Mastering Example in Reason 8.3

This forum is for discussing Rack Extensions. Devs are all welcome to show off their goods.
User avatar
Libraquaricorn
Posts: 345
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

14 Dec 2015

When it comes to dynamic range on various albums I guess a lot of us will find this interesting:

http://dr.loudness-war.info/

User avatar
ambeant
Posts: 180
Joined: 16 Jan 2015

14 Dec 2015

SA Studio wrote:Hey all :)

Got a new video I made to show off one example-process of Mastering a song in Reason. Using a few key Rack Extensions, I show an example of Mastering a song and give some info about basic Loudness metering. Lemme know what you guys think :thumbs_up: :)



http://www.reasontalk.com/viewtopic.php ... 95#p235595

User avatar
wendylou
Posts: 467
Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Location: Area 51
Contact:

22 Dec 2015

decibel wrote:i think the whole mastering thing is part of the final frontier that reason needs to conquer , the app is great for so many things in so many ways but its obvious that when a lot of people reach a certain level of experience with reason they are often choosing to rewire into logic, cubase or whatever in order to do the final mastering on their tracks using third party tools.. it would be great to see them rope in some of the big name developers to create some channel strips for mastering in reason etc, their priority should always be keeping us locked into the reason environment yeah, maybe they could add this as a feature to include with R9 alongside with sample loading and all those other things people have been requesting for years now :)
I agree, Reason could use more mastering REs, as it's quite capable of doing final masters. Reason is quite capable of mastering and I always wanted to not have to rely on doing it standalone in iZotope's Ozone 6 or in Logic.
:puf_smile: http://www.galxygirl.com -- :reason: user since 2002

User avatar
Marco Raaphorst
Posts: 2504
Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Contact:

22 Dec 2015

Here's my view on it: "Why limit, compress and EQ the 2-track stereobus while you can fix the whole mix more precisely?"

See my blog http://melodiefabriek.com/blog/mixing-the-master/

User avatar
wendylou
Posts: 467
Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Location: Area 51
Contact:

22 Dec 2015

Marco Raaphorst wrote:Here's my view on it: "Why limit, compress and EQ the 2-track stereobus while you can fix the whole mix more precisely?"

See my blog http://melodiefabriek.com/blog/mixing-the-master/
Excellent point and spot on! You have so much precision and separate control over the sound while still in multitrack. That's the place to be to dial in the precise sound. :puf_smile:
:puf_smile: http://www.galxygirl.com -- :reason: user since 2002

User avatar
Marco Raaphorst
Posts: 2504
Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Contact:

22 Dec 2015

wendylou wrote:
Marco Raaphorst wrote:Here's my view on it: "Why limit, compress and EQ the 2-track stereobus while you can fix the whole mix more precisely?"

See my blog http://melodiefabriek.com/blog/mixing-the-master/
Excellent point and spot on! You have so much precision and separate control over the sound while still in multitrack. That's the place to be to dial in the precise sound. :puf_smile:
Thanks Wendy!

Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests