Selig ColoringEQ In The Shop!

This forum is for discussing Rack Extensions. Devs are all welcome to show off their goods.

User avatar
aeox
Posts: 2192
Joined: 23 Feb 2017

Post 26 Jan 2018

Yesss
Random songs/ideas go here:

User avatar
Electric-Metal
Posts: 557
Joined: 10 Dec 2015
Location: Landstuhl, Germany

Post 26 Jan 2018

Hell yeah. Downloading
:?: The question is - Who cares :?:

User avatar
Gorgon
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Mar 2016

Post 26 Jan 2018

No introductory offer, $99? Wow. That's quite steep. I'm gonna pass for now.
"This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit."

User avatar
selig
Moderator
Posts: 7902
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

Post 26 Jan 2018

Gorgon wrote:No introductory offer, $99? Wow. That's quite steep. I'm gonna pass for now.
You’ll be back, as you cannot resist my witty banter for long! ;)

Oh, and BTW, there IS a 50% off sale the existing products for the entire month of Feb. to celebrate 5 years of being Selig Audio. Yay[emoji312]


Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk
Selig Audio, LLC

User avatar
Gorgon
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Mar 2016

Post 26 Jan 2018

selig wrote:
26 Jan 2018
Gorgon wrote:No introductory offer, $99? Wow. That's quite steep. I'm gonna pass for now.
You’ll be back, as you cannot resist my witty banter for long! ;)

Oh, and BTW, there IS a 50% off sale the existing products for the entire month of Feb. to celebrate 5 years of being Selig Audio. Yay[emoji312]

Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk
The sale doesn't include ColoringEQ then?

And I can read your banter just fine without any EQ! :P
"This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit."

User avatar
Wickline
Posts: 534
Joined: 03 Jan 2017
Location: Japan

Post 26 Jan 2018

I got to play with this during beta testing and it is hands down my favorite production tool. It sounds amazing on everything and being able to use frequency targeted saturation does wonders for making something stand out in a mix.

Great work Selig!!
:reason: :record: :refill: :re: :PUF_take: :rebirth: :PUF_figure:

[Signature size reduced by a moderator] :puf_bigsmile:

User avatar
selig
Moderator
Posts: 7902
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

Post 26 Jan 2018

Gorgon wrote:
26 Jan 2018
selig wrote:
26 Jan 2018


You’ll be back, as you cannot resist my witty banter for long! ;)

Oh, and BTW, there IS a 50% off sale the existing products for the entire month of Feb. to celebrate 5 years of being Selig Audio. Yay[emoji312]

Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk
The sale doesn't include ColoringEQ then?

And I can read your banter just fine without any EQ! :P
Come on, you KNOW my banter is better with EQ…in fact, it's better with just about anything added… ;)
Selig Audio, LLC

calebbrennan
Posts: 245
Joined: 16 Aug 2016

Post 27 Jan 2018

Selig Rocks

http://www.seligaudio.com/products/seli ... ing-eq.htm

by all appearances its another master work from the man

Have not tried it yet but I don't get people slagging him for being priced 99

my veiw he's offering unique ways to get the mixs pumped and exiting.

I have to adnit I'm bored with all the synth varitions of RE's

but Selig is offering keys to blast off your mix

that is my perspctive

to me the most exiting addition to R 10 is synchronous

and Selig's color Eq is analgous in design but applied to freqency and saturation

Keep on creating bro

User avatar
Marco Raaphorst
Posts: 2453
Joined: 22 Jan 2015

Post 27 Jan 2018

I am a huge saturation nerd. This is simply the most effective EQ and saturation unit ever!

Thanks Giles!!!

User avatar
Wickline
Posts: 534
Joined: 03 Jan 2017
Location: Japan

Post 27 Jan 2018

With what it does, and how effective it is, it’s definitely worth the price tag.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
:reason: :record: :refill: :re: :PUF_take: :rebirth: :PUF_figure:

[Signature size reduced by a moderator] :puf_bigsmile:

User avatar
motuscott
Posts: 1554
Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Location: the new york

Post 27 Jan 2018

All EQs are the same :puf_smile:

Stirring it up, y'all
Sometimes a cigar is just a synth that's on fire

User avatar
Wickline
Posts: 534
Joined: 03 Jan 2017
Location: Japan

Post 27 Jan 2018

motuscott wrote:All EQs are the same :puf_smile:

Stirring it up, y'all
Image



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
:reason: :record: :refill: :re: :PUF_take: :rebirth: :PUF_figure:

[Signature size reduced by a moderator] :puf_bigsmile:

User avatar
EnochLight
Posts: 5625
Joined: 17 Jan 2015
Location: your mom

Post 27 Jan 2018

Congrats on the release, Giles! Fantastic eq, and as usual - something unique for the Reason rack that's never been done before. Bravo!
Windows 10 | Reason 11 |  Studio One 4.5 | Intel i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | Mushkin Reactor 1TB SSD | RME Babyface Pro | Nektar Panorama P-4 | Akai MPC Live | Roland System 8 | Roland TR-8 with 7x7 Expansion | Roland TB-3 | Roland VT-4 | Roland MX-1

User avatar
Gorgon
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Mar 2016

Post 27 Jan 2018

calebbrennan wrote:
27 Jan 2018

Have not tried it yet but I don't get people slagging him for being priced 99
Nobody is "slagging" anyone.
"This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit."

User avatar
selig
Moderator
Posts: 7902
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

Post 27 Jan 2018

motuscott wrote:All EQs are the same :puf_smile:

Stirring it up, y'all
Right On! One of the “believers” speaks the truth!

