Bad mix

Have an urge to learn, or a calling to teach? Want to share some useful Youtube videos? Do it here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Marco Raaphorst
Posts: 2504
Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Contact:

01 Feb 2018

Listening to this... Michael's voice is pushed so far back in the mix. Que!?


User avatar
aeox
Competition Winner
Posts: 3222
Joined: 23 Feb 2017
Location: Oregon

01 Feb 2018

What voice? All I heard is a instrumental :)

User avatar
TritoneAddiction
Competition Winner
Posts: 4219
Joined: 29 Aug 2015
Location: Sweden

01 Feb 2018

Maybe the mix choices was intended to fit the song title. :D

User avatar
Marco Raaphorst
Posts: 2504
Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Contact:

01 Feb 2018

On the whole album the backin' vocals are way louder than the main vox.

User avatar
normen
Posts: 3431
Joined: 16 Jan 2015

01 Feb 2018

Thats what happens if somebody tries to make a MJ song "even better" after the 10th master of a master. I guess he over-did it with dat M/S prozessink.

Then again a mix that doesn't have at least one element that disturbs you is a bad mix :)

User avatar
Marco Raaphorst
Posts: 2504
Joined: 22 Jan 2015
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Contact:

02 Feb 2018

normen wrote:
01 Feb 2018
Thats what happens if somebody tries to make a MJ song "even better" after the 10th master of a master. I guess he over-did it with dat M/S prozessink.

Then again a mix that doesn't have at least one element that disturbs you is a bad mix :)
Yes I think so too!

MID is pushed all the way back and SIDE is too loud. The whole 2012 remaster has this out of balance sound. You would expect Michael to be working with experts only... not the case :D

Here's the original. Vocals are great on this one.


Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests