huggermugger wrote: ↑06 Jul 2022You should grab yourself a copy of Voltage Modular's Nucleus system. It's free, and it includes a S&H module. You can learn more about how to use S&H.
https://store.cherryaudio.com/bundles/v ... ar-nucleus
CV upscaler in reason stock?
Thank you, downloaded and installed. Checking it out eventually. Already got VCV rack and a hardware modular (I currently cannot use because of the living situation), so I at least got a little experience. Any advantages of Voltage Modular compared to VCV rack?
Ah yes, true that.
huggermugger wrote: ↑06 Jul 2022[...]
The S&H does have a Trigger input, like any S&H circuit. It's got Trigger, Samp (the signal to be sampled), and the Output. Here it is in action. I'm using LFO1 as the Trig and LFO2 as the sample source (i'm sampling a Triangle wave, so you get a nice pattern. S&H isn't just about random).
If the OP is asking for a Random LFO, there's a ton of them. Even Pulsar. But if the OP is asking for a S&H device (which I think they are), then none of the LFO's you've mentioned are the answer. An LFO or a noise source is not a S&H. A S&H is not the same as a random generator, although it can be used as one.
- huggermugger
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: 16 Jul 2021
I'm a longtime VCV Rack user too. At first, I found VM to be too basic, but the number of modules has quickly grown, over 1500 now. They cover a lot of ground, including some very eclectic, specialized functions.
I prefer the VM interface generally, easier to follow and manage. The Variations feature is excellent - you can store eight different presets in one saved patch. I prefer the browser in VM to the one in VCV. The Cabinets feature in VM is also really useful. VM works great as a VST in other DAWs, as well as being able to host VST2, VST3, and AU. And there's a VM module that I don't think exists in VCV, but I use it all the time, called Remote Control. Many modules have controls which have no CV input. Remote Control gives you CV access to those controls (and in fact to pretty well every parameter in a patch, including Performance and Global parameters). It's brilliant.
- Attachments
-
- Screen Shot 2022-07-06 at 10.29.15 AM.png (421.7 KiB) Viewed 2465 times
ok folks i got a lot of input - i'll go woth CV janitor for now and will demo the a-series another time. thanks.
Thank you very much for elaborating on a comparison. Haven´t done much yet with VCV rack, except for patching a patch once. Gonna check on VM. How do they compare soundwise?
huggermugger wrote: ↑06 Jul 2022I'm a longtime VCV Rack user too. At first, I found VM to be too basic, but the number of modules has quickly grown, over 1500 now. They cover a lot of ground, including some very eclectic, specialized functions.
I prefer the VM interface generally, easier to follow and manage. The Variations feature is excellent - you can store eight different presets in one saved patch. I prefer the browser in VM to the one in VCV. The Cabinets feature in VM is also really useful. VM works great as a VST in other DAWs, as well as being able to host VST2, VST3, and AU. And there's a VM module that I don't think exists in VCV, but I use it all the time, called Remote Control. Many modules have controls which have no CV input. Remote Control gives you CV access to those controls (and in fact to pretty well every parameter in a patch, including Performance and Global parameters). It's brilliant.
Oh yes, that´s a nice one. Just recently played around with it for the first time understandingly after having bought it when it was being released. The filter is neat aswell. In combination with Lectric Panda´s Scope afterwards it´s a pretty way sculpting CV and also learn the device.
rmtcvolte wrote: ↑06 Jul 2022Dont forget to demo this:
https://www.reasonstudios.com/shop/rack ... volt-sh-1/
Back in the days I used it to generate random notes in conjunction with gates generated by redrum. Visualisation of note values is perfect with pongasoft CVA-7.moofi wrote: ↑06 Jul 2022Oh yes, that´s a nice one. Just recently played around with it for the first time understandingly after having bought it when it was being released. The filter is neat aswell. In combination with Lectric Panda´s Scope afterwards it´s a pretty way sculpting CV and also learn the device.
Yes, CVA-7 is pleasant aswell. I especially like the possibility to move through the recorded part once you turned live view off. Can be modulated aswell.
rmtcvolte wrote: ↑07 Jul 2022Back in the days I used it to generate random notes in conjunction with gates generated by redrum. Visualisation of note values is perfect with pongasoft CVA-7.moofi wrote: ↑06 Jul 2022Oh yes, that´s a nice one. Just recently played around with it for the first time understandingly after having bought it when it was being released. The filter is neat aswell. In combination with Lectric Panda´s Scope afterwards it´s a pretty way sculpting CV and also learn the device.
This is an important distinction!huggermugger wrote: ↑06 Jul 2022The S&H does have a Trigger input, like any S&H circuit. It's got Trigger, Samp (the signal to be sampled), and the Output. Here it is in action. I'm using LFO1 as the Trig and LFO2 as the sample source (i'm sampling a Triangle wave, so you get a nice pattern. S&H isn't just about random).moofi wrote: ↑06 Jul 2022LIttle LFO contains a S&H waveform, aswell a smoothed one. And it´s also free.
https://reasonstudios.com/shop/rack-ext ... ittle-lfo/
EDIT: While I like Ochen´s A-series very much, the S&H needs a trigger to output.
If the OP is asking for a Random LFO, there's a ton of them. Even Pulsar. But if the OP is asking for a S&H device (which I think they are), then none of the LFO's you've mentioned are the answer. An LFO or a noise source is not a S&H. A S&H is not the same as a random generator, although it can be used as one.
FWIW I built a sample and hold combinator (using Thor IIRC) years ago just for proof of concept and because there was no other way to do this back in the old days…
Selig Audio, LLC
Yes, thoguht of it more like a random source when writing. Naturally the basic funcitonality is to sample a signal and hold it for a given time before sampling again. Noises work well being the source sampled from for random output.
selig wrote: ↑07 Jul 2022This is an important distinction!huggermugger wrote: ↑06 Jul 2022
The S&H does have a Trigger input, like any S&H circuit. It's got Trigger, Samp (the signal to be sampled), and the Output. Here it is in action. I'm using LFO1 as the Trig and LFO2 as the sample source (i'm sampling a Triangle wave, so you get a nice pattern. S&H isn't just about random).
If the OP is asking for a Random LFO, there's a ton of them. Even Pulsar. But if the OP is asking for a S&H device (which I think they are), then none of the LFO's you've mentioned are the answer. An LFO or a noise source is not a S&H. A S&H is not the same as a random generator, although it can be used as one.
FWIW I built a sample and hold combinator (using Thor IIRC) years ago just for proof of concept and because there was no other way to do this back in the old days…
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Yandex [Bot] and 26 guests