Man i totally missed this. I mix stuff for 20 years now, but i really like and always learn stuff by seeing others doing it, so I'm sure I'll check it out! I might do one of these myself one day, to show off my BCF2000x3 + BCR2000 modus operandi while mixing with reason! :) :thumbs_up: would watch ...

Was going to suggest PoohBears chart as well. I see two quick things to add/correct. One is the pre fader send which should be "post pan" as in Pooh's chart. Also note the Direct Outs (not in Pooh's chart) as switching jacks, which should mute the main path when connected. The rest looks right to me...

Just checked, and indeed OctaMed had MIDI support, but I don't know if that went any further than sequencing notes (I never had an Amiga). Around that time (I think) I was running Cubase on an Atari, which was much more capable than Octamed. Octamed was primarily a tracker, while Cubase was a full-...

As often as not, I don't want to boost the fundamental of the vocal, unless I'm going for an intimate, moody close-miked sound. Generally (though not always) the fundamental is the strongest harmonic in a timbre, and it doesn't need any help. I agree with vocals, am cutting lows more often than boo...

That depends on if you have a sequencer running for the track (hardware or software) and if the synthesizer in question can be controlled by that sequencer (with either MIDI or CV). Ahh good point. So say back in 1990, could the filter cut off be controlled in say Octamed on an Amiga computer? Sure...

I didn’t find that feature, but when I read stuff like this I think about all the amazing vocal mixes over the past 75+ years that never needed this feature. That said, I’ve explored stuff like this using pitch to MIDI and ColoringEQ to follow the pitch. It may be handy in some cases but seems almos...

jam-s wrote: ↑

24 Feb 2024

The best kind of noise removal is usually done via an offline process where the tool can analyse the whole file to generate a (dynamic) noise profile. This cannot be done just as good in a live process (like in an RE).

Came here to say the same, you can have it quick or high quality, pick one!

Waiting for the obligatory “this is an AI generated surprised youtube face” video. Will be as entertaining as the real thing, I’m sure…

As a songwriter you do this all the time, unless you’re a great singer yourself. I was in Nashville so we had many options, but now with the internet you have even more. There are things to look out for, to be sure, but it’s not much different from taking a chance on a new voice. And if you DO happe...

Yeah this is how I work. There is a bug though, if Reason isn't open and you select to open multiple audio files with Reason, it will duplicate the first audio file that many times. For example, if I select and open "file 1" through "file 4" Reason will open with four tracks of file 1. And this get...

Today I received an email containing a new version of a mix for me to reference in an on going project. I wanted to import the mix into the song file so I could quickly compare and see where I was "off". So in the email, I selected the mp3 and did a quick 'right click'. Up came an "open with" dialog...

Edit: Wow, this thing is like using a cruise ship to cross a tiny stream. It seems like way too much for the simple thing I'm trying to do. I'll keep playing with it, but I've got a feeling that I'll likely keep doing it the same tedious way I've been doing it. If you need something simpler, maybe ...

antic604 wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2024

Looks like I'm getting banned soon(ish), so thanks guys - it was fun while it lasted, appreciate all the help, chuckles & friendly banter

At your request, just to be clear…

BTW, wish those shortcuts were momentary, i.e. holding W would enable the pencil tool, but letting go off the key would go back to whatever was selected earlier - it's very handy in Bitwig. I know this isn’t exactly what you’re suggesting, but I find it quite useful. There IS a temporary tool switc...

when you name tracks in the mixer they should rename in the timeline too The “problem” with this suggestion is that there are no “tracks” in the mixer. There are “channels” in the mixer, which won’t show up in the sequencer unless you automate something on them, which then creates a track (for the ...

I always enjoy this guy's videos. I was aware of lots of synths back in the 70s (I was in high school), but never knew much about this one other than the name. I messed around with a borrowed PAIA in the late 1970s, which was a cheaper DIY synth from the same era as this one. They are often so quirk...

Over my many years I've explored odd time sigs lots of time. One of my first 'written' tunes was in 15/16 (7/8 + 4/4) and I'm always going back and revisiting these ideas. Here's a work in progress based on an Absynth patch which I felt had a bit of "swing" to it. So I approached the drums with a mo...

I used the term sum because there was some (mis)information on the internet which stated that playing an audio file rendered from the sum of all the tracks in a Reason project file (so the rendered master out/no effects) sounded different than playing separate bounced mix channel stems placed in an...

Manually as in soloing each track and rendering the master [track count] times? If that is the case I have a question. May be a noob question. If you render one track at a time like this and the master has absolutely no effects activated on it, then the whole process will be completely transparent/...

These threads can be annoying with butthurt fanboys cutting down other DAWs… Life tip (and forum tip) - if you get butthurt by a post, posting your annoyance won’t make your butt hurt less. No need to make personal attacks here, or to ascribe intentions on others - the rest of your post was awesome...

"Panel Sync": Not sure we're talking about the same thing, but I've wished for channel/track sync between Reason's three views since day one. Are we talking about different things? Running each panel (sequencer, mixer, rack) on a separate screen, hitting a track in the sequencer will bring the corr...

yea, this is nothing to do with Reason - This is totally sound card/OS world here. For example, if I don't have an interface connected, I don't have "loopback", at least on a Mac. With my Focusrite, it comes in on channels 5/6. But with the Apollos it is 37/38! I don't know if "aggregate devices" ar...

I only suggested there was more than the "one available" you mentioned. We seem to now be on the same page? Yeah, sure. The same way one could say Reason has polyphonic audio pitch editing, because you can duplicate the audio clip to 2+ additional tracks and edit them separately. Or that it has tra...

The breakout in The Echo is handy, but you can (and usually would) do the same thing with sends - although if you’re limited to 8 sends, as in Reason, maybe you can’t afford one for delay feedback. So in a way The Echo’s breakout exists to sidestep an arbitrary Reason limitation. How would you repl...

I get almost the same: the magazine, Reason.com, the dictionary definition, and Reason Studios.
And even before the name change, I'd be searching for Reason not Propellerhead. Which may be why they changed the name?