But it's got me wondering how much of our ideas of what other think is fabricated by these mass manipulations of our perceived status quo.
Think about it.
Think of all the people you know personally and how much the angry people in the comments section deviate from that?
I keep seeing the most ridiculous refutations of Neil DeGrasse Tyson that look like the works of a CPU starved GPT troll bot.
One attempted to refute his presentation on how to visualise what adding a dimension means and his explanation for why visualising 4 degrees and above is so mind bending and impossible for most to achieve, but they did so with a poorly formed formal description of dimensions that felt AI generated.
It's just not the sort of thing any competent mathematician who could make a proof would ever write.
When I speak to people in real life with opposing religious or political views, it's always easy to get along with them (and online too). But the anonymous strangers seem hell bent on disagreeing with everything.
What if we are the last bastion of human internet users?
Sidenote, check out neocities.