![Image](https://shop.propellerheads.se/media/product/rae%3Aru.turn2on.Blackpole/pictures/p1a3tn49rb12sv1ht89o71pfftusf.jpg?1447429404042)
$19
https://shop.propellerheads.se/product/ ... nthesizer/
GUI looks great!
I don't like being critical of design because I know EXACTLY how difficult it is. But I am going to throw this out there as a general design comment for all developers. In this particular case, I think the design would have benefited from a larger panel.joeyluck wrote:... GUI looks great!
True. I could see it being a little bigger. But I do appreciate a device that doesn't take up too much screen real estate.jonheal wrote:I don't like being critical of design because I know EXACTLY how difficult it is. But I am going to throw this out there as a general design comment for all developers. In this particular case, I think the design would have benefited from a larger panel.joeyluck wrote:... GUI looks great!
Many RE developers try to cram far too many controls and labels into too little space.
They could take that approach, even just adding one more rack unit of space, which I agree would help it relax a bit (especially in the lower section) though as others have said it's not so bad (no one is trying to win design awards here, right?).jonheal wrote:I don't like being critical of design because I know EXACTLY how difficult it is. But I am going to throw this out there as a general design comment for all developers. In this particular case, I think the design would have benefited from a larger panel.joeyluck wrote:... GUI looks great!
Many RE developers try to cram far too many controls and labels into too little space.
IDT.dvdrtldg wrote:CV ins/outs would be nice
You can't use rechargeable batteries. You must by special batteries only compatible with this synth.Grumbleweed wrote:As Rack Extensions are not transferable and are registered to a specific user, isn't the Kensington Lock a little superfluous? If it was stolen it wouldn't work anyway.
Also, can you use rechargeable batteries? I know some manufacturers insist on standard ones. Will it lose its presets if the backup battery expires?
Grum.
I'm not sure it's safe to say pulse width modulation isn't possible with IDT - done as a wave table process it would be quite simple to pull off IMO. Osc Sync is also possible - can only say I've seen it addressed (not by me) but can't say more.AJ_3000 wrote:Worth demoing at this price.
The IDT format is presumably why no PWM is possible? Sorry if this is off topic, but may I ask are there any other features IDT makes difficult in general? I am thinking maybe osc sync is one? It doesn't seem reasonable to criticize a developer for inherent limitations in the format so I would like to understand the restrictions, to have realistic expectations when considering an IDT instrument. As there seem to be a few lower cost devices appearing are they less involved when it comes to development (i am not suggesting for a minute they are an easy option here!)?
Personally, I find some of the display difficult to read but with practice navigating any GUI becomes easy , so I would not be put off. I think I find light text /dark background tricky in any context. Probably my advanced years .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests