Processed pianos: bug in dynamics?
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: 27 Jun 2018
- Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Hi everyone,
since I got Reason 11 suite I switched from Radical Piano to Processed Pianos for practicing, I love the sound of the Grand D Cocktail preset, but I noticed that the dynamics are anything but smooth in Processed Pianos, whereas in Radical Piano the transition to other dynamic layers are seamless. In Processed Pianos you can clearly hear the transitions as I marked them, you can even see it in the bounced audio. The velocities are increasing linearly of course.
I do not know much about virtual pianos, but this is clearly a bug?
since I got Reason 11 suite I switched from Radical Piano to Processed Pianos for practicing, I love the sound of the Grand D Cocktail preset, but I noticed that the dynamics are anything but smooth in Processed Pianos, whereas in Radical Piano the transition to other dynamic layers are seamless. In Processed Pianos you can clearly hear the transitions as I marked them, you can even see it in the bounced audio. The velocities are increasing linearly of course.
I do not know much about virtual pianos, but this is clearly a bug?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 8634
- Joined: 28 Dec 2015
I tried to repeat the test you are doing and i clearly could here 3 layers of samples which does not sound "hypersampled" to me. The switching between the node velocities is not smooth, maybe there are not enough samples. Maybe not a bug,but "just" bad or not enough samples?
Make the sound dry, chose only 1 piano, and hear your test sound. You can hear 3 layers, nothing more.
Make the sound dry, chose only 1 piano, and hear your test sound. You can hear 3 layers, nothing more.

-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: 27 Jun 2018
- Location: Stuttgart, Germany
I see, I supposed there would be some care taken in the transitions. I do not think the samples are that bad, because I checked out the same model, Yamaha Grand D, inside Reason Pianos and it has 4 layers in NNXT, sounds smooth in the transitions. I strongly guess they used the same samples and packed them in another device. I tested all other pianos in Processed Pianos, same problem in the transitions.Loque wrote: ↑06 Dec 2020I tried to repeat the test you are doing and i clearly could here 3 layers of samples which does not sound "hypersampled" to me. The switching between the node velocities is not smooth, maybe there are not enough samples. Maybe not a bug,but "just" bad or not enough samples?
Make the sound dry, chose only 1 piano, and hear your test sound. You can hear 3 layers, nothing more.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 1398
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
For me the problem is not even the dynamics.
There's a bad bug with pedalling crossing too.
TBH, i still prefer to use the original refills. If you can grab it, it's a better option imho.
There's a bad bug with pedalling crossing too.
TBH, i still prefer to use the original refills. If you can grab it, it's a better option imho.
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 07 Oct 2020
This definitely looks like a bug. If I remember rightly the RDK RE is perfect for velocities vs the ReFill, so there should be no reason why the Piano RE would do this and, as mentioned, the old Reason Pianos ReFill works perfectly.moggadeet wrote: ↑06 Dec 2020Hi everyone,
since I got Reason 11 suite I switched from Radical Piano to Processed Pianos for practicing, I love the sound of the Grand D Cocktail preset, but I noticed that the dynamics are anything but smooth in Processed Pianos, whereas in Radical Piano the transition to other dynamic layers are seamless. In Processed Pianos you can clearly hear the transitions as I marked them, you can even see it in the bounced audio. The velocities are increasing linearly of course.
I do not know much about virtual pianos, but this is clearly a bug?
You should raise it with Reason Studios as a bug in the RE.
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: 27 Jun 2018
- Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Thanks for the opinions, I opened a ticket.DecafDreams wrote: ↑07 Dec 2020This definitely looks like a bug. If I remember rightly the RDK RE is perfect for velocities vs the ReFill, so there should be no reason why the Piano RE would do this and, as mentioned, the old Reason Pianos ReFill works perfectly.moggadeet wrote: ↑06 Dec 2020Hi everyone,
since I got Reason 11 suite I switched from Radical Piano to Processed Pianos for practicing, I love the sound of the Grand D Cocktail preset, but I noticed that the dynamics are anything but smooth in Processed Pianos, whereas in Radical Piano the transition to other dynamic layers are seamless. In Processed Pianos you can clearly hear the transitions as I marked them, you can even see it in the bounced audio. The velocities are increasing linearly of course.
