More info here.
It should hit the shop very soon.
So funny! I had forgotten that RB made Euclid as well...Faastwalker wrote: I've been beta testing this. It's a stroke of genius & as insanely fun as Euclid is. It's definitely one of those, 'I can't think why someone didn't think of this before', RE's. A great idea that like Euclid has been executed perfectly. Just look at that GUI. Robotic Bean certainly has a knack for making inspired RE's that seem to be just what the doctor ordered & are stacks of fun to use.
YO !!! This is Dope man Really cool..and very useful..... Getting ready to Kiss The Matrix GOODBYE :t2018:
LOL, that was exactly my first thought !Faastwalker wrote:It's definitely one of those, 'I can't think why someone didn't think of this before', RE's.
Just to clarify, everything except the Record button is Remotable, so you can do most of the programming from a (properly configured) hardware controller. We would have liked to support Remote control for the Record button as well, but it's currently not possible.submonsterz wrote:Everything except individual step properties and the Record button can be automated I would had thought this would be a pretty essential feature TO have for this type of device ...... ????
Actually you can apply ReGroove, although the process is a little involved... You have to set up an RPG-8 (or similar) as a MIDI-to-CV converter, and connect its Gate output to Step's Clock input. Then you can just record a part with straight notes on the RPG-8's track. So the rhythmical information will be taken from the sequencer part (which can be processed by ReGroove), and the tonal information comes from Step.Kategra wrote:How can you get it to groove with just shuffle? Most of these midi sequencers are useless to me without the ability to apply ReGrove to them.
No ReGrove, no Note To Track for RE's... Reason blows on this chapter.
submonsterz wrote:Everything except individual step properties and the Record button can be automated I would had thought this would be a pretty essential feature TO have for this type of device ...... ????
buddard wrote:
Just to clarify, everything except the Record button is Remotable, so you can do most of the programming from a (properly configured) hardware controller. We would have liked to support Remote control for the Record button as well, but it's currently not possible.
As for automation, it's hardly any secret that automation in Reason is tied to MIDI CC's, which are limited to 127 of which many are already reserved. Looking at
buddard wrote:just
Maybe ya not including what could be with limited ccs left to choose from best idea on release and get wider feedback from a much larger and wider selection of users than just beta testers not a bad idea . As you can get the feedback on what most find more needed or beneficial For thier use. The record feature sounds a bummer one to add to the lack of pattern to track features . But I'd all ready given up on the pattern to track function all ready I'm thinking props won't like the integration to the core code for it to happen. But can only hope. I find this more of an interesting and useful to me device in concept than euclid I have others ways of getting that as I said before on props old forums.buddard wrote: the individual step properties, there are four per step (pitch, velocity, rest, tie) times 32, so that's 128 just for those...
So I thought it would be better to leave this open for at least the first release, because once you use up a MIDI CC number you can't take it back (for backwards compatibility).
But I promise you that there are tons of cool stuff you can do with Step as it is now. The Mute input, just to choose one example, is really powerful since it lets other devices control the mutes via CV. (Euclid will be getting this in the next update as well.)
ACEsubmonsterz wrote:
But I promise you that there are tons of cool stuff you can do with Step as it is now. The Mute input, just to choose one example, is really powerful since it lets other devices control the mutes via CV. (Euclid will be getting this in the next update as well.)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests