CZ V vs Virtual CZ.

Discuss VST stuff here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Creativemind
Posts: 4876
Joined: 17 Jan 2015
Location: Stoke-On-Trent, England, UK

21 Jun 2019

Hi All!

Arturia CZ V vs Plug-in Boutique Virtual CZ.

Been looking all over You Tube for a comparison video of these 2 but no joy as yet.

Anyone have both and can tell me which they think is best or most authentic.

My gut (as I have trialled both but Virtual CZ was months ago & CZ V was a month ago so hard to say) says the Arturia one is probably the best.

Incidentally I did come across (on You Tube) a video by Benedict-Roff-Marsh (who comes on here sometimes) whilst searching who was comparing Arturia CZ V and Thor's Phase Modulation Oscillator (using the mod matrix too) which was interesting.

Thanks!
:reason:

Reason Studio's 11.3 / Cockos Reaper 6.82 / Cakewalk By Bandlab / Orion 8.6
http://soundcloud.com/creativemind75/iv ... soul-mix-3

User avatar
Micha1973
Posts: 468
Joined: 24 Mar 2017
Location: Germany
Contact:

21 Jun 2019

Both are Individual. CZ is a rompler but very good. Arturias is a thing u can make Sound from the ground up for you. Both are very good for 80s music like retrosynth or spacesynth.👍🎹
Music Is My Life
&
Reason 12 sounds better :essentials:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsW3Wr ... gA05XklBng

User avatar
raymondh
Posts: 1777
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

21 Jun 2019

Creativemind wrote:
21 Jun 2019
Incidentally I did come across (on You Tube) a video by Benedict-Roff-Marsh (who comes on here sometimes) whilst searching who was comparing Arturia CZ V and Thor's Phase Modulation Oscillator (using the mod matrix too) which was interesting.

Thanks!
Yes great video from Benedict, a very deep analysis of the product. It's very interesting to watch.

User avatar
Boombastix
Competition Winner
Posts: 1929
Joined: 18 May 2018
Location: Bay Area, CA

21 Jun 2019

Micha1973 wrote:
21 Jun 2019
Both are Individual. CZ is a rompler but very good. Arturias is a thing u can make Sound from the ground up for you. Both are very good for 80s music like retrosynth or spacesynth.👍🎹
Neither is a rompler. They both do PD synthesis.
VCZ has better patches, but no FX section.
Arturia has FX and a filter (nice filter), different envelopes - graphic drag - nice digital/linear envelops. Option to use a custom waveform "shaper" as . Unfortunately the patches are bit too many meh...washed in reverb.

VCZ has those lovely CZ old school sounds. But besides the MSEG and unison, Thor pretty much does the PD oscillators just fine (and you can mix in one more osc for custom sounds and simple filters). $99 for those VCZ presets, hmmm. I did not buy it.
Arturia is PITA to program, to dial in the filter, adjust the cutoff on the FX page, adjust the env mod intensity on the mod page, to adjust the envelop go to the frickin mod page... Aaarg. Presets are many but underwhelming and programming it makes you irritated. You have to jump through pages like you're driving and old Citroën ! There are interesting modulation features, FX sounds good, but the the mod combination is rarely used in the patches. Potential is there, sound is there, but no fun to work with, unfortunately. I wanted soooo much this to be the PD synth that just hit the home run... I have not bought it. Maybe in the future because PD is one of the best sounding synthesis methods in my opinion.
10% off at Waves with link: https://www.waves.com/r/6gh2b0
Disclaimer - I get 10% as well.

User avatar
pothole
Posts: 124
Joined: 17 Aug 2016
Location: Ireland

25 Jun 2019


User avatar
Boombastix
Competition Winner
Posts: 1929
Joined: 18 May 2018
Location: Bay Area, CA

30 Jun 2019

Guys! I spent some time comparing Thor CZ oscillators vs VirtualCZ and Arturia CZ V.
The winner: Virtual CZ.

* Thor can get some CZ sounds fairly well, but it all sounds a bit muffled and then you do not have the right envelopes. Also no way to buy patches, and the layout makes PD programming less than ideal. We have it for free, so nothing to complain about. It is Thor, not a CZ clone.
* CZ V - It is too clean and way too much high end, you need to use the filter (nice filter) to tame it, but then it doesn't sound like a CZ, more like some virtual analog. And like I said before, programming a filter with envelop and mod matrix is horrible, really bad implementation. I', sure you can dial in many nice sounds with the Arturia, but they will be more generic VA probably, using filters etc, and not THAT CZ sound. You need to overcome the issue of multi page jumping too. That was another no-no for me.
* Virtual CZ has a nice chorus and unison, but unfortunately no more FX. BUT, I gets the CZ sound right. Every parameter is on one page, so even if the MSEG are not the most intuitive, they are in front of you. I'll probably use it in a Combinator with a few optional FX that are fast and easy to turn on when needed.

Since they just have it on sale for another two days for $29, I was a no-brainer: :lol:
https://vstbuzz.com/deals/70-off-virtua ... -boutique/

Also, PB have several patch packs for around $8 (on sale) for more patches. Can be handy when you want to pickup a PB freebie plugin.
10% off at Waves with link: https://www.waves.com/r/6gh2b0
Disclaimer - I get 10% as well.

Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: dan_g and 17 guests