dannyF wrote:
dvdrtldg wrote:Jesus christ dannyF, do you have any idea what a tool you're being
dannyF wrote:
dannyF wrote:Dont make the mistake of believing that I care what you think.
dannyF wrote:
As far as I am concerned, What I've been doing is calling people out on passive aggressive ( and now, agressive-aggressive ) behaviour. I don't care how you think you see this.... What would you like me to do ... respond to MY situation through the way YOU see it ( or want me to ) ? That's just not the way life works man.
I assume you don't understand this situation.... but I will restate this as some people aren't getting it : if I am "attacked" on subtle level or otherwise - I will defend myself.
dannyF wrote:As far as Selig and the moderation
dannyF wrote: - I do not have an opinion other than Selig has allowed me to have a voice in defending myself so for that he wins points with me, although at the same time there might be some truth to what Mr44Hz was on about ( ie allowing the subtle remarks against those who don't glorify every new RE ).
Now can we get back on topic, or does someone else feel the need to keep this going?
I would ask that everyone consider that "defending yourself" is NOT something ANYONE want's to come to a Reason Forum to read (and if you DO, you've come to the wrong place).
Bluntly: This is not the place for you guys to attack and defend your "personal" issues.
If you are NOT talking about the AD 480 (or similar) in this thread, and are instead talking about "who started it", or playing moderator and calling out others on their "passive aggressive" attitude (which is about as passive aggressive as it gets, BTW), you are quite simply off topic.
Do I REALLY have to keep coming back here and explaining the obvious to you fine folks, or can I trust you are mature enough to figure it out on your own?