Don’t hit me, but i have to(!) output in 432 Hz... (please read)
Hello!
I don’t want to discuss the pros and cons about 432 Hz and also not about any conspiracys... It is a pure technical challange.
I have to edit spoken meditation tracks and compose some soundtrack for them. The customer is a friend of mine and he wants every track also in 432 Hz, because his customers are asking for this.
However, instead of converting a 440 Hz Wav, i would prefer to do this directly in Reason so that i do not have any loss in sound quality.
For the tracks i usually use one or two audiotracks for nature sounds and two or three synths or sampler instrumets.
Do you think the nature sounds have also to be tuned to the lower frequency? How would you do this? Bounce the tracks and then turn down the pitch -1,81%...?
Any help is appreciated!
I don’t want to discuss the pros and cons about 432 Hz and also not about any conspiracys... It is a pure technical challange.
I have to edit spoken meditation tracks and compose some soundtrack for them. The customer is a friend of mine and he wants every track also in 432 Hz, because his customers are asking for this.
However, instead of converting a 440 Hz Wav, i would prefer to do this directly in Reason so that i do not have any loss in sound quality.
For the tracks i usually use one or two audiotracks for nature sounds and two or three synths or sampler instrumets.
Do you think the nature sounds have also to be tuned to the lower frequency? How would you do this? Bounce the tracks and then turn down the pitch -1,81%...?
Any help is appreciated!
-
- Posts: 3732
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
I don't think you need to tune the nature sounds.
Use global tuning like Loque said. I don't remember if it does the current Hz when you tune it, and it is in cents, so using a spectrum analyser that displays Hz whilst playing a 440hz A and check the spectrum as you tune it down til it is the way you need it, should work. Melda has a free analyser that does the job in their free plugins bundle.
Use global tuning like Loque said. I don't remember if it does the current Hz when you tune it, and it is in cents, so using a spectrum analyser that displays Hz whilst playing a 440hz A and check the spectrum as you tune it down til it is the way you need it, should work. Melda has a free analyser that does the job in their free plugins bundle.
Dunno mate. What frequency is the nature originally tuned to? You can't make a decision until you know that. Find out.
- diminished
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 1880
- Joined: 15 Dec 2018
Change the global tuning.
To anybody else:
and the follow-up:
To anybody else:
and the follow-up:
Most recent track: resentment (synthwave) || Others: on my YouTube channel •ᴗ•
The nature sounds, I’m assuming, are nature sounds which have been recorded and so sound like they sound in nature. In that case you won’t get more natural than that. So no...don’t tune ‘em because then they won’t be at the natural frequency they’re supposed to be at.
🗲 2ॐ ᛉ
- kuhliloach
- Posts: 880
- Joined: 09 Dec 2015
-31 cents in the Master Tuning within Preferences is my estimate
- EnochLight
- Moderator
- Posts: 8405
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Imladris
Are nature sounds the same as pet sounds?
Win 10 | Ableton Live 11 Suite | Reason 12 | i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | RME Babyface Pro | Akai MPC Live 2 & Akai Force | Roland System 8, MX1, TB3 | Dreadbox Typhon | Korg Minilogue XD
... and if so do they make you Smile ?
This. Also they might get lower than you expect and end up unnatural. I wouldn't touch nature sounds tuning.
- EnochLight
- Moderator
- Posts: 8405
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Imladris
I actually learned about this for the first time in Tarantino’s “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”.
Win 10 | Ableton Live 11 Suite | Reason 12 | i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | RME Babyface Pro | Akai MPC Live 2 & Akai Force | Roland System 8, MX1, TB3 | Dreadbox Typhon | Korg Minilogue XD
I think I read about it first maybe 30 years ago in Ed Sanders (from The Fugs) book about The Family . Way I heard it from TG was that the song originally was called Cease to Exist but Brian Wilson changes the title to a less doomy Cease to Resist.EnochLight wrote: ↑06 Dec 2019I actually learned about this for the first time in Tarantino’s “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”.
You know Charles also auditioned to be in The Monkees?
🗲 2ॐ ᛉ
That's my estimate too.
- Carly(Poohbear)
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: 25 Jan 2015
- Location: UK
Just remember changing the master tuning does not effect VST's....
- EnochLight
- Moderator
- Posts: 8405
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Imladris
This, I did know. That guy certainly was a nut job.
I was just about to post this, but you beat me to it.Carly(Poohbear) wrote: ↑06 Dec 2019Just remember changing the master tuning does not effect VST's....
Win 10 | Ableton Live 11 Suite | Reason 12 | i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | RME Babyface Pro | Akai MPC Live 2 & Akai Force | Roland System 8, MX1, TB3 | Dreadbox Typhon | Korg Minilogue XD
That guy is full of himself.
Please stop trolling.
I can't imagine a barrage of complaint emails from clients saying "This isn't tuned to 432".
Reading up the history of pitch standardization is quite interesting though, since A440 is only relatively recent. Around the time of German composer Handel, it's been suggested that concert pitch was as low as 409, and the Baroque period was around 415.
Have you created any out of tunes lately?
Or
Have you created any autotunes lately?
Just pitching the concept
Or
Have you created any autotunes lately?
Just pitching the concept
Are you referring to me ?
Because as much as I am embarrassed to say this, but yes I have actually done some 432 stuff lately, as well as some 'binaural beats'. That's not to say I believe all the new-age bollocks around it, but the platform I'm contributing to does lend itself to such aural quackery
- Benedict
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 2747
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Gold Coast, Australia
- Contact:
I did a Binaural Beats track to see what would happen and to prove to people I can - why people think it is hard or even special I do not know.
While I really have little "faith" in the claims, it is interesting.
I have yet to do anything in 432Hz; no real opposition other than "common sense" but if it amuses people then why not - so long as they don't think I am endorsing their pseudo-science into fact (not that they need my help in that).
While I really have little "faith" in the claims, it is interesting.
I have yet to do anything in 432Hz; no real opposition other than "common sense" but if it amuses people then why not - so long as they don't think I am endorsing their pseudo-science into fact (not that they need my help in that).
Benedict Roff-Marsh
Completely burned and gone
Completely burned and gone
- Carly(Poohbear)
- Competition Winner
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: 25 Jan 2015
- Location: UK
432 hz .. .Proboscis wrote: ↑06 Dec 2019I can't imagine a barrage of complaint emails from clients saying "This isn't tuned to 432".
Reading up the history of pitch standardization is quite interesting though, since A440 is only relatively recent. Around the time of German composer Handel, it's been suggested that concert pitch was as low as 409, and the Baroque period was around 415.
: ) maybe for this kind of reasons ?
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests