So you've gone from discussing that punch in is not needed to saying digital comping is an alternative to punch in (wich it isn't, as i stated before...)... You see what you're doing here? You're just argumenting the same in another way, over and over, so it's you creating this ciclic argument.crimsonwarlock wrote: ↑24 Feb 2023I already said I respect that some people want to work that way. I'm not arguing against (auto) punching, it is a working system in its own right. I'm arguing there are alternatives available in the absence of auto-punch.
But I'll leave it at that. This discussion has already started to run in circles.
We don't want comping out, or even take any other functionality from reason's sequencer. At most we want a new completentary functionality. I think its time for you to stop "arranging" new arguments because they simply don't make sense anymore.
If there's anything we agree on is that this discussion is circling and is getting senseless.
Anyway... If "alternatives" were enought in other iterations, we wouldn't have VST3, VST2, Rack Extensions, Midi Out, or even audio in reason because the mindset until reason 4 was that anything reason didn't do could be done with alternatives. Might aswell stick to using Cubase in the first place as an alternative method! I've been on that side before, but i always had the context that an alternative way was a temporary solution until something happens that allows me to work as i want.