I think more simple.selig wrote: ↑25 Sep 2018OR, they will get simpler and simpler. Could go either way…Reasonable man wrote: ↑25 Sep 2018One thing for sure . They're gonna get more complicated and more complicated!
"Siri, I got this song in my head that..."Marco Raaphorst wrote: ↑26 Sep 2018"Siri, please record my friggin' guitar on the first track and gimme a crunchy sound!"
I think i need a new mobile phonenormen wrote: ↑26 Sep 2018"Siri, I got this song in my head that..."Marco Raaphorst wrote: ↑26 Sep 2018"Siri, please record my friggin' guitar on the first track and gimme a crunchy sound!"
"Alright, heres your master, shall I post it on the matrix?"
....
Haha! but what's hot and what's not is all subjective isn't it.jam-s wrote: ↑22 Sep 2018That's easy. Most folks wouldn't say 'no' to a "create a top1 banger right now!"-button.Creativemind wrote: ↑21 Sep 2018What's left?
I often think, what else can they add?
Will be interesting to see what people think the next big thing will be or any dream features people here would like in a daw that doesn't exist yet?
Dude, Apples "Music Memos" app kills me. You just record yourself playing guitar and singing via the iPhone mic and bam if you want it puts a fitting drum and bass (!) track right to the tune with one button - 90% of the time they were spot on for me.
There are countless other ways of composing, especially for people who like to sample their own works and mess around with glitch style effects that could be facilitated by the DAW.
I can somewhat understand the composite sample thing. Essentially what Studio One does for it's master file, you can tweak the mix and it also updates the master. I wouldn't trust my computer to make creative choices for me though. The rest pretty much goes back to convenience rather than innovation.avasopht wrote: ↑27 Sep 2018There are countless other ways of composing, especially for people who like to sample their own works and mess around with glitch style effects that could be facilitated by the DAW.
After composing I sometimes bounce everything down to audio and treat the recordings as samples to mess around with. A DAW could facilitate this by providing a "composite" sample that is treated as if it was just a sample, but after I'd finished with all my mangling, I could go back into my original project the recording was made from and adjust the mix, or even better, be given a channel strip to control static channel strip settings for the sample so that I would be able to modify EQ, effects, etc.
For articulations you could have some algorithmic articulation assistant for orchestral instruments that would take your patterns, play around with your instrument (sampling necessary articulations, or even articulations between a set of selected instruments) and then transform it into a more lifelike performance for that particular instrument. This could be accompanied by additional articulation controls to better instruct the algorithm. Alternatively, just some improved support for manual composition with articulations in mind.
A built in database of phrases from your projects based around a chord or chord sequence could be provided to help facilitate composers who tend to build lots of loops that could probably be exchanged between unfinished songs. This may even be a common need and could be facilitated by library "inspiration / progression" sequences that contain a simple piano or guitar backing to form the foundation (or chord format) for your sequences.
For browsing patches, a DAW like Reason could facilitate the exploration of one's sounds with suggestions of patches, folders or refills.
Some of these are all things you can sort of do yourself manually to a certain extent. If you had some developers working directly with forward thinking engineers and composers, by just building tools around their workflow and needs you could probably come up with a variety of different angles for a DAW.
yeah AI drummer and bass. and chord notation.
Definitely going to get back Studio One at some point. I really liked the workflow, I just wish there was tighter integration with Rewire so that I could record directly into either.QVprod wrote: ↑27 Sep 2018I can somewhat understand the composite sample thing. Essentially what Studio One does for it's master file, you can tweak the mix and it also updates the master. I wouldn't trust my computer to make creative choices for me though. The rest pretty much goes back to convenience rather than innovation.
Yeah Rewire can be a pain if you like to route individual outs. As a stereo mix I didn't mind it as much when I still used it. Fun fact though, the 'Transform to Audio' function works with Rewire the same way it does with VSTs.avasopht wrote: ↑01 Oct 2018Definitely going to get back Studio One at some point. I really liked the workflow, I just wish there was tighter integration with Rewire so that I could record directly into either.QVprod wrote: ↑27 Sep 2018I can somewhat understand the composite sample thing. Essentially what Studio One does for it's master file, you can tweak the mix and it also updates the master. I wouldn't trust my computer to make creative choices for me though. The rest pretty much goes back to convenience rather than innovation.