I thought the use of the sweeper was fantastic
So you want to sidechain?
I only came across this video sometime ago.
I've used Sweeper as a ducker for a while, but I thought the use of putting it as a send, mixed with an inverted signal, was pure genius.
I've used Sweeper as a ducker for a while, but I thought the use of putting it as a send, mixed with an inverted signal, was pure genius.
Get more Combinators at the deeplink website
This is called Send Ducking, we’ve been doing it in Reason for many years now, and a great way (maybe the only way?) to duck multiple channels by various amounts.
Shout out to Sweeper as envelope follower/trigger, the best in Reason currently IMO.
Selig Audio, LLC
Good to know, thanks!
A bit off topic, but do you implement the use of mixing the inverted signal for any other Send purposes?
i.e creating an "insert" out of a Send.
I was trying to think of some, but I can only imagine using with distortion perhaps.
Also, am I correct in thinking this method is better following the export of the stems - as the mix engineer will always have a clean/non-sidechained version of the track?
Get more Combinators at the deeplink website
Sounds interesting, but I’m not following the insert out of a send example?deeplink wrote: ↑08 Mar 2023Good to know, thanks!
A bit off topic, but do you implement the use of mixing the inverted signal for any other Send purposes?
i.e creating an "insert" out of a Send.
I was trying to think of some, but I can only imagine using with distortion perhaps.
Also, am I correct in thinking this method is better following the export of the stems - as the mix engineer will always have a clean/non-sidechained version of the track?
Selig Audio, LLC
Sorry that was a bit out of no where, the thinking is/was;selig wrote: ↑08 Mar 2023Sounds interesting, but I’m not following the insert out of a send example?deeplink wrote: ↑08 Mar 2023
Good to know, thanks!
A bit off topic, but do you implement the use of mixing the inverted signal for any other Send purposes?
i.e creating an "insert" out of a Send.
I was trying to think of some, but I can only imagine using with distortion perhaps.
Also, am I correct in thinking this method is better following the export of the stems - as the mix engineer will always have a clean/non-sidechained version of the track?
So typically, you would place a pump/sidechain effect as an insert - you only hear the affected signal.
Of course with sends, the result is hearing a mix of the original signal (source) with the affected (return) signal.
In the Send Sidechain example - the additional inverted signal inside the Send effect cancels out the source signal.
Thus - in my mind - having a Send Effect behave in the same way as if it was an Insert.
I'm just wondering, beside Sidechaining, when else something like this may be useful.
Get more Combinators at the deeplink website
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests