Exporting stems with no latency

This forum is for discussing Reason. Questions, answers, ideas, and opinions... all apply.
Post Reply
User avatar
Zac
Posts: 1784
Joined: 19 May 2016
Contact:

31 Jul 2021

I'm getting an Elektron Octatrack with the aim of doing some live sets. I have a large catalogue of Reason songs and I only use a small number of keys and tempos so I'd like to export my best stems from my old songs to help populate the OT.

I've been here a while and have a vague recollection that certain devices or techniques introduce a few ms silence on exporting files.

I'd like to avoid this and so I'm asking for the best method to export stems from Reason 11 and any devices or device chain positions to avoid. Thanks πŸ‘

User avatar
selig
RE Developer
Posts: 11818
Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Location: The NorthWoods, CT, USA

31 Jul 2021

If you end up using anything that adds latency, you can add one extra step to deal with it. Bounce the track back to Reason then edit it there as" audio only" (using no plugins at all, which won't add any latency). Then export tracks as before, knowing they will all line up perfectly.
Selig Audio, LLC

User avatar
Zac
Posts: 1784
Joined: 19 May 2016
Contact:

31 Jul 2021

selig wrote: ↑
31 Jul 2021
If you end up using anything that adds latency, you can add one extra step to deal with it. Bounce the track back to Reason then edit it there as" audio only" (using no plugins at all, which won't add any latency). Then export tracks as before, knowing they will all line up perfectly.
Thanks Selig. If that's the best methodology I'm guessing I could use any audio editor for the trimming of silence?

Is there an audio editor that can automatically trim any silence at the start of a sample? Anyone?

User avatar
selig
RE Developer
Posts: 11818
Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Location: The NorthWoods, CT, USA

31 Jul 2021

Zac wrote: ↑
31 Jul 2021
selig wrote: ↑
31 Jul 2021
If you end up using anything that adds latency, you can add one extra step to deal with it. Bounce the track back to Reason then edit it there as" audio only" (using no plugins at all, which won't add any latency). Then export tracks as before, knowing they will all line up perfectly.
Thanks Selig. If that's the best methodology I'm guessing I could use any audio editor for the trimming of silence?

Is there an audio editor that can automatically trim any silence at the start of a sample? Anyone?
Just use Reason. if you want to get all "science-y" about it, you could put a two pop ( 2 frames, 60 ms of a 1 kHz sine wave) at the top of every track, then bounce to audio internally. Then where necessary, line up the "pops" and then export. Make sense?

[oh yea, testing your process is easy by importing all your exported audio into a new song and see if it all lines up.]
Selig Audio, LLC

User avatar
Zac
Posts: 1784
Joined: 19 May 2016
Contact:

31 Jul 2021

selig wrote: ↑
31 Jul 2021
Zac wrote: ↑
31 Jul 2021


Thanks Selig. If that's the best methodology I'm guessing I could use any audio editor for the trimming of silence?

Is there an audio editor that can automatically trim any silence at the start of a sample? Anyone?
Just use Reason. if you want to get all "science-y" about it, you could put a two pop ( 2 frames, 60 ms of a 1 kHz sine wave) at the top of every track, then bounce to audio internally. Then where necessary, line up the "pops" and then export. Make sense?

[oh yea, testing your process is easy by importing all your exported audio into a new song and see if it all lines up.]
OK, I'll keep it simple. Thanks.

User avatar
fullforce
Posts: 849
Joined: 18 Aug 2018

01 Aug 2021

selig wrote: ↑
31 Jul 2021
if you want to get all "science-y" about it
Says the certified wizard.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit.

PhillipOrdonez
Posts: 3804
Joined: 20 Oct 2017
Location: Norway
Contact:

01 Aug 2021

Remember that in Reason trimming the silence is super easy thanks to the split at slices feature.

I did not know that bouncing tracks to audio had issues with latency in Reason 😱

PhillipOrdonez
Posts: 3804
Joined: 20 Oct 2017
Location: Norway
Contact:

01 Aug 2021

By the way, dude, the octatrack? You getting fancier and fancier with your gear πŸ˜‚

User avatar
Zac
Posts: 1784
Joined: 19 May 2016
Contact:

01 Aug 2021

PhillipOrdonez wrote: ↑
01 Aug 2021
By the way, dude, the octatrack? You getting fancier and fancier with your gear πŸ˜‚
I've had to sell a fair bit to afford the OT but it seems like learning it makes sense for getting use from my old material as well as new stuff. Hoping to get some nice happy accidents captured.

PhillipOrdonez
Posts: 3804
Joined: 20 Oct 2017
Location: Norway
Contact:

01 Aug 2021

Zac wrote: ↑
01 Aug 2021
PhillipOrdonez wrote: ↑
01 Aug 2021
By the way, dude, the octatrack? You getting fancier and fancier with your gear πŸ˜‚
I've had to sell a fair bit to afford the OT but it seems like learning it makes sense for getting use from my old material as well as new stuff. Hoping to get some nice happy accidents captured.
Wicked!

avasopht
Competition Winner
Posts: 3975
Joined: 16 Jan 2015

01 Aug 2021

You could try putting in false latency figures to trick delay compensation into cutting that amount from the beginning of the track.

User avatar
Zac
Posts: 1784
Joined: 19 May 2016
Contact:

02 Aug 2021

avasopht wrote: ↑
01 Aug 2021
You could try putting in false latency figures to trick delay compensation into cutting that amount from the beginning of the track.
Thanks, I'll try this if I find there's consistent delay.

Post Reply
  • Information