack, yeee". Most compressors get this "pushed back" or "small" sound when you use fast attack. Literally as if they were suppressing the sound - which effectively they do. Some compressors avoid that somehow though, be it by trading in for distortion or phase accuracy or simply timing and curve..

There isn't much data on it, I only saw one paper on this but I think it has a lot to do with how the protection system of our ears work. We have a built-in hardware compressor in our ears to protect us from loud sounds. And I think that has a lot to do with how compressors make something sound "big". Our brain might consider a compressed sound to be louder than it actually is because it "thinks" the ear had to compress it. Obviously these in-ear compressors most probably sound different from person to person (we will never know for sure ;)) so that might also be an explanation for people preferring different compression styles.

User avatar
Marco Raaphorst
Posts: 2504
Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Contact:

05 Oct 2018

selig wrote:
05 Oct 2018
Marco Raaphorst wrote:
04 Oct 2018
I am a big fan of RMS, variable-mu type compressors. Slow, like fader automation. Super smooth, almost unnoticeable. Often overlooked by many engineers imo.
I would say the LA-2a falls into the "super smooth, almost unnoticeable" camp, but is far from slow. Would you agree, or are you talking about vari-mu exclusively, and not opto types?
Yes LA-2A is great for quick but not pumping compression. And vari-mu is great for slow attack. I am using Klanghelm MJUC most of the time lately.

User avatar
NekujaK
Posts: 631
Joined: 09 Oct 2016
Location: USA

05 Oct 2018

Thank you for this thread, and thak you, Selig, for the detailed and helpful explanation.

I have a selection of go-to compressors I use for specific purposes, but I also get overwhelmed (and sometimes confused) when trying to tease apart the differences between multiple compressors, especially when evaluating a brand new compressor. I guess what throws me the most is when people rave about how awesomely great some new compressor is, and I just can't hear what's so special. Case in point is the Klanghelm MJUC, which is lauded by seemingly everyone, but to me, it doesn't sound particularly special. It's definitely a functional compressor, but is it any "better" than my other 25 compressors? I can't really say.

And I guess this is where I get tripped up. I understand how compressors work and what they do, but to say that one is objectively "better" than another doesn't make much sense to me. Maybe I'm crazy, but for me, a compressor is "good" or even "great" if it simply helps me achieve the sound I want, regardless of brand, price, or hype.
wreaking havoc with :reason: since 2.5
:arrow: https://soundcloud.com/nekujak-donnay/sets

User avatar
motuscott
Posts: 3445
Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Location: Contest Weiner

05 Oct 2018

I think these engineers with a butt load of compressors set and forget, that is to say they get a good setting and that's where they leave it. If it works, fine. If not, on to the next unit. At least this is what I've ascertained from reading interviews with Brauer, Blake et al. I will defer to any actual audio engineers here. I'm not an audio engineer but I play one in my living room
Who’s using the royal plural now baby? 🧂

User avatar
normen
Posts: 3431
Joined: 16 Jan 2015

05 Oct 2018

motuscott wrote:
05 Oct 2018
I think these engineers with a butt load of compressors set and forget, that is to say they get a good setting and that's where they leave it. If it works, fine. If not, on to the next unit. At least this is what I've ascertained from reading interviews with Brauer, Blake et al. I will defer to any actual audio engineers here. I'm not an audio engineer but I play one in my living room
I think it's true that certain compressors are known for certain combinations of settings that work well for certain things. Like the Dr.Pepper setting for the 1176 and such. That might be a reason for that. I mean nobody uses the limiter mode of the LA-2A so thats literally a one-trick pony. Blessed be the digital age :D

User avatar
Data_Shrine
Posts: 517
Joined: 23 Jan 2015

06 Oct 2018

normen wrote:
05 Oct 2018
Data_Shrine wrote:
05 Oct 2018
There is something I don't get in compressor's marketing technique. They always say it's a super fast compressor yeee. But I tend not to use very fast attacks as much as possible. Am I nuts ? It just sounds better to me.
Back in the day it was actually technically hard to make a compressor fast. But now it's more like "this compressor still sounds good with fast attack, yeee". Most compressors get this "pushed back" or "small" sound when you use fast attack. Literally as if they were suppressing the sound - which effectively they do. Some compressors avoid that somehow though, be it by trading in for distortion or phase accuracy or simply timing and curve..

There isn't much data on it, I only saw one paper on this but I think it has a lot to do with how the protection system of our ears work. We have a built-in hardware compressor in our ears to protect us from loud sounds. And I think that has a lot to do with how compressors make something sound "big". Our brain might consider a compressed sound to be louder than it actually is because it "thinks" the ear had to compress it. Obviously these in-ear compressors most probably sound different from person to person (we will never know for sure ;)) so that might also be an explanation for people preferring different compression styles.

Thank you that's very interesting. I thought that the "it's a fast compressor!" thing pretty much only related to the possible attack ms settings (I know that all compressors are not made equal, esp. hardware vs digital in ms terms). With a standard compressor I usually the knee to make it hit harder or not, rather than a very fast attack.