I do like to say all EQs sound the same if you can match their curves (the tricky part). And I also typically like to add “unless there is saturation involved”.

But now I have to also add “and depending on HOW saturation is added”…
;)



Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk
Selig Audio, LLC

User avatar
selig
Moderator
Posts: 7902
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

Post 27 Jan 2018

Gorgon wrote:
calebbrennan wrote:
27 Jan 2018

Have not tried it yet but I don't get people slagging him for being priced 99
Nobody is "slagging" anyone.
Well, certainly not here in front of everyone. Oh wait, you mean “slagging”? No, none of that either…


Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk
Selig Audio, LLC

User avatar
Gorgon
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Mar 2016

Post 27 Jan 2018

selig wrote:
27 Jan 2018

Well, certainly not here in front of everyone. Oh wait, you mean “slagging”? No, none of that either…
Trialing it. Looks impressive. :) Bit slow on the visual feedback though.
"This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit."

User avatar
motuscott
Posts: 1554
Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Location: the new york

Post 27 Jan 2018

You will not subvert me by agreeing with me Selig you devil.
Sometimes a cigar is just a synth that's on fire

JdA57
Posts: 48
Joined: 20 Jul 2017

Post 27 Jan 2018

Hi Selig,

very good work (Y) (ok, not the design / colors, but this is'nt as so important :D )

But please

a) maybe, can you give us a 'Solo'-Mode per Band (not only for Sat like it is now) ?
b) And in my eyes it wil be better to see the 'hz' / kHz' data a little bit longer (or I can change, what I wanna to see: note or Hz) or maybe show only the kind of EQ if we change it withing the little icons.
c) why no popups for the kind of EQ
d) can you implement a 'auto'-output (limit) or / and that the output-level will be corrected between bypass and on-mode?

ok sorry because all this questions, but will be nice if you can hear what we saw while testing this.
sorry for this engl.

thanks

I like this RE very much (Y) And maybe if you can change it a little bit, I'll buy ;)
Last edited by JdA57 on 27 Jan 2018, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
selig
Moderator
Posts: 7902
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

Post 27 Jan 2018

motuscott wrote:You will not subvert me by agreeing with me Selig you devil.
Ha - I cannot disagree with such sound logic!


Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk
Selig Audio, LLC

User avatar
selig
Moderator
Posts: 7902
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

Post 27 Jan 2018

JdA57 wrote:Hi Selig,

very good work (Y) But please

a) maybe, can you give us a 'Solo'-Mode per Band (not only for Sat like it is now) ?
b) And in my eyes it wil be better to see the 'hz' / kHz' data a little bit longer (or I can change, what I wanna to see: note or Hz) or maybe show only the kind of EQ if we change it withing the little icons.
c) why no popups for the kind of EQ
d) can you implement a 'auto'-output (limit) or / and that the output-level will be corrected between bypass and on-mode?

ok sorry because all this questions, but will be nice if you can hear what we saw while testing this.
sorry for this engl.

thanks

I like this RE very much (Y) And maybe if you can change it a little bit, I'll buy ;)
A-Solo works on the EQ “per band” when saturation is off!
B-is coming with SDK 2.5 update.
C- is coming with SDK 2.5 update
D-Output correct is done with the output knob! Read my earlier comments on why this “Feature” cannot work well in every case, so is better to leave to the end user. All you need to do is set the output so the desired level is achieved according to the peak hold meter. This approach only takes a second, is FAR more accurate than any “auto” solution, and you need to be aware of levels anyway (it’s really simple to do with a peak hold meter).


Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk
Selig Audio, LLC

JdA57
Posts: 48
Joined: 20 Jul 2017

Post 27 Jan 2018

ok, thx.

And So I now knowing how solo is working. But

Solo: please can you check this. Maybe I'm stupid, but if I'm using only maybe EQ 1 and 4, and I'm Solo 4. What I've to hear? Audio before or the after EQ (of this EQ-part)?. I think the after EQ, but it seems, that I don't hear this while soloing.

I knowing you are the specialsist, so maybe I'm going wrong here, but ...

JdA57
Posts: 48
Joined: 20 Jul 2017

Post 27 Jan 2018

Sorry, but another more question:

It's funny: most EQ's (as example: Rob P. too) telling 440 Hz = A4 (example: USA 440 Hz = named A4 too / Germany A') but you ("COLORING EQ") showing 440Hz = A3?
Is there a reason why, or maybe will there be a parameter to change our own about this?

thx. reg.

User avatar
selig
Moderator
Posts: 7902
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

Post 27 Jan 2018

JdA57 wrote:ok, thx.

And So I now knowing how solo is working. But

Solo: please can you check this. Maybe I'm stupid, but if I'm using only maybe EQ 1 and 4, and I'm Solo 4. What I've to hear? Audio before or the after EQ (of this EQ-part)?. I think the after EQ, but it seems, that I don't hear this while soloing.

I knowing you are the specialsist, so maybe I'm going wrong here, but ...
When you solo an EQ band, you will only hear what the EQ is adding or taking away from the sound - that’s why if you solo a band that has no boost or cut, you will hear silence.

The benefit to this approach is you can cut an EQ band, then solo it and only hear what you will be that band will be cutting. Sweep the band to find the “muck” you want to cut out, then when you un-solo the band you will now be cutting what you were just listening to!


Sent from some crappy device using Tapatalk
Selig Audio, LLC

  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot], Yandex [Bot] and 0 guests