The UFO Thread

This forum is for anything not Reason related, if you just want to talk about other stuff. Please keep it friendly!
User avatar
jappe
Moderator
Posts: 2469
Joined: 19 Jan 2015

Post 26 Sep 2024

Then there's the Gatwick incident.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatwick_A ... e_incident

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... wick-drone

https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/12/1 ... -incident/
"The kind of manoeuvres the ‘drones’ were supposedly performing ought to have aroused at least some scepticism from officials. For instance, not even a military-grade drone could have stayed in the air for more than 24 hours, yet the Gatwick ‘drone’ somehow managed to wreak havoc for three days straight. Witnesses also described a drone weaving in between the airport’s buildings, performing complex movements that were not only technologically implausible, but would also have required intimate knowledge of the airport’s layout."
The British authorities still insist that Gatwick was subjected to a malicious, sophisticated drone incursion. Sussex Police say they received 170 reports of drone sightings during the three days when the airport was closed, 115 of which they deemed to be ‘credible’ – not least as many came from airport staff and police officers themselves.
Sounds familiar:
An investigation involving five English police forces was launched. But it had to be called off after 18 months, as it could find no video or photographic evidence to corroborate the drone sightings.
Also Yichang Sanxia International Airport supposedly cancelled flights due to drones Sep 24:

https://ground.news/article/a-suspected ... ted_e38f2f


User avatar
bxbrkrz
Posts: 3963
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

Post 26 Sep 2024

jappe wrote:
26 Sep 2024
Then there's the Gatwick incident.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatwick_A ... e_incident

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... wick-drone

https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/12/1 ... -incident/
"The kind of manoeuvres the ‘drones’ were supposedly performing ought to have aroused at least some scepticism from officials. For instance, not even a military-grade drone could have stayed in the air for more than 24 hours, yet the Gatwick ‘drone’ somehow managed to wreak havoc for three days straight. Witnesses also described a drone weaving in between the airport’s buildings, performing complex movements that were not only technologically implausible, but would also have required intimate knowledge of the airport’s layout."
The British authorities still insist that Gatwick was subjected to a malicious, sophisticated drone incursion. Sussex Police say they received 170 reports of drone sightings during the three days when the airport was closed, 115 of which they deemed to be ‘credible’ – not least as many came from airport staff and police officers themselves.
Sounds familiar:
An investigation involving five English police forces was launched. But it had to be called off after 18 months, as it could find no video or photographic evidence to corroborate the drone sightings.
Also Yichang Sanxia International Airport supposedly cancelled flights due to drones Sep 24:

https://ground.news/article/a-suspected ... ted_e38f2f

Sad.
757365206C6F67696320746F207365656B20616E73776572732075736520726561736F6E20746F2066696E6420776973646F6D20676574206F7574206F6620796F757220636F6D666F7274207A6F6E65206F7220796F757220696E737069726174696F6E2077696C6C206372797374616C6C697A6520666F7265766572

User avatar
bxbrkrz
Posts: 3963
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

Post 03 Oct 2024



"43 YEARS AGO!"
:D
757365206C6F67696320746F207365656B20616E73776572732075736520726561736F6E20746F2066696E6420776973646F6D20676574206F7574206F6620796F757220636F6D666F7274207A6F6E65206F7220796F757220696E737069726174696F6E2077696C6C206372797374616C6C697A6520666F7265766572

  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 0 guests