reason 10 news?

[anilnc]

I think we will see another update to Reason 9 before 10 comes.

Yeah.. I guess a 9.5. But still would be a paid upgrade right?

[anilnc]

VST support. Most definitely happening this time.

Yes.. That'll make it top.

[anilnc]

I calculated the time between the release dates for the past 10 years of Reason releases.

Code: Select all

Version	  Date			  Days since previous version
Today		 4/19/2017		302d
9			  6/21/2016		630d
8			  9/30/2014		518d
7			  4/30/2013		578d
6			  9/30/2011		401d
5			  8/25/2010		1093d
4			  8/28/2007		901d
3			  3/10/2005	

The average time between major versions is 687 days.
The shortest time was between Reason 5 and Reason 6, which was 401 days.
The longest time was between Reason 4 and Reason 5, which was 1093 days.

If we consider only the three most recent versions (more likely to be representative), we get an average of 575 days.

We are, as of today, 302 days into Reason 9. If the current release pattern holds, we could then expect Reason 10 to be released 273 days from now which would mean Reason 10 would be released on January 17, 2018.

Man! You really got a lot of patience or top in maths, that you made a probability to guess next reason version.



But you missed 6.5 and 8.5 which I guess were not free upgrade. Correct me if I'm wrong.

[anilnc]

Oh well only 273 days to go

For the love of everything good please let there be video support.

Video support would be nice to.

YES... TRUE..

[ltbrunt00]

heck If reason had video support, I would have a extremely fun time scoring within reason.

[Oquasec]

Propellerhead should look at the studio one video to see what an update is

[RandomSkratch]

Please God, never let VST support happen in Reason.

That guy has the right idea. should stay theirrrr focus not a format that's already handled by other companies.

I can understand why some people would welcome this addition but fail to see why others are so against it.

[Oquasec]

There's already rewire and emi for that.
They can use other daws for vst support.

The point of reason was being the digital version of hardware devices and that's how it should stay imo :]

[RandomSkratch]

There's already rewire and emi for that.
They can use other daws for vst support.

The point of reason was being the digital version of hardware devices and that's how it should stay imo :]

So you think it would take away from it's original design? Interesting... I guess you see Reason as an instrument in itself and not a DAW then?

[Oquasec]

ALL DAWS ARE BOTH FFS

[fieldframe]

Ernst's Law: As the length of a thread about Reason approaches infinity, the probability of it becoming a debate about VST approaches 100%.

[RandomSkratch]

ALL DAWS ARE BOTH FFS

Let me ask you something. If tomorrow Ableton announced that Live would support Rack Extensions, how would you feel about that?

[Oquasec]

I'd blow up propellerhead headquarters for not giving that support to cubase or presonus.
Because I think that is a very stupid idea.

I use the daw I use because it follow similar control scheme to hardware devices AND IM NOT FOR THE NON CV.
Cockos, presonus & steinberg follow a similar design philosophy to propeller head products.

[RandomSkratch]

I'd blow up propellerhead headquarters for not giving that support to cubase or presonus.
Because I think that is a very stupid idea.

I use the daw I use because it follow similar control scheme to hardware devices AND IM NOT FOR THE NON CV.
Cockos, presonus & steinberg follow a similar design philosophy to propeller head products.

Now you really lost me... Ah well I tried to understand..

[Oquasec]

In english this means I don't use that other shit in my main productions, I've been on reason since 2012.
FLS from 2010 to 2014 [took reason out of it and slapped it in studio one for composing vsts]
with my foray into ableton/caustic and 5 other daws being 2016+

DOES THIS MAKE SENSE TO YOU NOW

[RandomSkratch]

In english this means I don't use that other shit in my main productions, I've been on reason since 2012.
FLS from 2010 to 2014 [took reason out of it and slapped it in studio one for composing vsts]
with my foray into ableton/caustic and 5 other daws being 2016+

DOES THIS MAKE SENSE TO YOU NOW

So you have no issues rewiring two DAWs together to get the best of both worlds but would not like it if you could accomplish your workflow in only 1 DAW? No that doesn't make sense to me, sorry I asked!

[Oquasec]

REASON CAN'T BE SHIPPED LIKE THAT BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT REWIRE DOES XD
THAT'S WHY IT DOESN'T SUPPORT VSTS NATIVELY, AND WHY YOU NEED TO DO REWIRE OR EMI/LOOPBACKING IT IS NOT PROGRAMMED LIKE A PLUGIN IT'S A SELF CONTAINED PRODUCTION SUITE THAT HAS MORE THAN ENOUGH TOOLS TO USE BECAUSE OF HOW IT'S DESIGNED.

[talex]

I'd really like to see a developer, maybe PROP's, create a free VST support RE that does absolutely nothing. It would be a
rack spacer that says in big bold letters, VST SUPPORT. When someone asks for VST support we can tell them to go
download the free VST support RE. It'll be sure to solve a lot of problems and confuse many. This would be a great
addition for R10.

[Oquasec]

THAT CAME OUT IN 7, ITS CALLED EMI

[RandomSkratch]

THAT CAME OUT IN 7, ITS CALLED EMI

I think your caps lock is stuck

[anilnc]

THAT CAME OUT IN 7, ITS CALLED EMI

I think your caps lock is stuck

[anilnc]

I agree what Oquasec says. Reason could keep developing and concentrating on it's own innovative racks than to bring VSTs. With Rewire we can connect reason with other daw and use vsts or videos like we do. That way, even reason won't get crashing issues due to some buggy vsts.

BUT.. Oquasec, you must understand that not all people can afford to buy another DAW, or waste money with limited version (LE) daws for less track counts etc. And also some who are more familiar with Reason for years cannot afford time for new DAW learning curve.

It's just a thought, an opinion, what people are expecting.

[Oquasec]

I'm not against vsts. I'm against them being a part of reason.
That's the purpose of that module that controls not only those, but anything midi related.
That's the purpose of using reason. Propellerhead could make their own dedicated loopback for vsts but hey.

[RandomSkratch]

I'm not against vsts. I'm against them being a part of reason.
That's the purpose of that module that controls not only those, but anything midi related.
That's the purpose of using reason. Propellerhead could make their own dedicated loopback for vsts but hey.

But you have no aversion to Rack Extensions?

[Oquasec]

RE/Vst/AU/RTAS/AAX are plugin formats.
Tailored for daws. The point of reason is modular.
They could waste their time adding another format via a complete rewritting of a daw or they could focus on the shit they are currently doing.

Asking for a feature that already has many existing methods is just not a good idea for a company who's goal was basically the same as protools.
Proprietary has priority. Instead of batch about the lack of stuff, how about instead you use what you got xD
You want vsts? I can sell ya a discounted studio one license.
Rack extensions are exactly what they are called. a library of digital rack devices that again, are acting as hardware.

But this is opinion. So instead of arguing with you over...seriously that? I'll just keep usin what props has to offer me plus synthedit, emi & loopback.