I do not know much about virtual pianos, but this is clearly a bug?
You should raise it with Reason Studios as a bug in the RE.
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: 27 Jun 2018
- Location: Stuttgart, Germany
So I got the answer from Support:
So Processed Pianos are kind of a collection of piano sounds, but they are not intended to be played on their own ... go figure.It's true that the dynamics is not as great as in Radical Piano (or Reason Pianos).
The main purpose of processed Pianos was to have a great "pop piano" instrument, i.e. piano sounds that fitted in the mix, rather than be played on their own. So if you want superior dynamics, go for Radical Piano.
-
- Posts: 417
- Joined: 31 Aug 2015
- Location: Melbourne, AU
Interesting answer. I don't play piano enough to really have noticed this, but considering the source material, that's a bit disappointing honestly.
-
- Posts: 589
- Joined: 14 Jul 2016
Its great for ambient music i think . Freq shifter, chorus, comb filter and send those to the tap delay and reverb ..with the dry signal turned all he way down. I think it is possible to do and create similar effects with a chain of dedicated insert effects ...but its alot of work!
As a clean piano that plays clean piano'ry' sounds .. tis pretty hopeless imo.
As a clean piano that plays clean piano'ry' sounds .. tis pretty hopeless imo.
-
- Posts: 1930
- Joined: 18 May 2018
- Location: Bay Area, CA
Midi velocity = 127 rules !
Welcome to hyposampled pianos!
Reminds me about the old discussion about setting up that "RE with known buggs" (and errors) pinned thread...
(apologies if my sarcastic joke didn't roll off like water on a goose)
Welcome to hyposampled pianos!

Reminds me about the old discussion about setting up that "RE with known buggs" (and errors) pinned thread...
(apologies if my sarcastic joke didn't roll off like water on a goose)
10% off at Waves with link: https://www.waves.com/r/6gh2b0
Disclaimer - I get 10% as well.
Disclaimer - I get 10% as well.
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 07 Oct 2020
I guess either support just fobbed you off and they don't know for sure, or Processed Pianos is designed to be used at a fixed velocity then!
Perhaps Buddard at Robotic Bean can chip in as he often posts on these forums and from the back of the Processed Pianos RE it states it was a Robotic Beans job.
Buddard: Is the behaviour exhibited here to be expected or has something gone wrong somehow with the device and the samples aren't being crossfaded in terms of velocities properly?
Perhaps Buddard at Robotic Bean can chip in as he often posts on these forums and from the back of the Processed Pianos RE it states it was a Robotic Beans job.
Buddard: Is the behaviour exhibited here to be expected or has something gone wrong somehow with the device and the samples aren't being crossfaded in terms of velocities properly?
-
- RE Developer
- Posts: 936
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Stockholm
Sorry, hadn't seen this topic or your PM.DecafDreams wrote: ↑10 Dec 2020Buddard: Is the behaviour exhibited here to be expected or has something gone wrong somehow with the device and the samples aren't being crossfaded in terms of velocities properly?

Something might be off in the transitions, I'm not sure? It's been about 18 months since we worked on this one, but I believe we thought it sounded alright back then... But apparently not, I guess, haha.
There are 4 velocity layers for each piano just like on the NN-XT version, and each layer has its own volume and velocity sensitivity setting. I think those settings (along with the crossover velocities) also differ a bit between each piano.
Most settings were pulled directly from the original NN-XT patches, but I think there were some differences in the velocity response between NN-XT and Gorilla Engine that we had to adjust for. I don't remember it very clearly now, so I'd have to take a closer look at the sources to be sure!
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 07 Oct 2020
It's no worries, thanks for taking the time to reply!buddard wrote: ↑12 Dec 2020Sorry, hadn't seen this topic or your PM.DecafDreams wrote: ↑10 Dec 2020Buddard: Is the behaviour exhibited here to be expected or has something gone wrong somehow with the device and the samples aren't being crossfaded in terms of velocities properly?
Something might be off in the transitions, I'm not sure? It's been about 18 months since we worked on this one, but I believe we thought it sounded alright back then... But apparently not, I guess, haha.
There are 4 velocity layers for each piano just like on the NN-XT version, and each layer has its own volume and velocity sensitivity setting. I think those settings (along with the crossover velocities) also differ a bit between each piano.
Most settings were pulled directly from the original NN-XT patches, but I think there were some differences in the velocity response between NN-XT and Gorilla Engine that we had to adjust for. I don't remember it very clearly now, so I'd have to take a closer look at the sources to be sure!
Does the Gorilla Engine allow for as seamless a layer transition as NN-XT? On the screenshot of the waveform for Reason Pianos ReFill, posted by the op, it's actually impossible to see where one of the 4 layers ends and the next one begins.
Just wondering if the fact the layers show more obviously in the waveform on Processed Pianos, is because of something more inherent in the way the Gorilla Engine works when handling sample layers, rather than a programming problem in the patch?
Anything you can do to look into this and let us know if it's a limitation rather than a bug, would be much appreciated!
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: 27 Jun 2018
- Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Yes, it would be interesting to know how does the engine mix between the layers.DecafDreams wrote: ↑15 Dec 2020It's no worries, thanks for taking the time to reply!buddard wrote: ↑12 Dec 2020
Sorry, hadn't seen this topic or your PM.
Something might be off in the transitions, I'm not sure? It's been about 18 months since we worked on this one, but I believe we thought it sounded alright back then... But apparently not, I guess, haha.
There are 4 velocity layers for each piano just like on the NN-XT version, and each layer has its own volume and velocity sensitivity setting. I think those settings (along with the crossover velocities) also differ a bit between each piano.
Most settings were pulled directly from the original NN-XT patches, but I think there were some differences in the velocity response between NN-XT and Gorilla Engine that we had to adjust for. I don't remember it very clearly now, so I'd have to take a closer look at the sources to be sure!
Does the Gorilla Engine allow for as seamless a layer transition as NN-XT? On the screenshot of the waveform for Reason Pianos ReFill, posted by the op, it's actually impossible to see where one of the 4 layers ends and the next one begins.
Just wondering if the fact the layers show more obviously in the waveform on Processed Pianos, is because of something more inherent in the way the Gorilla Engine works when handling sample layers, rather than a programming problem in the patch?
Anything you can do to look into this and let us know if it's a limitation rather than a bug, would be much appreciated!
-
- RE Developer
- Posts: 936
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Stockholm
No, I haven’t had time to do that yet, I’ve been busy with other work.DecafDreams wrote: ↑21 Dec 2020Hey Buddard, did you get chance to look into this and if so is there anything to report?
Hopefully I’ll find some time during the holidays!
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 07 Oct 2020
Just noticed that Reason Pianos never did get pulled from the shop and is still available: https://www.reasonstudios.com/shop/prod ... on-pianos/
It seems to me like Processed Pianos isn't seen as a straight replacement like the Bass and Drums REs are for their ReFills counterparts...
It seems to me like Processed Pianos isn't seen as a straight replacement like the Bass and Drums REs are for their ReFills counterparts...
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 07 Oct 2020
Ah, it's gone now!DecafDreams wrote: ↑21 Jan 2021Just noticed that Reason Pianos never did get pulled from the shop and is still available: https://www.reasonstudios.com/shop/prod ... on-pianos/
It seems to me like Processed Pianos isn't seen as a straight replacement like the Bass and Drums REs are for their ReFills counterparts...
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot], Jabba Bakes, selig, Trendiction [Bot] and 5 guests