For iOS users, this is actually pretty bad ass:
http://9to5mac.com/2015/06/12/ios-9-aud ... sturments/
iOS 9 to fully support AU
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7823
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Useless Moderator
Win 10 | Ableton Live 11 Suite | Reason 12 | i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | RME Babyface Pro | Akai MPC Live 2 & Akai Force | Roland System 8, MX1, TB3 | Dreadbox Typhon | Korg Minilogue XD
-
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
This is pretty awesome though I was rather expecting Apple to do the opposite and only allow separate applications as "audio plugins" on OSX too, like it was/is on iOS. From a security standpoint thats the better solution because you don't have to execute arbitrary code (plugin) in the user and memory space of an application (host). I do think this is the better solution overall though.
-
- Posts: 998
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
- Location: Germany
If props would manage to RE in there...
Cheers!
Fredhoven
Fredhoven
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Yes it would be really nice if Re-s could work on iOS.Gaja wrote:If props would manage to RE in there...
Budapest, Hungary
Reason 11 Suite
Lenovo ThinkPad e520 Win10x64 8GB RAM Intel i5-2520M 2,5-3,2 GHz and AMD 6630M with 1GB of memory.








-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7823
- Joined: 17 Jan 2015
- Location: Useless Moderator
About RE's.. I have to imagine that their sandboxed nature and essentially being managed by Reason as a "virtual OS" would allow them to run on iOS as well as Android or any other platform - as soon as Reason can. That said, I have no idea actually.
Win 10 | Ableton Live 11 Suite | Reason 12 | i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | RME Babyface Pro | Akai MPC Live 2 & Akai Force | Roland System 8, MX1, TB3 | Dreadbox Typhon | Korg Minilogue XD
-
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Given what info about this is publicly available - yes, its definitely possible.EnochLight wrote:About RE's.. I have to imagine that their sandboxed nature and essentially being managed by Reason as a "virtual OS" would allow them to run on iOS as well as Android or any other platform - as soon as Reason can. That said, I have no idea actually.
-
- RE Developer
- Posts: 10229
- Joined: 15 Jan 2015
- Location: The NorthWoods, CT, USA
This is Doug Wyatt's project - you may remember him from Opcode creating OMS and with Apple creating OSX's Audio/MIDI system.
For those interested in hearing more, here's Doug's talk from two days ago at WWDC 2015:
https://developer.apple.com/videos/wwdc/2015/?id=508
And he's a very talented musician as well!
For those interested in hearing more, here's Doug's talk from two days ago at WWDC 2015:
https://developer.apple.com/videos/wwdc/2015/?id=508
And he's a very talented musician as well!

Selig Audio, LLC
-
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Honestly Audio Units were a wee bit over-designed, good call to make a simpler ObjC overlay for it.
-
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
normen wrote:This is pretty awesome though I was rather expecting Apple to do the opposite and only allow separate applications as "audio plugins" on OSX too, like it was/is on iOS. From a security standpoint thats the better solution because you don't have to execute arbitrary code (plugin) in the user and memory space of an application (host). I do think this is the better solution overall though.
i think there was such a big dev uproar about au sandboxing that it deterred them
-
- Posts: 3431
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Actually v3 AUs run in a separate process. And I didn't hear any "uproar", developers should easily see the advantages. This is something different than sandboxing anyway. Separate apps and separate users on an OS are not "sandboxing".Theo.M wrote:i think there was such a big dev uproar about au sandboxing that it deterred them
-
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Theo.M wrote:i think there was such a big dev uproar about au sandboxing that it deterred them
ok sorry i misunderstood but there was definitely an online forum uproar from quite a few major devs about logic and au becoming sandboxed.. so much that apple dropped it. Sorry I confused what you were saying with sandboxing.normen wrote: Actually v3 AUs run in a separate process. And I didn't hear any "uproar", developers should easily see the advantages. This is something different than sandboxing anyway. Separate apps and separate users on an OS are not "sandboxing".
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 0 guests