User avatar
kuhliloach
Posts: 881
Joined: 09 Dec 2015

06 Oct 2018

2

User avatar
BRIGGS
Posts: 2137
Joined: 25 Sep 2015
Location: the reason rack

09 Oct 2018

fullforce wrote:
05 Oct 2018
I need... One MILLION compressors.
Image
r11s


User avatar
Marco Raaphorst
Posts: 2504
Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Contact:

10 Oct 2018

I am also loving the compressors which are included in my favorite saturation device, the SDRR of Klanghelm: https://klanghelm.com/contents/products/SDRR/SDRR.php

User avatar
dvdrtldg
Posts: 2401
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

10 Oct 2018

Marco Raaphorst wrote:
10 Oct 2018
I am also loving the compressors which are included in my favorite saturation device, the SDRR of Klanghelm: https://klanghelm.com/contents/products/SDRR/SDRR.php
Such a great plugin, as is the MJUC

User avatar
C//AZM
Posts: 366
Joined: 20 Jan 2015

10 Oct 2018

normen wrote:
05 Oct 2018



Our brain might consider a compressed sound to be louder than it actually is because it "thinks" the ear had to compress it. Obviously these in-ear compressors most probably sound different from person to person (we will never know for sure ;)) so that might also be an explanation for people preferring different compression styles.
Well there's less dynamic range, and the quiet stuff is louder and closer to the volume of the louder stuff, so it's perceived as louder because there's more "stuff" that can be heard. Maybe that's the psychoacoustic part of it. ; If we can hear a singer breathing, then it must be very loud.

User avatar
Marco Raaphorst
Posts: 2504
Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Contact:

10 Oct 2018

dvdrtldg wrote:
10 Oct 2018
Marco Raaphorst wrote:
10 Oct 2018
I am also loving the compressors which are included in my favorite saturation device, the SDRR of Klanghelm: https://klanghelm.com/contents/products/SDRR/SDRR.php
Such a great plugin, as is the MJUC
Yes MJUC is my fav compressor !

User avatar
Marco Raaphorst
Posts: 2504
Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Contact:

10 Oct 2018

C//AZM wrote:
10 Oct 2018
normen wrote:
05 Oct 2018



Our brain might consider a compressed sound to be louder than it actually is because it "thinks" the ear had to compress it. Obviously these in-ear compressors most probably sound different from person to person (we will never know for sure ;)) so that might also be an explanation for people preferring different compression styles.
Well there's less dynamic range, and the quiet stuff is louder and closer to the volume of the louder stuff, so it's perceived as louder because there's more "stuff" that can be heard. Maybe that's the psychoacoustic part of it. ; If we can hear a singer breathing, then it must be very loud.
Yes RMS goes up. Less dynamic is often felt as louder.

User avatar
selig
RE Developer
Posts: 11739
Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Location: The NorthWoods, CT, USA

10 Oct 2018

C//AZM wrote:
normen wrote:
05 Oct 2018



Our brain might consider a compressed sound to be louder than it actually is because it "thinks" the ear had to compress it. Obviously these in-ear compressors most probably sound different from person to person (we will never know for sure ;)) so that might also be an explanation for people preferring different compression styles.
Well there's less dynamic range, and the quiet stuff is louder and closer to the volume of the louder stuff, so it's perceived as louder because there's more "stuff" that can be heard. Maybe that's the psychoacoustic part of it. ; If we can hear a singer breathing, then it must be very loud.
And to add to that, I’ve always assumed that if we can “hear” a sound compress, it must be REALLY loud because only loud sounds make our ears compress.

It’s the same effect as when something gets so bright on screen that it “whites out” (basically clips) like our eyes do, making us believe it’s brighter than it is (especially if it follows a mostly dark scene).

Speaking of film AND really loud sounds, ever notice the sound design after a big explosion when the perspective is first person POV? Everything gets muffled and there’s a high pitch ringing for a few seconds/minutes. If anyone’s ever experienced that, or anything close to it, you’ll recognize the effect immediately!


Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk
Selig Audio, LLC

User avatar
selig
RE Developer
Posts: 11739
Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Location: The NorthWoods, CT, USA

10 Oct 2018

Marco Raaphorst wrote:
C//AZM wrote:
10 Oct 2018
Well there's less dynamic range, and the quiet stuff is louder and closer to the volume of the louder stuff, so it's perceived as louder because there's more "stuff" that can be heard. Maybe that's the psychoacoustic part of it. ; If we can hear a singer breathing, then it must be very loud.
Yes RMS goes up. Less dynamic is often felt as louder.
Less dynamic, yes. But “compressed”, not always. With slow attack and fast release at a high ratio and low threshold, RMS often does not go up and may even go down with extreme settings.

