
https://ln5.sync.com/dl/4f0e57f60/9b7b8 ... 2-vstqkhfn
Yeah agree the SR-71 does rule!! Incredible feat of engineering!!wendylou wrote: ↑13 Oct 2021This is a non-functional concept combinator so use the Editor to customize to your needs. Zip includes the 6U combinator pictured, plus separate transparent PNG backdrop as well as the original photo JPG backdrop. SR-71 still rulez after all these decades! Go fast or go home![]()
https://ln5.sync.com/dl/4f0e57f60/9b7b8 ... 2-vstqkhfn
SR-71-snqpshot.jpg
Actually, that's a myth. From Wikipedia:
On a typical SR-71 mission, the airplane took off with only a partial fuel load to reduce stress on the brakes and tires during takeoff and also ensure it could successfully take off should one engine fail. As a result, the SR-71s were typically refueled immediately after takeoff. This has led to the misconception that the plane required immediate refueling after takeoff due to leaking fuel tanks. However, leaks were measured in drips per minute and were not significant compared to the overall capacity.
Interesting. So it turns out to be partially true. It does leak fuel, and it is because the panels are cold/not expanded together, but it isn't a lot of fuel loss or the reason for the need to refuel.Italophile wrote: ↑14 Oct 2021Actually, that's a myth. From Wikipedia:On a typical SR-71 mission, the airplane took off with only a partial fuel load to reduce stress on the brakes and tires during takeoff and also ensure it could successfully take off should one engine fail. As a result, the SR-71s were typically refueled immediately after takeoff. This has led to the misconception that the plane required immediate refueling after takeoff due to leaking fuel tanks. However, leaks were measured in drips per minute and were not significant compared to the overall capacity.
Users browsing this forum: Coctavepus and 1 guest