Correct
![Thumbs up :thumbs_up:](./images/smilies/Thumbs%20up.gif)
What's strange is that it had crossfades from the outset (but only via the multiple-clip arranger edit mode).
Yeah and the comp edit or whatever it's called is the dumbest thing. I love Reason but these little things have become bigger and more annoying as time has dragged on. Death by a thousand cuts. Anyway, no more ranting from me.avasopht wrote: ↑14 May 2022What's strange is that it had crossfades from the outset (but only via the multiple-clip arranger edit mode).
You could always access crossfades by merging audio tracks.
There are other features that are technically implemented and available in one mode, but not made available where IMO it would matter the most.
12 years?Stamatz wrote: ↑20 May 2022Are they ever going to fix the mislabeld port 2 labeled as port 3 on the back of the Dr. Octo Rex?
I know it's really a non issue but the release of R12 with all the graphic issues, you would think they woiuld at least take five minutes to fix that and get it out of the way.
I mean really, how long would it take for someone to change a digit on simple label?
Do you expect updates on v12 affecting v11?
Well I respectfully disagree.guitfnky wrote: ↑25 May 2022as someone who also works in the tech industry I don't feel bad for them at all. it's literally their job to deal with this stuff and if it's not up to par they should have to answer for that, just as anyone should if they're doing subpar work.
the Apple examples above are improvements...very small, but even a marginal improvement is an improvement. there are things in Reason that are objectively worse than they were in previous versions, so being critical is fair. newcomers should absolutely see that Reason 12 IS poor and buggy for a lot of users—certainly more so than in prior versions.
Again…do you have R12?Jac459 wrote: ↑26 May 2022Well I respectfully disagree.guitfnky wrote: ↑25 May 2022as someone who also works in the tech industry I don't feel bad for them at all. it's literally their job to deal with this stuff and if it's not up to par they should have to answer for that, just as anyone should if they're doing subpar work.
the Apple examples above are improvements...very small, but even a marginal improvement is an improvement. there are things in Reason that are objectively worse than they were in previous versions, so being critical is fair. newcomers should absolutely see that Reason 12 IS poor and buggy for a lot of users—certainly more so than in prior versions.
First, it is not because it is people's job that they don't deserve fair respect.
Second I am not saying we shouldn't give fair and constructive feedback.
But it has to be constructive. If it is to say full of bugs because you have one label not aligned I think it is just wasting the time of people.
Are you asking me? Yes I do have R12 and about 40 RE and I love this ecosystem (which is far from perfect).MrFigg wrote: ↑26 May 2022Again…do you have R12?Jac459 wrote: ↑26 May 2022
Well I respectfully disagree.
First, it is not because it is people's job that they don't deserve fair respect.
Second I am not saying we shouldn't give fair and constructive feedback.
But it has to be constructive. If it is to say full of bugs because you have one label not aligned I think it is just wasting the time of people.
Yes. I was asking you. Great that it's working for you. Problem is that it's not working for a lot of people and that's the reason people are complaining about it. By RS's own admission Reason 12 is far from perfect and they're working on it. We all love Reason, we're here on RT, but when a product is released and sold in an unfinished state then it isn't surprising that customers voice their indignation. I bought the upgrade to R12 the day it came out but due to continuous crashes, graphics issues and a plethora of other bugs I have been forced to revert to using R11. I know of many users who are in the same boat.
most of the criticism I’ve seen and given has been very respectful. you can call a piece of shit a piece of shit and you’re not disrespecting anyone because it’s an inanimate object.Jac459 wrote: ↑26 May 2022Well I respectfully disagree.guitfnky wrote: ↑25 May 2022as someone who also works in the tech industry I don't feel bad for them at all. it's literally their job to deal with this stuff and if it's not up to par they should have to answer for that, just as anyone should if they're doing subpar work.
the Apple examples above are improvements...very small, but even a marginal improvement is an improvement. there are things in Reason that are objectively worse than they were in previous versions, so being critical is fair. newcomers should absolutely see that Reason 12 IS poor and buggy for a lot of users—certainly more so than in prior versions.
First, it is not because it is people's job that they don't deserve fair respect.
Second I am not saying we shouldn't give fair and constructive feedback.
But it has to be constructive. If it is to say full of bugs because you have one label not aligned I think it is just wasting the time of people.
well-said. it’s great that some (many, even) aren’t having issues, but that doesn’t absolve RS of the fact that many of us ARE. I wish I hadn’t updated some of my critical projects to 12—I’d love to go back to 11 for those, but realized too late that I was having too many problems with 12. now it’s a slog to finish them.MrFigg wrote: ↑26 May 2022Yes. I was asking you. Great that it's working for you. Problem is that it's not working for a lot of people and that's the reason people are complaining about it. By RS's own admission Reason 12 is far from perfect and they're working on it. We all love Reason, we're here on RT, but when a product is released and sold in an unfinished state then it isn't surprising that customers voice their indignation. I bought the upgrade to R12 the day it came out but due to continuous crashes, graphics issues and a plethora of other bugs I have been forced to revert to using R11. I know of many users who are in the same boat.
I actually had a problem where I made changes to a project in R12 before realizing a few bugs. It was actually easy to go back to R11, though tedious as watching paint dry, I just built the same rack again in R11 and Copy/Paste for the next 85hrs between the sequencer, rack and the mixer settings.
While I totally agree with your sentiment, I have to wonder if this is the best example. A song is an emotional expression, and if someone doesn't 'get it' then it's difficult to say"therefore the song is bad".
totally agree. there are definitely better analogies out there to be made—just went with the one that popped into my head at the time.selig wrote: ↑26 May 2022While I totally agree with your sentiment, I have to wonder if this is the best example. A song is an emotional expression, and if someone doesn't 'get it' then it's difficult to say"therefore the song is bad".
Software OTOH, has a very specifically defined function (that's why there are user guides for software and not for songs!). If you say hitting command S will save the song, and it does not do so, it's a bug and it's easy to say that is "bad".
In other words, and just to clarify (agreeing with you)…
Criticizing a thing vs a person is indeed totally different, and why Reason Talk allows criticizing things but does not allow ad hominem attacks.
So while I can say "Reason sucks" (and hopefully provide specifics), I cannot say the same about a 'person' here.
That said, there are certainly "more helpful" vs "less helpful" ways to offer criticism, and the degree to which one tries to me more helpful things tend to be more pleasant all around IMO.
What if it’s a cake instead of a song? Not any fancy cake or anything, just a basic cake but it tastes like soap.guitfnky wrote: ↑26 May 2022totally agree. there are definitely better analogies out there to be made—just went with the one that popped into my head at the time.selig wrote: ↑26 May 2022
While I totally agree with your sentiment, I have to wonder if this is the best example. A song is an emotional expression, and if someone doesn't 'get it' then it's difficult to say"therefore the song is bad".
Software OTOH, has a very specifically defined function (that's why there are user guides for software and not for songs!). If you say hitting command S will save the song, and it does not do so, it's a bug and it's easy to say that is "bad".
In other words, and just to clarify (agreeing with you)…
Criticizing a thing vs a person is indeed totally different, and why Reason Talk allows criticizing things but does not allow ad hominem attacks.
So while I can say "Reason sucks" (and hopefully provide specifics), I cannot say the same about a 'person' here.
That said, there are certainly "more helpful" vs "less helpful" ways to offer criticism, and the degree to which one tries to me more helpful things tend to be more pleasant all around IMO.
The gaps are because the rack is wider to accommodate the wider audio/mix channels, which are now wider so that they can house Combinators.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], westcoastjoe and 5 guests