BTW, you have me very interested in demoing the Klangheim plugins…


Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk
Selig Audio, LLC

User avatar
C//AZM
Posts: 366
Joined: 20 Jan 2015

10 Oct 2018

In answering the OP's question, I was gonna say all I need is a lot of 1176s, and LA2As and I'm good! But then the Distressor which is a gift to all mankind popped up in my mind . Then there's the Neve 33609 Stereo bus compressor which glues a mix together. Oh and the DBX 160 (the old one) which is so good on drums that I never got around to using it on anything else since it's already being used on kick and snare.


In Plug-in world; I follow my HW preferences because #crotchetyoldman... BUT I use the Waves Renaissance comp all the time, It's a lot like the Mclass comp in reason in that it's a no fuss comp without a lot of sonic signature....unlike the secret weapon "P".

If they made the Pulveriser into a HW unit, I would already own at least two of them. It's got so much WTF-ness that it's a golden weapon for us Reason heads!

Klangenhelm DC1A FREE is my favorite free plug and the MJUC is great with a good price

The FET has a sonic sig that I love and use a lot. The Slate plugins are fantastic and have a lot of character and get at the essence of the HW they're trying to emulate..not exact, but they seem to not worry about faithful emulations as much as capturing and accentuating the mojo that people love about that specific gear.

UAD Compressors are wonderful...except for the fact that we ain't never gonna use them in Reason other than via some convoluted patch sequence involving light pipe, crack pipe and a young priest and an old nun.

Selig Leveler on vocs. I've even imported into Reason, used leveler and exported back out. The only problem with the Levelor is that it's not an obvious device. Unlike other compressors, you don't crank it up and see the magic. It's a surgical device that you don't really notice till much later in the mixing process..."why does this vocal take clearer and more present than the aux take? oh right" It's like using bleach on white clothes and then seven months later comparing two white shirts.

The other comps which emulate HW are also useful but here. I'm mentioning the favs.

Oh and Mace.

User avatar
selig
RE Developer
Posts: 11739
Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Location: The NorthWoods, CT, USA

10 Oct 2018

C//AZM wrote:In answering the OP's question, I was gonna say all I need is a lot of 1176s, and LA2As and I'm good! But then the Distressor which is a gift to all mankind popped up in my mind . Then there's the Neve 33609 Stereo bus compressor which glues a mix together. Oh and the DBX 160 (the old one) which is so good on drums that I never got around to using it on anything else since it's already being used on kick and snare.…
+1 to everything you said.
Man, just gotta say we think a LOT alike. It’s a little scary…




Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk
Selig Audio, LLC

djadalaide
Posts: 234
Joined: 11 May 2018

10 Oct 2018

Its not the only thing i use to alter dynamics, i use preamps, tape sims, tubes, limiters and any kind of distortion.
A lot of these are like compression, not the same.. but have an effect on dynamics and/or coloration.

Hauser+Quaid
Posts: 147
Joined: 06 Jun 2017

10 Oct 2018

Need? One, maybe two.

Want? ALL OF THEM!!

User avatar
Kalm
Posts: 554
Joined: 03 Jun 2016
Location: Austin
Contact:

10 Oct 2018

Man if yo want to learn the compressors, take one compressor and attempt tweaking all your necessary instances with that one only. You'll soon learn the character and reason why compressors are different, including their recovery, response times, transient detection, distortion, curves, and anything else that's not based on a ratio, attack, and release. I only use three in Reason. McDsp Moo Tube (which people either underrate or can't use), Synapse 160 emulation, and the SSL Bus Comp. I have to check out the other models but i just haven't needed anymore.
Courtesy of The Brew | Watch My Tutorials | Mac Mini Intel i7 Quad-Core | 16 GB RAM | Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB | Reason 11 Suite | Studio One 5 Professional | Presonus Quantum | Komplete Kontrol 49 MK2 | Event Opals | Follow me on Instagram

User avatar
Zac
Posts: 1784
Joined: 19 May 2016
Contact:

10 Oct 2018

kuhliloach wrote:
06 Oct 2018
2
Prior to r6 this was true? From a choice of conp01 and mclass comp. Oh and Scream... actually does very nice compression.

User avatar
Loque
Moderator
Posts: 11187
Joined: 28 Dec 2015

10 Oct 2018

Zac wrote:
10 Oct 2018
kuhliloach wrote:
06 Oct 2018
2
Prior to r6 this was true? From a choice of conp01 and mclass comp. Oh and Scream... actually does very nice compression.
Yea, Scream4 is still very good. I like the RM, tape compression and lofi very much...
Reason12, Win10

User avatar
normen
Posts: 3431
Joined: 16 Jan 2015

10 Oct 2018

Kalm wrote:
10 Oct 2018
Man if yo want to learn the compressors, take one compressor and attempt tweaking all your necessary instances with that one only. You'll soon learn the character and reason why compressors are different, including their recovery, response times, transient detection, distortion, curves, and anything else that's not based on a ratio, attack, and release. I only use three in Reason. McDsp Moo Tube (which people either underrate or can't use), Synapse 160 emulation, and the SSL Bus Comp. I have to check out the other models but i just haven't needed anymore.
This is a great tip - for more than just compressors. You will only know WHY you might want a certain device when you experienced the limits of others.

Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests