Hi all,
Hope it's ok to post this here. I'm looking for a recommendation.
I'll be honest, I'm a philistine when it comes to production. I'm a classically trained musician who loves synthesisers and orchestras, and am also a singer/songwriter. I understand some of the basic principles of production, but have neither the ear nor the instinct, let alone the patience, to really get the best out of my songs. So when I've finished writing and recording my album, I'm considering using a mixing/mastering service. I realise that production starts before you even start laying down a track, and I'm doing my best, but I don't have the ability to properly "produce" a track from the outset. So, I'm doing my best during the composition and recording stage, and need someone to polish it all up and get things as loud as possible.
So, does anyone know of a reputable service which could do this for me at a price that won't break the bank? I have found several services just by googling for mixing/mastering services, but to be honest all of their before/after samples sounded the same to me. And I don't want to pay money for someone just to put it through a multi-band compressor and normalise it...
Thanks in advance!
Mixing/mastering services
Not sure if you were cracking a joke but multiband compression should be more of a problem solver than standard practice and nobody should be normalizing in the final process. Mastering is about tonal balance with emphasis on EQ more than anything before compression, coloration, limiting, etc. But yeah the A/B shouldn't sound the same. Something you can do while you're searching for your engineer is to find some reference tracks that you more or less want to sound like as this will help both of you reach the final destination.
Thank you! I'll get in touch
Well, that was the point I was trying to make - I don't want to pay for a service which is ostensibly mastering, but just compress the hell out of it then normalise.
That's a great suggestion. I'm leaning towards a John Grant/Radiohead kind of sound at the moment, so picking out some tracks which have a similar feel and sound is a great starting point.
AI is a bit of a stretch but I'll give Landr credit for helping people who don't know anything about mastering.
If all it does, is ensuring ~ 1 dB headroom, filter the sound between 20-15000 Hz, centers frequencies below 80 Hz, then an automatic mastering tool may be harmless.
If by harmless you mean bland then sure. It looks like Cloudbounce gives the user more EQ Control but still bland.
I went down the Plugin Alliance rabbit hole this year and there's no turning back for me. Black Box HG-2 is on sale for the next nine hours. Great device.
I've never used their services, but I like the videos of Dr Mix on YouTube. There's also a guy on YouTube called Owen Palmer who seems to offer some services, although I am not sure how you would ask.
I feel like I'm in the same boat, as I know diddly about mixing/mastering. I'd love to hear your experiences with whatever service you choose, even if you just want to share anonymous feedback and not name the service.
Would the mixing/mastering people need to use Reason as well, or is there a common format that can be exported and worked on in other DAWs?
I feel like I'm in the same boat, as I know diddly about mixing/mastering. I'd love to hear your experiences with whatever service you choose, even if you just want to share anonymous feedback and not name the service.
Would the mixing/mastering people need to use Reason as well, or is there a common format that can be exported and worked on in other DAWs?
Reason 10 Lite | Surface Pro 3 i5 | Akai MPK Mini II | Yamaha Clavinova CVP5 | Fingers | Ears |
The common format is usually stereo/mono wav files (24 bit) for all individual stems (=mix channels) and separate FX stems.
Reason has a nice option to export those easily.
Reason has a nice option to export those easily.
I said: "If all it does, is ensuring ~ 1 dB headroom, filter the sound between 20-15000 Hz, centers frequencies below 80 Hz, then an automatic mastering tool may be harmless."
The things I said, avoid DA conversion clipping when it comes to inter-sample peaks, remove infra and ultra frequencies, and the differences between channels below the frequency range where the human hearing normally can't localize sound. That's about all, one can safely do automatically.
Thanks. I'm learning every day.
Reason 10 Lite | Surface Pro 3 i5 | Akai MPK Mini II | Yamaha Clavinova CVP5 | Fingers | Ears |
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: BRIGGS, challism, Electric-Metal, huggermugger, niclas and 13 guests